Accounting
Partnerships get options for fixing tax errors
The Internal Revenue Service has been
In October, a
The centralized audit regime is probably the best known change for partnerships under the BBA, but there are others that partners should keep in mind when it comes to their tax returns.
In general, a partnership that’s subject to the BBA’s centralized partnership audit regime can’t file amended returns or amended Schedule K-1s, but instead needs to file an administrative adjustment request, or AAR, to make a change to a previously filed partnership return.
“In order to correct errors in partnership returns, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changed the rules,” said Rochelle Hodes, Washington National Tax Office principal at the Top 25 Firm Crowe LLP. “There are no more amended returns. Everybody has to use the AAR process, except those few taxpayers who have elected out of the BBA regime. Election out of the regime is very limited. Tiered partnerships can’t elect out. Partnerships with trusts and partners with disregarded entities can’t elect out. Partnerships who have S corps with partners in some cases can elect out. But for the most part, unless you have a partnership that has all individuals or all C corporations as partners, they’re going to be covered by BBA, and they’re not going to be able to do amended returns anymore, so they’re going to have to use this AAR process for correction of errors.”
The AAR process may be unfamiliar to many firms. “Even though the rules have been in effect generally for partnership taxable years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2018, a lot of taxpayers and practitioners are only now just dipping a toe into having to use these new procedures,” said Hodes. “Historically, a lot of partnerships did not amend returns, and if they did, they would send out amended returns and corrected K-1’s. Under the new process, a different set of forms gets filed and effectively the adjustment to the prior year and the tax resulting therefrom is figured on a pro forma kind of basis. You figure out how much tax difference there is when you correct the error, and then you take that tax difference and you move it up to the ‘current year.’ That’s when you pay the tax that results.”
When there’s a mistake that’s not a numeric error like an incorrect amount of income, but instead the partnership neglected to attach a form or make a Section 754 election to adjust the basis of property, then it needs to follow the new AAR process. The American Institute of CPAs has
“When nothing else is changed on the return and you just forgot to attach the statement, you have to do this more complicated AAR process to attach the statement,” said Hodes.
However, there may be help on the way. “It’s my understanding that the IRS is going to be coming out with a more streamlined process for correcting errors like that,” said Hodes. “It’s something that AICPA has been asking for for a number of years now. The AICPA calls it the AAR-EZ, like the easy form. And it’s my understanding that’s something that is close to coming out, so that should be welcomed.”
The 2015 BBA law made it easier for the IRS to audit a large complex partnership such as a private equity firm, changing the rules previously enacted under the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, also known as TEFRA. But the process for formulating the regulations for the centralized audit regime has taken years to play out, as lobbying groups for PE firms and hedge funds lobbied lawmakers on Capitol Hill to weaken the rules. They have options such as the “pushout election.”
“Partnerships are not taxpaying entities,” said Hodes. “Previously for the IRS to collect any tax due, generally under TEFRA, they would audit the partnership, make adjustments to items, and then the IRS had to flow those adjustments through and find taxpaying partners, and those taxpaying partners then had an opportunity to, in many cases, go to the Tax Court and challenge whether they owed the amounts or not, so the IRS didn’t get their money right away. What the BBA does is it says, look, let’s get this tax thing all set up. We’ll do a stand-in for the tax that would have been owed. We’ll do it close enough, and we’ll take all the adjustments that the IRS made, we’ll multiply it by the highest rate, which happens at this point in time to be 37%, and the partnership can pay the tax, and we’ll call it a day, and that will be much easier, so the IRS won’t have to do any of that work, and the individual partners won’t be able to challenge, and the fisc will be protected. When the BBA rules legislation was first being drafted, that’s how the rules lined up. But groups went to the Hill and said, ‘But that’s not fair, because if you take into account the individual partners’ particular circumstances, the tax that’s going to get paid is far less, and there should be a system to allow the individual partner’s circumstances to be taken into account.’ And thus, the pushout election was born.”
A partnership filing an AAR can decide whether to pay any tax attributable to taking the adjustments into account (called an imputed underpayment) or push the adjustments out to the reviewed year partners, according to an
“Under TEFRA the IRS had to flow through the adjustments to the partners, and it was a lot of work for the IRS and a lot of man hours for the IRS, and they could only do so few because of all that work,” said Hodes. “The burden has now shifted to the partnership. If you want to flow it through partnership, you and all the partners in the tiers will now have to bear that burden, and they flow through the adjustments.”
A pushout can occur in the context of an examination, an IRS audit or an AAR. “An audit is when the IRS makes adjustments,” said Hodes. “An AAR is when the partnership, on its own, makes an adjustment. And in the case of an AAR, Congress made the decision in statute and said, You know what? If those adjustments are taxpayer favorable, the partnership must push out those adjustments if you’re doing an AAR. If you’re correcting something because you didn’t give your partners enough of the good stuff, we have made the policy call in Congress that if you’re going to do it yourself, you need to send that good stuff out to the partners. In my experience, most AARs involve a pushout, and that is a big part of what’s making these AARs so complex. In many cases, an AAR is going to have both taxpayer favorable and some taxpayer unfavorable items. But so long as you have a tax favorable item, you’ve got to do the push, so why not just push everything? It is a rare circumstance where I have seen the partnership pay the [imputed underpayment] and not do a pushout.”
The IRS has made efforts to crack down on tax evasion by large partnerships, but that could change with the incoming Trump administration. On Wednesday, President-elect Trump announced that he would be
“You previously had an audit rate of partnerships of zero or quite near zero,” said Hodes. “Meanwhile, over the past 50 or 40 years, we have seen more and more assets in the economy flow through partnership structures, as opposed to corporate structures. But partnerships are complex.”
The AAR process and the pushout election made large partnership audits even more complicated for the IRS. She noted that the regulations in
“It’s a good thing to keep in mind,” said Hodes. “I had a boss who once told me that the ability to correct mistakes is the reason why pencils have erasers, and 9100 relief processes are intended to not punish people for ministerial oops’s. It’s just something to keep in mind that there are opportunities to obtain relief.”
She also pointed out that the IRS is offering extensions in many parts of the country that have been affected by natural disasters. “There were a lot of disasters in 2024, and due dates and such have been extended,” said Hodes. “When you think you might have been late, you might not have been late in filing or with payment. As you go through and look to see if you have errors, it’s important to keep in mind opportunities for relief through the disaster rules as well, if they’re applicable.”
The Senate Finance Committee questioned Billy Young, President Trump’s nominee for Internal Revenue Service commissioner, about his plans for the beleaguered agency and promotion of dubious “tribal tax credits” and Employee Retention Tax Credits during a long-awaited confirmation hearing Tuesday after a series of acting commissioners temporarily held the role.
Trump
Long insisted during the confirmation hearing that he would defend the integrity of the IRS and maintain an open door policy, emulating the example of former commissioner Charles Rossotti, who served from 1997 to 2002.
“If confirmed, I will implement a comprehensive plan aimed at enhancing the IRS, but also one that develops a new culture at the agency,” he said in his opening statement. “I am eager to implement the necessary changes to maximize our effectiveness, while also remaining transparent with both Congress and taxpayers. It is important to also recognize the dedicated professionals currently at the IRS whose hard work too often goes unnoticed. It is my pledge that we will invest in retaining skilled members of the team. This does not mean a bloated agency, but an efficient one where employees have the tools they need to succeed.”
Committee chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, expects to see changes at the agency. “Congressman Long is very clear that he will make himself available to all IRS employees, no matter their seniority,” Crapo said in his opening statement. “Moreover, he wants to implement a top-down culture change at the agency. This sea change will benefit American taxpayers, who too often view the IRS as foe, rather than friend. Congressman Long knows, from years of experience in the House, that to be a successful Commissioner, he must be a valuable partner in Congress’ efforts to ensure that new tax legislation is implemented and administered as Congress intends it to be. I am also confident that he will be fully transparent and responsive to Congress and the American people.”
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, the top Democrat on the committee, questioned Long about his promotion of “tribal tax credits” and the fraud-plagued ERTC. “Most of Congressman Long’s experience with tax issues came after he left Congress, when he dove headlong into the tax scam industry,” he said in his opening statement. “Cashing in on the credibility of his election certificates, he raked in referral fees steering clients to firms that sold faked tax shelters and pushing small businesses to unknowingly commit tax fraud.”
Wyden asked Long about the $65,000 he earned from referring friends to tax promoters who claimed they had acquired income tax credits issued to a Native American tribe and then sold the tax credits to investors. “There’s a problem. The IRS said in March that the credits do not exist. They’re fake. They are a scam. Now you’re asking to be put in charge of the IRS, and the IRS confirms that these aren’t real. Tell the committee, do you believe these so-called tribal tax credits actually exist?”
Long insisted his only involvement with the credit was to connect interested friends and offer to put them on a Zoom call with someone, but he was not on the Zoom calls himself. Wyden pressed him on whether the tax credits actually exist.
“I think the jury’s still out on that,” Long admitted. “I know since 2022 they’ve been accepting them, so now they claim that they’re not. I think that all this is going to play out, and I want to have it investigated, just as you do. I know you’re very interested in this subject. I am too.”
Wyden also asked about
Wyden then asked him about his work with promoters of the Employee Retention Tax Credit. “You stated on a YouTube video that everybody qualifies for the Employee Retention Tax Credit, and you urge listeners to ignore CPAs that said they didn’t qualify. Do you really think everybody qualifies?”
“If you listen to that video, I hate to correct you, but I didn’t say everyone qualifies,” Long responded. “I said virtually everyone qualifies, meaning most people.”
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, and other Democrats also questioned Long about whether he would follow Trump’s orders to audit certain taxpayers or remove the tax-exempt status of organizations, even if it violated the law. Long insisted he would follow the law but declined to explicitly say whether he would defy an order from Trump.
“I don’t intend to let anybody direct me to start an audit for political reasons,” he said.
Minnesota approved a bill on Monday night to create additional pathways to CPA licensure, and it awaits the signature of Gov. Tim Walz.
As part of an omnibus bill,
The bill sunsets the current 150-hour credit rule after June 30, 2030, and establishes automatic mobility and practice privileges one day following the bill’s ratification. All candidates must still pass all parts of the CPA exam.
Jill Clardy/stock.adobe.com
“It’s a step forward in the right direction,” said Geno Fragnito, government relations director at the Minnesota Society of CPAs. “It allows some flexibility to hopefully bring in people who are on the fence about whether they could afford the extra year of education and whether the accounting profession fit into their long-term goals because of that.”
Generally, the governor has 14 days to act on the presented bill. Otherwise, without any action, the bill becomes law. Minnesota is one of
(Read more:
Minnesota was the first state to propose licensing changes in December 2022.
“Initial strong opposition eventually turned into support as more professionals, state societies, universities, government entities and businesses rallied behind broadening pathways to CPA licensure with the first state, Ohio, passing its law in January,” said an MNCPA
“There were a lot of people — chairs ahead of me and other people on the board and at the Minnesota society — that have done a ton of work on this and really deserve a lot of credit for all of the conversations they had and the testifying they did,” said MNCPA chair Eric O’Link. “We’re very appreciative of our legislative sponsors and everybody who helped make it a reality.”
Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: Palo Alto Networks, Take-Two Interactive and more
Senate panel grills IRS commissioner nominee Billy Long
Minnesota approves CPA licensure changes bill
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Economics1 week agoCPI inflation April 2025: Rate hits 2.3%
-
Economics1 week agoTariff receipts topped $16 billion in April, a record that helped cut the budget deficit
-
Personal Finance6 days agoHouse Republicans advance Trump’s tax bill. ‘SALT’ deduction in limbo
-
Economics5 days agoViolent crime is falling rapidly across America
-
Economics1 week agoGerman business leaders tell new government: It’s time to deliver
-
Personal Finance1 week agoHow to save on groceries amid food price inflation
-
Personal Finance1 week agoFidelity technical issues kept some investors out of their accounts
-
Economics4 days agoThe low-end consumer is about to feel the pinch as Trump restarts student loan collections