Inflation in the U.K. eased to 3.2% in March, the Office for National Statistics said on Wednesday.
That was slightly higher than the forecast from economists polled by Reuters of 3.1%, but was down from 3.4% in February.
Food prices provided the biggest downward drag on the headline rate, the ONS said, while motor fuels pushed it higher.
The core figure, excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco, came in at 4.2%, compared with a projection of 4.1%. Services inflation, a key watcher for U.K. monetary policymakers, declined from 6.1% to 6%.
This week, investors have been monitoring signs of a cooling U.K. labor market, with unemployment unexpectedly rising to 4.2% in the period between December and February. Wage growth excluding bonuses meanwhile dipped from 6.1% in January to 6% in February.
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey on Tuesday said he saw “strong evidence” that higher interest rates were working to tame the rate of price rises, which has cooled from a peak of 11.1% in October 2022. The central bank’s own forecast is for inflation to “briefly drop” to its 2% target in the spring before increasing slightly.
But a higher-than-expected March core print firmly above 4% is likely to increase speculation that inflation is proving stickier than recent forecasts have suggested, and the timing of the first interest rate cuts may be moving further down the line.
Market pricing currently suggests the BOE will implement two interest rate cuts in 2024 from its current rate of 5.25%, starting in August or September. Uncertainty over this timeline has now increased, given signs of continued inflationary pressures in the U.S.
‘The U.S. direction’
Camille de Courcel, head of European rates strategy at BNP Paribas, on Wednesday told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” that the latest data showed that the U.K. was “going in the U.S. direction” and provided a risk to her call for a June rate cut from the BOE.
While labor data surprised to the downside, the ONS has cautioned its month-on-month figures may be skewed by methodological issues. That means the BOE’s Monetary Policy Committee will be far more focused on upside surprises on wage growth and services, de Courcel said.
The British pound moved higher against both the U.S. dollar and euro following the announcement, trading up 0.1% against the greenback at $1.243 and 0.15% stronger against the euro at 1.1718.
U.K. Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt, who is gearing up for a national election this year, said on social media platform X that the inflation data was “welcome news.”
“IT’LL BE somewhere between a scalpel and a sledgehammer,” was how Mike Johnson, speaker of the House, described the emerging Republican approach to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Joe Biden’s signature climate law. Pressure from companies and congressmen with clean-energy projects benefiting from its subsidies in their districts (most are found in Republican counties) suggested surgical precision would prevail. But relentless pressure to abolish the IRA from the president, who is a fan of drilling, baby, drilling and denounced the law as the “Green New Scam,” pointed instead to brute force. The president reinforced this by dropping in on a private party caucus on May 20th to strong-arm waverers and threaten dissenters with a MAGA primary challenge. “They won’t be Republicans much longer…they’d be knocked out so fast,” he declared.
Accept, for a moment, Joe Biden’s contention that he is as mentally as sharp as ever. Then try to explain some revelations of the books beginning to appear about his presidency: that he never held a formal meeting to discuss whether to run for a second term; that he never heard directly from his own pollsters about his dismal public standing, or anything else; that by 2024 most of his own cabinet secretaries had no contact with him; that, when he was in Washington, he would often eat dinner at 4.30pm and vanish into his private quarters by 5.15; that when he travelled, he often skipped briefings while keeping a morning appointment with a makeup artist to cover his wrinkles and liver spots. You might think that Mr Biden—that anyone—would welcome as a rationale that he had lost a step or two. It is a kinder explanation than the alternatives: vanity, hubris, incompetence.
AMERICA’S SUPREME COURT appears unusually uncertain about how to resolve Trump v CASA—a case that could redefine who qualifies as an American citizen and reshape the limits of judicial power. At issue is the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for “all persons born or naturalised” in America. For more than 125 years this has been understood to grant automatic citizenship to almost everyone born on American soil (the children of diplomats and soldiers of invading armies are exceptions). Donald Trump has issued an executive order that claims the clause was never intended to apply to children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa-holders.