Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Plenty scared now

Published

on

Loan wolf; collection plate; Tony who?; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

 Augusta, Georgia: Allen Brown, 41, operator of a ghost prep business has been sentenced to 46 months in prison after pleading guilty to wire fraud conspiracy.

In 2022 and 2023, Brown and several individuals operated a ghost prep business at three Augusta locations, including a church and Brown’s residence. Brown failed to identify himself as a paid preparer on the federal income tax returns that he prepared and filed for clients. 

He fabricated income to qualify his clients for tax credits, claimed fake deductions to inflate refunds and charged clients a fee based on a percentage of the refund. Brown did not provide his clients with a copy of the returns he prepared, nor did he review the returns with clients before e-filing them with the IRS. 

Brown and other ghost preparers who worked with him falsified 63 federal income tax returns for clients, causing the Treasury to issue $1,003,631 in false refunds. (Brown required his clients to pay him 10% of each refund obtained.) The scheme offered clients the “Standard” or the “I’m Not Scared” filing option, with the former generally resulting in a fraudulent refund of $2,000 to $9,000. The “I’m Not Scared” option resulted in a fraudulent tax refund of $14,000 to $30,000. 

For the latter, Brown instructed his ghost preparers to falsely claim Fuel Tax Credits and falsely report gross income and other expenses on Schedule C and medical and dental expenses on Schedule A. For the “Standard” option, Brown instructed preparers to falsely claim Sick and Family Leave Credits and other false items.  

Brown was also ordered to pay $1,003,631 in restitution and to serve three years of supervised release.

Gaithersburg Maryland: Accountant Harold Dotson, 54, has been sentenced to three years in federal prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, in connection with a conspiracy to commit wire fraud affecting financial institutions.

The fraud involved submitting more than $24 million in fraudulent CARES Act loan applications. Beginning in April 2020, and continuing through January 2022, Dotson engaged in multiple wire frauds involving submitting fraudulent loan applications for various COVID-19 relief benefits.

He was the owner and principal of H&M Tax Service, d.b.a. H&M Financial Group, a tax prep business, during the time of the conspiracies. He used his accountant expertise to assist with preparing numerous false and fraudulent Economic Injury Disaster Loans and Paycheck Protection Program applications for purported businesses that did not exist in any legitimate capacity. The fraudulent loan applications included false information about the phony businesses’ number of employees, monthly payroll and revenue.

Dotson also routinely created false IRS forms for co-conspirator Ahmed Sary, 47, of Brooklyn, Maryland, and other conspirators to submit with the false PPP applications. (Sary has been sentenced to seven years in prison in connection with the conspiracy.) In return, Dotson received a percentage of the fraudulent loan proceeds, ranging from 2% to 27%.

He received more than $828,498.95, primarily using the money to gamble at various casinos in Maryland and for a gambling trip to Las Vegas.

Dotson’s conspiracy with Sary resulted in the disbursement of $14,807,609.37 in fraudulently obtained PPP funds in connection with more than 85 fraudulent PPP loans. Dotson’s conspiracy with another co-conspirator resulted in the disbursement of at least 30 fraudulent PPP loans valued at least $6,499,823.12. More than $3.5 million was funded and disbursed in connection with Dotson’s submission of fraudulent EIDL applications.

Dotson was also ordered to pay $24,807,432 in restitution.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Scranton, Pennsylvania: Vincent Guntur of Dunmore, Pennsylvania, and Angelica Jones of Hauppauge, New York, have both pleaded guilty to one count of failure to remit employment taxes.

From around 2018 through the third quarter of 2024, Guntur and Jones owned and operated four companies in the business of temporary employee staffing. Guntur and Jones were responsible for collecting, accounting for and paying over federal employment taxes for their companies’ employees. Guntur and Jones willfully failed to collect, account for, and pay more than $1.3 million in employment taxes due and owing to the IRS during that time.

Both Guntur and Jones agreed to make full restitution of the employment taxes due and owing. They face a maximum of five years of imprisonment, a term of supervised release following imprisonment and a fine.

St. Augustine, Florida: Robert George Morgen Jr. has pleaded guilty to willfully making a false return.

According to court documents, in March 2019, Morgen submitted a false return for the 2017 tax year. Morgen knew that when he signed his return that his gross receipts and income were higher than reported. 

Due to multiple years of false reporting, Morgen owes the IRS $280,910 in back taxes.

Morgen faces up to three years in federal prison. He has also agreed to pay $280,910 in restitution to the IRS.

Mountain Top, Pennsylvania: Former tax collector Karen McGinnis has pleaded guilty to embezzling public funds.

From March 2023 to January 2025, McGinnis was the tax collector for a local township from which she embezzled more than $400,000 in property taxes.

McGinnis, who resigned as tax collector in March, has agreed not to seek public office for the longer of three years or any term of probation imposed, and she agreed to make full restitution of the money embezzled.

Farmington, Connecticut: Business owner Angelo Delmaro has pleaded guilty to tax evasion.

Since at least 2012, Delmaro has owned and operated commercial roofing businesses in Connecticut, initially doing business as Value Roofing, then Roofing Services of New England and most recently as Roofing Services. The businesses also provided paving services. None of Delmaro’s companies registered with the Connecticut Secretary of State or had a federal TIN.

From 2012 to 2022, Delmaro’s companies earned some $12.7 million in customer receipts, but Delmaro paid his workers in cash, never filed income or payroll tax returns for himself or the business and took several steps to conceal income and operating expenses from the IRS. Delmaro and others associated with his business cashed checks from customers at various check cashing businesses instead of depositing them into bank accounts; Delmaro provided the check cashers with addresses associated with UPS mailboxes rather than his home address so when the check cashers filed Currency Transaction Reports, the IRS only had a UPS mailbox location to try to identify source of income. He also had customers file false 1099s made out to a family member, rather than his business, or made out to Delmaro himself.

At times, when a customer requested that Delmaro provide a completed “Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification,” Form W-9, Delmaro worked with his father to prepare a false W-9 that included the name and Social Security number of his father and a UPS mailbox address. Delmaro sometimes provided customers with W-9 forms using false identities, such as “Harvey Rubino” or “Tony Stano,” which the customers used on the 1099. Delmaro’s father also used an alias, which differed from the name and information Delmaro provided to the customer.

Delmaro has agreed to pay restitution of $630,869 to the IRS. Sentencing is Jan. 21.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending