Connect with us

Accounting

Building a better sales pipeline

Published

on

Dobek pipeline.jpg

As firms grow, they need to move their sales pipeline from inside their head into a more formal process, says Sarah Dobek of Inovautus Consulting, to gather the right data and hold everyone involved accountable for growth.

Transcription:

Transcripts are generated using a combination of speech recognition software and human transcribers, and may contain errors. Please check the corresponding audio for the authoritative record.

Dan Hood (00:04):
Welcome to the Air with the accounting. Today I’m editor-in-chief Dan Hood. It can take dozens of contacts with a prospect before they become a full fledged client and it’s way too easy to lose track of them in that long process unless you have a well structured sales pipeline here to talk about what that is and why your firm should have one. And even if you do have one, how do make it better is Sarah Dobek. She’s the president and founder of Inovautus Consulting and a well-known consultant to accounting firms. Sarah, thanks for joining us.

Sarah Dobek (00:28):
Thanks Dan for having me.

Dan Hood (00:30):
Alright, I want to dive right into this. I know a lot of people on listening, we’ll probably know what a sales pipeline is, but let’s give everybody a basic understanding of what it’s all about.

Sarah Dobek (00:41):
So a sales pipeline really is a visual representation of the stages that potential clients will move through from initial contact to becoming a client, whether it’s a client or a prospective client to the firm. It really talks about their buying journey within the firm. And what it does is it helps facilitate this conversation around firms tracking progress, identifying bottlenecks, and quite honestly forecasting future revenue.

Dan Hood (01:12):
Do firms have them? Do a lot of firms have them? Do you find most of your clients have them, for instance? Or do you go in and find a lot of firms that are like, or, Hey, here’s the real question. Do a lot of firms say they have them and then you look at it and you’re like, well, no, no, no, no. That’s not all.

Sarah Dobek (01:26):
So do a lot of firms have sales pipelines? Yes. I would say that there are a lot of firms that do have sales pipelines. I think firms have them, whether they realize ’em or not, they don’t always document them, but every firm has a buying process, whether you are paying attention to who’s in that pipeline, whether you’re doing something with that information, that’s probably the better question is whether that’s happening. And to answer a question that’s part of evolution and growth. If you’re a sole proprietor, it’s all on your head. You don’t need typically an Excel spreadsheet. If you have reminders or to-dos or whatever, that’s fine. But the larger you become, the more important this becomes in being able to manage growth inside of your firm. Gotcha.

Dan Hood (02:09):
And obviously, I mean that’s assuming every firm wants to grow at least somewhat, at least to replace the attrition that happens every year. Is there more beyond the style? You said when you’re small, you can keep it in your head. Why do we need to have it out on a piece of paper as we get bigger on a system in a piece of software or whatever the case may be?

Sarah Dobek (02:30):
Yeah, I think one of the biggest mistakes we see of growth is just lack of execution. We forget because we’re all human, at the end of the day, we all have a million things vying for our attention. And so one of the things that we’ve found is it enhances accountability, a great deal towards growth, and it keeps the team focused and motivated around growth, especially if we’ve established growth goals in our firm, whether that be at a firm wide level, practice area level or individual level, it US stay really organized around that information. The other thing that it does is it enhances forecasting By tracking our prospects and existing expansion of client services, firms can more accurately forecast future revenue, whether we’re going to hit our growth goals for the year, they can help plan for capacity inside of the firm. If we know that we are on track to hit our goal or exceed our goal, well guess what?

(03:27):

Now we can go to the HR and the recruiting team and say, look, here’s what we need. This is what we’re planning. We need to start hiring now because this is a service-based people business. This isn’t that we turn up production, we have to have the people to turn up production in an accounting firm. And then the other thing it does is it increases our efficiency. So it brings a line of sight to our bottlenecks and places where we’re breaking down in our sales process where things aren’t converting the way that they’re supposed to or even protecting our bandwidth. What are we bringing in the door? Is it the right business for the firm? And so there’s a lot of things that our sales pipeline can really do to support our growth in the firm.

Dan Hood (04:09):
And you mentioned this, you described it as the journey of the client potential client. Are there ways of becoming a client whether they know they’re going to become a client or not? Maybe you talk about, and I realize this will vary very differently by firm size even by type of client, but are there a set of stages that the average client will pass through in a pipeline?

Sarah Dobek (04:29):
Yeah, I mean when we think about the buying process that usually the pipeline stages can be a little bit more granular, but there’s this idea of people having this idea that something’s wrong, there’s a problem that they need to solve in their business, and that can be triggered from a lot of different things depending on the surface. And so we generally align that with lead generation and qualification in the sales process. Lead generation is usually like we’re identifying and capturing a potential client through various marketing or networking activities. There’s been some indication of engagement with the firm. Qualification is when they’re giving some indication of being in a buying process and we have to further qualify whether they actually are, they’re sort of what we call just kicking the tires. They’re doing research but they’re not really ready to purchase. Once we’ve brought them through a qualification stage and we’ve actually had contact with them, then we go through this process of some sort of a needs analysis.

(05:31):

We’re doing discovery calls with them. Sometimes that’s one call, sometimes that’s a half dozen calls to figure out what it is that they need. And part of that includes scoping of the services, right? For firms that might be looking at past tax returns or audited financial statements, it might be looking at their accounting system. If we’re talking about cas S, but getting to the point where we can accurately say, these are the services, we can price those services and put them into a proposal or a modified proposal some way to give them pricing around what we’re doing and what we’re going to be doing for them. And we often call that a proposal. And some firms use proposals, some don’t. Different markets sort of require different things here. Once that proposal’s delivered, then we’re typically waiting to get feedback from them. Sometimes we’re negotiating, what’s it going to be?

(06:21):

We’re like, you know what? I don’t know if we can quite afford that. What else can we do? What are some of the other options as how we can work with you? And then there’s the closing, it’s usually the verbal commitment to go forward. And then from there, the firms usually go through whatever client acceptance process. They may or may not have defined in their onboarding depending on what services they provide. So whether we’re doing conflict checks, we’re setting up engagement letters, we’re doing any other checks that we need to on the background to be able to actually onboard them as a client. And then we go through the onboarding procedures.

Dan Hood (06:54):
Got, and I’m just curious, is that sort of the end of it, right? Once we’ve got you onboarded, you’re no longer in the pipeline, now you’re somebody else’s. I mean obviously everyone cares deeply about the firm’s clients, but they’re fully out of the pipeline. Now you’re a client, we’re going to go back and look at some other people who’ve done business with.

Sarah Dobek (07:10):
They’re fully out of the pipeline until they start the process over. Existing clients can raise a hand and give an indication of additional services or consulting needs that they have. And the second that happens, they go right back into the pipeline. Because we look at the pipeline as not just new clients but new revenue and new revenue can come from existing clients or new clients to the firm. And so for every firm that we work with, we say the second they show an interest, if they call you and say, Hey Dan, I have a new entity that we need to complete tax work for, right? Guess what? They’re going back through the pipeline. Or Oh, guess what? We identified some gifting strategies we need to do before the end of the year. Guess what that’s going in the pipeline.

Dan Hood (07:50):
Got you. Because important, as you say, it’s a revenue tracker as much as it is an actual new client tracker. So keeping all of that in that place is going to be pretty crucial. We talked in an earlier podcast, we talked about KPIs for growth. And if you’re not catching that, I guess that would be something, a big thing that would be missing from your KPIs if you’re not getting what’s called the cross-selling revenue, the holy grail of so many pharmacy states is to sell a lot more services to the same set of clients. So they’ve got to go back into the pipeline, obviously for them it they’re not feeling like they’re back to the pipeline, hates boring, internally measured. That is very cool.

(08:30):

There’s so much more I would like to, we could talk about that, but as with all of our podcasts we’ve talked about there’s limited time and we do need to take a quick break. But when we come back, I want to talk about gathering the state and how it’s put together and how it’s reviewed and who looks at it and and all that sort of stuff. For now though, we’ll take a quick break. Alright. And we’re back with Sarah Dobek of Inovautus Consulting. We’ve been talking about what’s in a sales pipeline, what gets tracked in it, how when clients and prospective clients get into it and how they might end up going back into it. Because the important things to we sort of said, right, is that it gives you the ability to track future potential revenue so that you can make plans based around whether staffing broken capacity or which is all very cool stuff. But I want to talk a little bit more about the practicalities of it, practicalities of maintaining the pipeline and that sort of thing. Who should be in charge of this to the firm? Is there a natural place for this to live or is a collaboration between a bunch of different departments?

Sarah Dobek (09:29):
So often it’s sitting in the marketing and sales department of an accounting firm. And if we don’t have a large team, sometimes that could be living within a partner in charge of growth or managing partner. Oftentimes growth falls on the managing partner’s responsibility until they become a certain size. And we have a partner carved off and dedicated to overseeing that function. But usually it’s going to sit there and typically where you’re going to look to that person is to help support tracking of that information and overseeing the reporting around all of that. It takes a fair amount of corralling and administration to get the data that we’re looking for because we know all accountants listen the first time and are super good about falling process and procedures. So it doesn’t take any hurting of anything.

Dan Hood (10:24):
Hold on a second. I got to catch my breath there. That’s a bold and sweeping state better. Sorry.

Sarah Dobek (10:32):
There’s a little bit of passive aggressive underlying tone there. It’s just S in good joke, but in reality it does take that because we’re busy at the end of the day and we should have somebody corralling that function. We should have somebody helping to support those things in the accounting firm. But it is a big evolution for firms to be able to track this

Dan Hood (10:54):
Information. And we’ve talked at different times about the difficulty of gathering information from across the firm, whether it’s coming from practice management systems or CRM systems or from the email systems of individual partners. You said something that might get you into a sales pipeline is just saying to somebody at a firm, oh, I didn’t know you guys did that. I’d like to know more about that. Because doing so, we need help in that area. So there’s a lot of different areas where this information can be coming from A couple of ‘EM central ones obviously, but there’s also a lot of different other places where little bits and pieces of it. How do you gather all that information? How do you make sure you’re getting what you need to get? How do you know what’s out there? Maybe one way to start.

Sarah Dobek (11:35):
Yeah, so I think first having a centralized system to put it in is really important. A CRM system’s really critical to support this. It used to be years ago that we really supported starting with an Excel document to create behavior change. But to be honest, the technology is so advanced that just getting it into a technology system and there’s a lot of lower cost entry level CRM systems that can be a good place to gather that. I will say equally important to that is the process. The reason that this often breaks down, all joking aside, around following process and procedure is typically due to a lack of good process and clarity and reinforcement. One of the things that we work with in a lot of firms when we do the CRM implementation is the process adoption around this. And it can take a year plus to give the behavior change that we need out of all individuals because we may only touch it a couple times a month. It’s really hard to create a habit when we don’t touch it as frequently. If we’re a salesperson and we’re in there daily, we’ll have it knocked out in three to four weeks. We’ll be good, we’ll be comfortable with, but if you’re a partner and you’re only touching it a couple times a month, realistically it’s going to take a lot longer. You’re going to forget until you need it. And so being able to align that process is really important. But also having the supportive leadership is really important around that process too.

Dan Hood (13:02):
Assuming you’re getting all the information you need, right, at some point it’s not just about putting the information in, it’s about doing something with it. And one of the things you hear people talking about people who are really good with their sales pipeline is the regular reviewing them. It’s not just getting the information in there and hoping somebody looks at it. You want to proactively be keeping track of it. Sort of like you keep track of all kinds of other KPIs going on at your firm on a daily basis. How often should firms be looking at that at a pipeline? Is it a weekly thing? Is it daily and everything may change, change by role, obviously?

Sarah Dobek (13:33):
Yeah, so I would say that weekly is probably a touch much for accounting firms that the pace at which people buy isn’t that frequent. So you usually recommend pipeline meetings at some level. And what that looks like for each firm is a little bit different, but about once a month, sometimes we flex around extension season or busy season and things like that, which really quite honestly is when we should be paying attention to most of this. But once a month, I think that if you were managing the pipeline and the data inside of it as a professional, looking at it every couple of weeks at a minimum is probably where I’d be doing that. And then the larger analysis around what’s our stage conversion look like, really looking at that month over month or even a deep dive once a quarter to look at that.

(14:23):

Our conversion rates, what’s happening with the data, what is the data telling us is really important. We look at numbers for forecasting every month. We look at where we’re going, but we really analyze that on a quarterly basis to say, are we on track or are we not? Because there will be a pattern in that data that starts to emerge if we’re off track. And that will become very apparent after month two in that pattern. And if it’s off base at month three, I’m going, something’s wrong here. It’s not just a timing issue. And a lot of times that’s what it is, is it’s a timing issue in accounting firms. So our cash, our invoices didn’t go out last month. They’re going out this next month, so this one’s going to look different compared to last month and our year over year comparison. So I think that’s really important that at an individual level, looking at our sales to dos every week to two weeks to make sure we’re following up on our actions. And that’s really what the pipeline brings is some accountability to facilitate the conversations. If I can’t tell you how many times I’m in a meeting pulling up a pipeline and saying, how is this opportunity going? Oh shoot, I need to follow up with them. I haven’t heard from them in a few weeks. So that accountability piece, that’s where the magic happens because sales is all about execution and that simple prompting of an email is what could cause the deal to close.

Dan Hood (15:48):
Right, right. Well, and it’s fascinating though because in addition to doing that, being that sort of prompted nudge and reminder for the sales team or whoever’s looking at it, it could be a reminder for the partner to go out and say, oh yeah, I’m going to talk to ’em. But it’s also, those are all important because in the end, the data that coming out of that can also inform your revenue expectations, which has got to change your strategic thoughts at the very top of the firm. So I mean, whether you’re hitting your growth goals, they don’t have the time necessarily to look deeply into the pipeline, but they can look and say, yes, pipeline is saying revenue numbers are going to be in good shape or not.

Sarah Dobek (16:25):
Absolutely. Yeah. I mean a regular cadence is probably most important. And when firms start this journey, that cadence can look a little bit different. I would also say that as firms grow, how they review the data, where that review sits looks a lot different, right? When we have practice groups that have really evolved, we review a very narrow view of what that is, a practice group level. We have managing partners that as they meet with their partner group, pull up their progress against their own individual business development goals, we empower our partners through CRM system to have dashboards of their own goals. They should all know exactly where they’re at at any given point in time and be able to pull that information up. And that’s part of the power of having it in a CRM system is the ability to be able to do those things.

(17:14):

And when we see that is when we see the most successful adoption of CRM is when we’re actually using the information because the partners are then understand how this is helping them and it doesn’t become what we hear is an administrative burden and it’s reframed as this is something that’s going to help us. This is critical to our growth. So the adoption of this is all joking aside to what I said earlier, this isn’t something we’re having to pull and drag out of them to get updated. It’s just adopted and it’s used and there’s not an issue with them putting the data into the system because they understand it and they see the value in it.

Dan Hood (17:52):
Well, that’s the thing, right? Once they start to see the value, then they understand the necessity for original, it is a little bit of a burden, but you start to understand the value of why you want to do it. It’s fascinating stuff. And as you say, every firm has one. It’s just a question of many cases of getting it out of somebody’s head and getting it down on some kind of system where you can share it, where people can follow through on it and really make sure that it’s a useful tool as opposed to just something you keep in the back of your head and remember if you number of point. Very cool stuff. Any final thoughts? Anything as people look to take their sales pipeline and take it to the next level? Any final thoughts for them?

Sarah Dobek (18:34):
The only final thoughts I would have is process is really important. And I think sometimes we get stuck on what it should be. And there’s tons of great examples in the profession of how firms have different processes and what works inside of our culture. And so knowing your firm, knowing what’s going to work and what will be successful, that’s how we get the right adoption. That’s how we get to the end result. And the outcome that we’re looking for to be able to do some of these things is understanding that I sat through a great conversation yesterday with a firm that had less ideal process than what you might typically describe, but it worked really well for them. And so I want to encourage firms that are listening to this to figure out what that process is going to be and what that might look like for your firm. And lean into that and don’t get stuck on what we think success looks like with CRM and sales pipelines, which is like everybody has to enter their own data and it all has to look exactly like this. There’s some best practices for sure, but you can find success in creating a process that works for your firm.

Dan Hood (19:45):
Yeah, actually that’s awesome because all the best implementations of whatever it is. Start by saying what works here and what do we need here? And making sure that we’re not just leveling everything. You’re getting rid of baby with the bath water style, getting rid of everything just to put in this new system. It takes account for the things that work already. So very cool. Great advice. Alright, Sarah Dobek with Inovautus consulting. Thank you so much.

Sarah Dobek (20:09):
Alright, thanks Dan for having me.

Dan Hood (20:11):
Thank you all for listening. This episode of On the Air was produced by Accounting Today with audio production by Wen-Wyst Jeanmary. Review us on your favorite podcast platform and see rest of our content on accountingtoday.com. Thanks again to our guest and thank you for listening.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending