Connect with us

Accounting

Synapse crisis aftermath shows ledgers are key

Published

on

Synapse, a banking-as-a-service (BaaS) company, filed for bankruptcy in April of this year after a year of financial and operational challenges, including disputes with its banking partners, two rounds of layoffs, and an incident where many Synapse customers were unable to access their accounts.

The Chapter 11 trustee appointed to oversee Synapse’s bankruptcy has struggled to reconcile all funds, with potential shortfalls between $65 million and $96 million. Partner banks have made progress in distributing funds, but significant discrepancies in Synapse’s records complicate full reconciliation efforts. According to a recent status report filed by the trustee, full reconciliation may be impossible.

This development has shed light on a troubling phenomenon: many cutting-edge fintech companies, which bring much-needed disruption to a sector that has stagnated for decades, still lack the essential infrastructure to effectively reconcile transactions, track funds, and maintain visibility into their ledgers.

Synapse’s crisis underscores this pervasive issue in fintech and highlights the urgent need for investment in technology and automated processes.

A Prevalent Problem

The Chapter 11 trustee has encountered significant challenges in reconciling funds and ensuring accurate distribution to customers. These efforts have been hampered by missing data and uncooperative former employees.

Despite making some progress in distributing funds from demand deposit accounts (DDAs), the trustee faces substantial hurdles in reconciling more complex “for benefit of” (FBO) accounts, where discrepancies in Synapse’s records have complicated efforts. Partner banks have identified numerous discrepancies in Synapse Brokerage’s program ledgers, further complicating the reconciliation process.

These challenges are not unique to Synapse and underscore a broader issue within the fintech industry: the struggle to maintain robust financial infrastructure capable of reconciling transactions and safeguarding customer funds. 

Despite their commitment to tech-driven efficiency, many large fintechs face significant challenges when it comes to managing key tasks such as reconciling payments and maintaining accurate ledgers. As these problems persist, they draw greater scrutiny from regulators, potential banking partners step back, investors raise more questions and most importantly, fintechs lose the most critical thing for every company that handles money – consumer trust.

Reconciliation and Ledgering Challenges

Why exactly are these seemingly standard financial processes so difficult?

First, fintech companies – and most businesses in general – lack the necessary technology to handle reconciliation at scale. While fintechs are known for digitizing and automating their own services and products, most of them tend to rely on antiquated manual systems to manage internal processes such as reconciliation, using Excel held together by a patchwork of macros and SQL scripts. Many companies delay addressing this issue until it becomes unmanageable.

Second, these fintechs handle extremely high volumes of transactions and complex flows of funds —e.g., pay-ins and pay-outs and a growing number of data sources connected to each flow of funds (banks, PSPs, ERPs, billing systems, internal databases etc.) – which further complicates ledger management. The risk of error increases exponentially, and when something goes wrong, simply tracking a single transaction and identifying the break in the chain can be a Herculean task.

And third, even if an individual company has a strong handle on its internal ledgering, there’s still the risk that its partners’ or customers’ bookkeeping standards may not meet the same level of rigor, potentially leading to inconsistencies when multiple companies collaborate.

The Stakes of Inaccurate Ledgering

In Synapse’s case, these challenges converged to deliver the final blow. The trustee’s inability to reconcile accounts exacerbated internal financial issues and disputes with key partners, exposing gaps that have strained Synapse’s relationships with customers, partners, investors, and more.  Due to the high stakes, accurate reconciliation is crucial for fintech companies. Losing track of customers’ money diminishes trust and business viability. Without the ability to track funds, protecting customers’ financial security becomes impossible.

With Synapse’s recent shortcomings bringing these issues under the spotlight, regulators are beginning to impose even stricter oversight over fintechs and their partner banks. Companies that fail to effectively manage their ledgering and reconciliation processes risk severe consequences, including financial losses, reputational damage and harming their relationships with partner banks.

The Solution: Technology and Automation

Though the finance operations sector has long been neglected, a new generation of tools is available to help fintech companies manage reconciliation and ledgering more effectively. These advanced technologies can handle high transaction volumes and complex fund flows, providing real-time visibility, a high level of accuracy, and operational efficiency.

To avoid the pitfalls experienced by Synapse, fintech companies should, first and foremost, prioritize minimizing or eliminating the risk of losing track of customers’ funds. This requires  investing in advanced technology that seamlessly integrates into their operations, automates critical processes, and streamlines operations prone to inconsistencies and discrepancies. 

Automated reconciliation systems offer several benefits, beginning with real-time accuracy. These systems ensure that transactions are accurately matched and discrepancies promptly identified, reducing the risk of errors. Automated reconciliation also streamlines financial processes, minimizing the manual workload. This not only frees up employees to focus on more pressing tasks but also enables more efficient scaling of operations, while reducing the number of human errors.

The ability to maintain accurate and transparent financial records in real time will bolster customer trust and loyalty and ensure compliance with financial regulations by providing accurate and timely financial data.

Another advantage is resilience and adaptability. Automated systems can quickly adapt to changing financial environments and regulatory requirements, providing a stable foundation for growth.

Learning from Past Mistakes

Though difficult for those involved, the Synapse crisis ultimately offers hopeful lessons for the fintech industry. Investing in technology and automation is crucial to prevent similar crises and secure long-term success. These investments are essential for maintaining accurate financial records, building customer trust, ensuring regulatory compliance, and achieving operational efficiency. By learning from Synapse’s challenges and embracing advanced technology to mitigate them, fintech companies can safeguard their operations and position themselves for future success in an industry where competition continues to be fierce.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending