Connect with us

Accounting

Protect the CPA profession as traditional firms fade away

Published

on

We’re witnessing the evolution of the “new firm.” 

First, these aren’t audit firms. They are their own unique beast and don’t fit into this new firm model. They are firms:

  1. Where professional services and technology have merged together with a significant investment from venture capital or other outside capital. 
  1. That are merging up into a firm with private equity. They will eventually become public companies when PE won’t be able to get their money out, forcing an IPO. 

What do these new firms have in common? They focus on those services that don’t really need a CPA credential. Things like general accounting and tax, controller services, CAS, etc., can be done by anyone; a CPA is only needed to conduct a public company audit.  

Sound scary? Not really — if we as CPAs are willing to own that space in the marketplace. The CPA brand is significant and something worth having. But what happens when this influx of capital is commonplace and things change? How do we focus on protecting the profession and not the firm? This is key to our future!

The CPA in this evolving industry

Yep, I said it. Industry. Not profession. As certified professionals, CPAs work in a profession. But the new firm is focused on the industry where work is done by a broader group of people who work for a company and not a professionally licensed firm. 

I recently conducted a poll on LinkedIn where I asked if CPA firms will still exist in 2030. With 400 responses, 24% of respondents said they will not. So, if public accounting is evolving into a new business model, then how do we protect the profession within that business model? 

Today, just as the American Institute of CPAs advocates for the CPAs working in professional services firms, they also advocate for those CPAs in industry, working to protect the CPA brand for CFOs, controllers, etc. This could evolve into another group of CPAs. 

Let’s say someone works as a CPA for a technology company, selling services or professional services attached to that technology. They don’t report to the CFO or CEO, right? So, that’s not really an internal CPA. They are public-serving, but not part of a firm either. What do you call this group of CPAs? And how do you make sure the people in this role meet the rigorous standards of their credentials? 

These are the questions we need to be asking. We should be thinking about what that looks like in the future, too. The question then becomes what training or education is needed for these professionals, and what are the requirements that protect the CPA within this new industry. 

The real-time disruption

I’m dating myself here, but when I grew up in firms after graduating in the early 1990s, automation was just starting with computerized tax returns. It wasn’t that much later when I was starting my firm that QuickBooks came onto the scene. When you think about how work was done then compared to how work is done today, you see the real-time aspect the cloud has had on our work — disrupting the way we get things done. 

And that’s the biggest reason why firms haven’t changed. They don’t think about the real-time disruption of cloud accounting. The focus is too often on how a CPA is trained in a firm, where one person does the work and someone else reviews it. It’s all after the fact, right? 

Most firms still have a hard time with the idea of real-time, but if it’s truly a disruptor, then how do you quantify and qualify it? How do you educate around it? How do you maintain professional standards? That’s ultimately the problem to solve to protect the profession. 

Asking the right questions

This might not make a difference if you’re working in a firm or in a company that sells accounting and tax services, but as private equity came into the profession, so did a new firm model and structure. It’s here and we need to adapt.  

We’ve struggled with real-time for the past 20 years, but in today’s day and age, CPAs and accounting professionals are working on things as they happen. When you’re working in real-time, especially with technology and bots, you have to make sure that your output is at a certain standard. What that looks like is something we need to determine. The focus should be on the human element and serving customers, too, as bots can’t deliver either. 

I don’t have all the answers, and I never claim to, but we’re asking the wrong questions. We need to think about protecting the profession and not necessarily the firm. What questions should we be asking? 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending