Connect with us

Accounting

DualEntry celebrates $90 million Series A for AI-native ERP

Published

on

ERP company DualEntry announced its exit from stealth with $90 million in Series A funding from Lightspeed, Khosla Ventures and GV (Google Ventures) in order to support its AI-native ERP system.

Co-founder Benedict Dohmen said that they developed their solution in response to the frustrations they experienced with legacy ERP systems. Dohman, alongside co-founder Santiago Nestares, had previously launched a company, Benitago, in college. The company grew fast, going from nothing to $25 million in annual revenue in five years to $100 million in annual revenue shortly after that. Like many such growing companies, they decided they needed a dedicated ERP system as they outgrew their small business-oriented solutions. They chose a popular ERP, but implementation soon turned into an arduous ordeal. 

“As a legacy ERP system, it was quite a catastrophe for us. It took us 18 months to go live. It cost us, I think, $150,000 or $200,000 in consultants. Meanwhile, the license still cost us $100,000 so we were paying for a blank screen the whole time. The first implementation failed. We had to switch implementation consultants. Then, even when we were live, it never really worked. We couldn’t handle the amount of transactions that we were processing. It didn’t have native integration, in this case, to Amazon and Walmart. And so it was very frustrating,” he said in an interview. 

DualEntry

He said he was shocked that, in this day and age, things were still this hard. He noticed that there were a lot of point solutions for HR and payroll and AP/AR that were much more modern and user-friendly versus those contained in legacy ERP systems, which he said “felt like you were stuck in the 1990s still, which is when these systems were born.”  This inspired them to develop DualEntry. 

While many systems have recently added AI features, Dohmen said that this is different from building AI directly into the software. A company might announce that they have a bill scan feature that lets people upload AP documents, which the system will use to populate a form, but he said this is more optical character recognition than AI. A true AI-native solution, according to Dohmen, goes beyond specific point solutions and into general workflow automation. 

“What it means to be AI-native is to have AI embedded in the architecture and infrastructure of the system such that you can go workflow by workflow. You can see where accountants spend most of their time, and then you can go workflow by workflow and help automate those with the use of AI. Rather than just something at the surface level, this is deeply embedded in the actual workflow, in the actual product,” he said. 

Asked to elaborate on the specifics, Dohmen said agents are woven throughout the system and are deeply involved in its functioning in, theoretically, unlimited amounts, saying “you could have a million agents, hypothetically, that run all in parallel and do work for you.” So, for example, in the case of a reconciliation, there could be an agent who looks at an individual statement line in a bank feed, another agent looking at just the amount, a third that examines past transactions to see if there’s any anomalies, another agent that collects all the information together “and says ‘ok, this is the output and this is the likely transaction in the accounting system that this bank statement line will match to, let me suggest that to the user,” while another agent offers a confidence score on the other agents’ accuracy. 

“So think of them as different workers. And then the ultimate output for the user is you have a bank statement line, and on the accounting side, you have a record that the AI suggests for you to create. And then you can hit create,” he said, adding that the AI will never post a transaction to their GL, it will only suggest the creation, “and that way, the controller and the finance team is in full control over what gets posted.”

The system supports over 13,000 native integrations. Unlike in other cases where companies meticulously build specific integrations one by one, DualEntry’s integrations rely on a powerful migration engine that can plug into almost any other API and feed that data into DualEntry’s structure. This allows users to build their own integrations for free, as the functionality is built directly into the program itself. 

“Traditionally, you’d have to map everything … With this unified API, unified ingestion engine, we’re able to plug into all types of variables and stream that data. And so that cuts our integration development time from a traditional down to the dual entry approach by 95%,” he said. 

Including this engine was not only a technical decision but a business one as well. In one of the company’s YouTube videos, Nestares said certain legacy systems purposefully don’t integrate with certain software so that they can then refer the customer to a separate company who acts as integration partner who paid for the referral; similarly, when a customer wants to change some part of the system, or wants something that referred to as out of scope, they’re referred to another company who serves as implementation partner who paid for the referral. He said this structure acts as a disincentive to ease implementation and integration. 

“At dual entry, we felt that pain firsthand to depend on outside consultants for every little change. Say we had a new M&A transaction, we’d have to involve consultants to add that new entity, it would charge another 5 to 15k just for a new company, it would take another two to three weeks or oftentimes more just to add it. Any slight workflow change would have to always depend on those outside consultants,” said Dohmen. 

DualEntry’s goal, according to him, is not to build a network of specialized service providers that provide ongoing revenue since they do not think of themselves as a services company but a software company.  

“Our goal and our core competency is to build the best possible and the best on the market, best in the world, accounting software, ERP software in the world,” he said.

The kinds of service agreements he talked about are usually a key scaling method for other companies, but Dohmen said that because their migration engine can build integrations without them, there’s less need to do so, which then allows them to pass the savings onto the customer. While they do maintain accountants to verify successful migration, because 99% of the work is done through the system itself, it’s still a much lower cost. 

“We can pass those savings in terms of headcount costs, in terms of time, we can pass those on to the customers. So what … other legacy ERP customers are experiencing today in terms of the different fees, the consultants, the different modules, all of that we can eliminate almost down to almost down to zero,” he said. 

DualEntry’s complete ERP accounting suite covers the full general ledger along with accounts receivable, accounts payable, live bank connections, audit controls, FP&A, and more. DualEntry is built for multi-entity, multi-book, multi-currency accounting, and is designed to scale with businesses from mid-market to IPO without needing add-ons or external IT support calls.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending