Connect with us

Accounting

US carmakers push for EV tax credits to be phased out

Published

on

Automakers are lobbying against Washington lawmakers ending popular electric-vehicle tax credits that President Donald Trump has railed against, pushing instead for a gradual phase-out over several years if he moves to cut them. 

General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. are among the carmakers and industry lobbying groups making pilgrimages to ask the Trump administration and Republican legislators to preserve some EV incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act passed under Joe Biden, according to people familiar with the effort who weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

Among the options being floated if the Trump administration moves to strike EV incentives is a three-year wind-down to allow more time for the companies to adjust their businesses, these people said.

It’s not immediately clear if Trump is receptive to the idea, or whether automakers can find enough votes among Republicans in Congress to keep EV incentives in place. But the industry is making the case that thousands of jobs now rely on electric vehicles, and that a disproportionate number of EV and battery plants are in Republican states such as Ohio, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama, making what’s now sometimes referred to as the U.S. “Battery Belt.”

The effort shows how big auto companies are working to influence key policies beginning to take shape in Trump’s Washington that could deal a blow to their operations and bottom lines. Automakers have spent billions of dollars to build EV and battery manufacturing plants in the U.S., helped by IRA subsidies that support production and consumer demand for plug-in cars. Trump has directed his administration to consider eliminating policies that favor electric vehicles, which could put those investments at risk of being stranded should near-term federal support disappear. 

Carmakers also are looking to avert or mitigate the effects of new potential tariffs that at least one industry leader has warned would be devastating to U.S. carmakers. 

To preserve EV subsidies, carmakers are also stressing that a multiyear phase-out period would give them time to drive battery and EV costs down so they can reduce prices and sell electric vehicles without help from the federal government, the people said. Federal support also helps give domestic automakers a chance to build an American-made supply chain to better compete with China.

“We have the potential repeal of various IRA elements,” Ford Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley said Tuesday at an investor conference in New York. “We’ve already sunk capital. And many of those jobs will be at risk” if the IRA or large parts of it are repealed, he said.

Farley said he’ll meet with members of Congress this week, which he said will be his second trip to Washington in three weeks.

Tax credits

The IRA contained a 10-year extension of both consumer tax credits for EV buyers and subsidies that go directly to manufacturers for building batteries in the U.S.

Many automakers are asking to preserve as much of the IRA incentives as they can. That includes the so-called leasing loophole, which allows leased EVs to qualify for the full $7,500 tax credit that would otherwise be ineligible if purchased outright.

GM CEO Mary Barra recently met with Trump to discuss tariffs and other administrative policies that affect the auto industry. The company has pushed to apply the same sourcing standards to incentives toward leasing EVs that are currently applied to purchases, so that battery materials and production would have to be in the U.S. or come from certain trading partners, one of the people said. If GM gets its way, Asian and European automakers would have a tougher time leasing EVs.

The automakers’ campaigning for credits contrasts with Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk’s calls for EV subsidies to be eliminated. In the years since he’s said the federal incentives should be scrapped, Tesla cut prices of vehicles including the Model X in order to qualify. The company also promotes the tax-credit eligibility of various models on its order pages.

Any cuts or repeal of EV credits provided by the IRA would likely come in a reconciliation bill where Republicans will have to weigh the benefits of falling in line with Trump’s priorities against potential drawbacks for high-paying jobs in their states. About $167 billion has been invested to create 200,000 EV-related manufacturing jobs in 12 states, according to the American EV Jobs Alliance, an advocacy group. 

The GOP represents congressional districts with 19 of 25 major automaker battery and EV assembly plants in operation or under construction. Most of the remaining facilities in Democratic Party-represented districts are in states that supported Trump in the November election.

The concentration of EV facilities in Republican states has fueled hopes in the industry that IRA subsidies supporting battery production are more likely to survive than the consumer-facing tax credits.

Autos Drive America, which lobbies for foreign-owned carmakers, has said that preserving both the consumer credit for EVs and the manufacturing credits for domestic battery manufacturing are among its top legislative priorities for the year. Some carmakers have argued that eliminating the tax credits that bolster consumer demand will undermine the new EV and battery plants that are concentrated in Republican states.

Trump’s pledge to eliminate EV tax credits comes with a carrot for automakers: He wants to weaken Biden-era fuel efficiency rules that would effectively require half of all new car sales in 2032 to be battery-electric. Easing those rules would lessen the pressure on companies to sell more EVs.

That could in turn reduce the need for federal incentives and discounts to support EV sales, GM Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson said during an investor presentation on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending