Connect with us

Accounting

Trump picks Atkins, ex-SEC commissioner, to succeed Gensler

Published

on

Paul Atkins is President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, suggesting four years of relaxed policy and enforcement for crypto firms to hedge funds.

Trump selected Atkins to replace outgoing Chair Gary Gensler, whose ambitious plans focusing on climate-risk disclosures, crypto crackdowns and stock-trading regulations drew resistance from Wall Street. Gensler has said he plans to depart on Jan. 20.

“Paul is a proven leader for common sense regulations. He believes in the promise of robust, innovative capital markets that are responsive to the needs of Investors, & that provide capital to make our Economy the best in the World,” Trump said in the statement posted on Truth Social on Wednesday.

By selecting the former Republican SEC commissioner, Trump is tapping one of the most influential GOP financial regulation insiders to oversee Wall Street. If confirmed, Atkins is expected to focus on whittling away at regulations and levying lower penalties for violations. Critics are already sounding alarms.

He is an “industry cheerleader who, as a commissioner at the SEC from 2002-2008, supported deregulation that contributed to the devastating 2008 crash,” Dennis Kelleher, co-founder of Better Markets, a financial policy think tank, said in a statement. 

Atkins has been a strong proponent of digital assets and his selection to head the agency comes after Trump embraced cryptocurrency during his campaign. 

Robinhood Markets Inc. legal chief Dan Gallagher said at the firm’s investor day in New York City on Wednesday that Atkins is “the perfect pick for SEC chair.”

Gallagher previously worked for Atkins at the SEC and at Patomak Global Partners, a consulting firm founded by Atkins with major financial industry clients. Patomak has since risen to become one of the most prominent sounding boards for banks, trading firms, fintechs and others seeking guidance on how to influence and respond to Washington’s edicts and investigations.  

Atkins’ history

At the SEC and in the private sector, Atkins has been involved in some of the biggest and most contentious policy issues in finance, such as the influence of proxy advisers on corporate boards and the costs of “disclosure overload,” as well as policies to encourage capital formation. He has testified before Congress on ways to restructure the agency’s operations and reduce what some industry participants consider duplicative or overly burdensome regulations. 

As an SEC commissioner, Atkins spoke out against high penalties levied on companies, saying they ultimately hurt shareholders. He also called out the SEC’s mandate to not only protect investors but to increase competition and efficiency in the markets. The regulator “must not price those very investors out of our markets through burdensome regulations or eat up the fruits of their investments through nonsensical mandates,” Atkins said in a 2007 speech

He also criticized parts of the sweeping reforms contained in the Dodd-Frank legislation that was enacted in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. He testified before a congressional committee about problems with certain big banks getting designated as systemically important financial institutions and the “grab bag” of public company disclosure provisions contained in the law.

Atkins’ leadership would likely be in sharp contrast with Gensler, who rolled out one of the most aggressive SEC agendas in recent memory. Some of Gensler’s marquee rule-makings, however, got stymied by legal challenges.

The SEC under Gensler also levied big fines for regulatory missteps, with record penalties for financial firms using unofficial communication devices to conduct business. Business groups, especially the crypto industry, often complained the SEC under Gensler enacted regulation by enforcement instead of first creating clear rules of the road.

“I think the nomination of Atkins would signal and would be understood as a return to the status quo before Gensler. Back to business as usual for the SEC,” said Alex Platt, a professor at the University of Kansas School of Law.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending