Connect with us

Accounting

Trump widens trade fight to include global taxes, regulation

Published

on

President Donald Trump is embarking on what may be his most disruptive action yet for the global economy by broadening his grievances to how other countries choose to tax and regulate.

Trump on Thursday ordered top economic officials to calculate new U.S. tariffs based on the total tariffs and tax, regulatory, currency and any other barriers that U.S. exports face. The new “reciprocal” duties would be calculated country by country. They will be laid out in a series of reports due by April 1 that officials said would first examine the economies with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits.

“The numbers are going to be very fair but staggering. They’re going to be large,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as he signed a memorandum ordering up the new tariffs.

The move, which Trump said would replace his campaign plan for a universal tariff on imports, immediately puts the European Union and countries including China, India, Mexico and Vietnam in the potential firing line, based on U.S. trade data.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Friday called Trump’s plan a “step in the wrong direction” and an act of self-harm. By raising tariffs, the U.S. “is taxing its own citizens, raising costs for business, stifling growth and fueling inflation,” she said.

Reaction was swift from other major U.S. trading partners. During a joint conference with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday, Trump said the two countries would start trade negotiations. Indian officials Friday said they’re looking to boost oil and gas imports from the U.S. — a vow that countries from Japan to Vietnam have already made.

Asian exporters

In Tokyo on Friday, Japan also said it’s reaching out to Washington to start discussions. Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te pledged to boost military spending in a sign of further cooperation with the US against China. South Korea— which along with Japan was singled out by a White House official on a call with reporters — released a statement highlighting the low effective tariff rate on U.S. goods.

Trump’s plan would, if implemented, mark a departure from how the U.S. has approached tariffs for almost a century and deal a major blow to global trading rules now based on countries granting each other what are known as “most favored nation” tariffs unless they sign special trade deals. It would also turn the definition on its head — reciprocity has up until now referred to lower tariffs on goods.

“Trump is essentially trying to create a justification to impose high tariffs on whoever he wants,” said Sam Lowe, a partner at Flint Global in London, where he heads their trade and market access practice.

Fundamental change, Trump advisers said, is what’s needed. “The idea here is historic and it’s really about a revolution in how the international trading system is organized,” Peter Navarro, a senior trade adviser, told Bloomberg Television.  

With his order Trump is also reaching beyond the usual boundaries of his trade fights to how countries collect taxes, apply regulations and standards, and other so-called non-tariff barriers. 

Trump singled out the use of value-added taxes, which he and his advisors argue give exporters from other countries an unfair advantage over U.S. ones. More than 160 countries in the world use VAT or similar consumption levies, according to the International Monetary Fund. The U.S., however, bases its national taxes on income.

In the EU and other economies that use them, Trump and his advisors argue, the ability to claim a VAT rebate when products are exported gives European companies an unfair advantage as imports from the U.S. are charged VAT of 15-20% or higher depending on the member country. 

“A VAT tax is a tariff,” Trump told reporters Thursday. 

Many economists disagree. “Defining a VAT to be a trade barrier isn’t just questionable economics (the VAT is the same on imports and domestic production), it also basically forecloses negotiation, as the EU and others aren’t in a fiscal position to negotiate away its tax base,” Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former US Treasury official, wrote on X. 

In a note to clients, Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics, said Trump’s plan was likely to have a more damaging impact on the U.S. economy than his previous universal tariff idea.

Just adding the average most-favored nation tariff rate of countries to their VATs would lead to significant reciprocal U.S. tariffs on some of the U.S.’s top trading partners, he wrote. If the U.S. imposes reciprocal tariffs that add VAT rates and MFN tariff rates together, the countries most hit would be India with a rate of 29%, Brazil and the EU. 

Such duties alone, Ashworth wrote, would lead to an increase in the average effective tariffs rate on all U.S. imports from 3% currently to around 20%. It would also lead to a temporary rebound in U.S. inflation to around 4% later this year.

The EU stipulates that countries must apply a VAT rate of no less than 15% on most goods and services, though it leaves decisions on actual levels and exemptions to member states. According to ING calculations, the VAT across the 27-nation bloc averaged 21.5% in 2023.

By targeting VAT the U.S. is relaunching a long-running trade fight. 

The U.S. and Europe have battled over the treatment of VAT and income taxes in global trading rules since the 1960s with the EU challenging multiple mechanisms the U.S. set up in the 1970s and ’80s to offer a similar export rebate on U.S. corporate taxes levied against revenues. The EU eventually won a World Trade Organization challenge to those mechanisms in the 1990s and since then the U.S. has had no similar export rebates. 

Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, said the Trump administration’s view of VAT reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how the tax works. VATs don’t discriminate against foreign goods since domestically produced ones face the same taxes in the countries they are sold, she said.

Consumption taxes

“The goal of a value-added tax is to tax domestic consumption,” York said. “There’s no discrimination based on where something was made. It’s just a tax on the stuff that people in a country are buying.”

But Trump’s grievances with other countries go beyond that by targeting regulations and other non-tariff barriers that U.S. goods face overseas. 

“We’re going to look at everything,” Jamieson Greer, who is due to become U.S. Trade Representative, told reporters on Thursday, including what he called “fake” anti-trust regimes. 

The EU has for years targeted U.S. tech giants like Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google for scrutiny in competition investigations that have led to hefty fines. The U.S. has also long complained about how the EU and other countries like Japan regulate food imports such as beef and chicken, as well as other U.S. exports like chemicals and genetically modified crop seeds.

In the memorandum signed Thursday, Trump ordered officials to include in their tariff calculations “any other practice that” they conclude “imposes any unfair limitation on market access or any structural impediment to fair competition with the market economy of the United States.” 

As with many of Trump’s trade actions, optimists believe that they could lead to trade agreements that will avoid the disruptive economic impact of tariffs likely to provoke retaliation by other countries and lead to higher prices and slower growth. 

John Veroneau, a partner at law firm Covington & Burling LLP who served as a senior trade official in the administration of President George W. Bush, said Trump’s latest move represents a significant broadening out of his trade conflicts. 

“He has raised the stakes. This is now a global enterprise,” Veroneau said, calling it a “huge step” away from the global trading rules first laid out in the 1947 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. 

‘New phase’

The U.S. is signaling “the start of a new phase in global trade” in which the U.S. uses its power not to influence global rules but the bilateral trade in goods, he said. The best hope, Veroneau said, is that the U.S. can negotiate new deals that don’t lead to escalating trade wars over tariffs.

Equities rose in Asia and Europe on Friday, with traders optimistic that the timeline for reciprocal tariffs provided enough room to negotiate. Setser said that shouldn’t last long as investors “will eventually realize that this is a path to real tariff hikes,” he wrote on X. 

Jennifer Hillman, who served as both a senior U.S. trade official and a member of the WTO’s highest court, said the plan laid out by Trump and his advisors would be immensely complex to implement, would likely to lead to chaos and require more funding for border authorities

Interfering in how other countries collect taxes and impose regulations would also inevitably lead to a backlash against the U.S., said Hillman, now a senior fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations.

“We’re just going to make America hated again,” she said. “At some level, for these other countries, it’s just like ‘who are you to tell us that we can’t regulate our own economy?'”

Continue Reading

Accounting

GOP to end clean power credits years earlier in revised bill

Published

on

Subsidies for clean power would end years earlier in a giant tax and spending bill narrowly passed by the Republican-led House of Representatives early Thursday, driving down shares of solar companies including Sunrun Inc.

It now moves to the Senate, where key Republicans have already balked at some of the House’s plans. Some wanted longer transition times before the latest House bill cut those even further.

The House bill is “worse than feared” for clean energy, analysts at Jeffries said in a research note Thursday. They added, however, that “we don’t expect this to last into Senate draft.”

Shares of Sunrun fell 44% in early trading Thursday. SolarEdge Technologies Inc. sank 17%.

The revised text released Wednesday night marked an extended effort to win over Republican dissidents, including fiscal hardliners who wanted deeper cuts to a series of tax credits created under former President Joe Biden’s signature climate law.

The revisions would include ending technology-neutral clean electricity tax credits for sources like wind and solar starting in 2029 and requiring those projects to commence construction within 60 days of the legislation becoming law. The initial version proposed by House Republicans had a longer phase-out time, allowing many of the credits to exist until 2032.

“They would probably amount to a hard shutdown of the IRA,” said James Lucier, managing director at research group Capital Alpha Partners, referring to Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. “The initial version of the Ways and Means bill gave investors some hope they could live under the old regime for another couple of years, but now no more.”

The House bill would also hasten more stringent restrictions that would disqualify any project deemed to benefit China from receiving credits. Under the new version, those restrictions, which some analysts have said could render the credits useless for many projects, would kick in next year.

At the same time, the revised bill would restore “transferability” of a nuclear production tax credit, which would allow a project sponsor to sell tax credits to a third party, according to a summary of the changes. It also lengthens the amount of time the credit remains in place by allowing projects that have started construction but aren’t yet operating to be eligible to receive them, the summary said.

The new bill also would keep the tax credits for advanced nuclear projects and expand existing plants if construction starts by the end of 2028. It also would phase out a consumer tax incentive of as much as $7,500 for the purchase of electric vehicles.

The changes would come on top of limitations on the energy credits that were estimated to save $560 billion in cuts in Inflation Reduction Act spending and could cripple the clean energy industry. 

The legislation is the centerpiece of President Donald Trump’s second term agenda. However it faces a delicate path to become law, and may still be altered further. 

Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski and three colleagues have vowed to defend the credits and called for a “targeted, pragmatic approach.” 

“I am watching right now to see how far the House goes,” Murkowski said in an interview on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill narrowly passes House, overcoming infighting

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s signature tax bill narrowly passed the House Thursday morning, advancing a sprawling multitrillion-dollar package that would avert a year-end tax increase at the expense of adding to the U.S. debt burden.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where groups of Republicans are pressing for extensive change. Lawmakers plan to vote on approval by August. The bill includes a $4 trillion increase in the U.S. debt ceiling, which the Treasury Department forecasts could otherwise force a default as soon as August or September, adding urgency to the timeline.

The 215-214 House vote, with one abstention, was met with cheers from Republicans in the chamber. It followed a furious offensive by Trump, who visited the Capitol to rally Republicans, worked lawmakers by phone late into the night and summoned holdouts to the Oval Office. His budget office released a statement branding any GOP lawmaker who failed to support the package guilty of the “ultimate betrayal.”

Trump took a victory lap on his social media platform Truth Social Thursday morning, calling the One Big Beautiful Bill Act the “the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country!”

“Now, it’s time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! There is no time to waste,” Trump said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson and his lieutenants went through rounds of negotiations steps from the House floor to balance the demands of lawmakers from high-tax states pressing for an increase in the state and local tax deduction. Hardline conservatives insisted on deeper spending cuts and vulnerable swing-district Republicans were wary of slashing Medicaid.

The measure would avoid a blow to U.S. growth just as the economy struggles with the impact of the steepest tariff increases in almost a century, though it’s expected to add hundreds of billions a year to the deficit.

It would extend Trump’s first-term tax cuts due to expire Dec. 31, along with new tax relief including raising the limit on the deduction for state and local taxes to $40,000 and temporarily exempting tips and overtime pay from taxes.

Cuts to safety-net programs such as food stamps and Medicaid health coverage for the poor and disabled could worsen economic inequality even as wealthy Americans gain the largest share of tax cuts. 

Deficits driven by the tax cuts also risk exacerbating bond investors’ concerns about the ballooning U.S. debt, highlighted by Moody’s decision to downgrade the U.S. government’s credit rating.

Democrats vowed to make House Republicans pay a price in next year’s midterm elections, casting the measure as a Robin Hood-in-reverse effort to take from the poor and give to the rich.

“The GOP tax scam will hurt working families the most while delivering massive tax breaks for billionaires like Elon Musk,” said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York.

Republicans counter that their voters will be energized by enactment of Trump’s top legislative priority for the year and reward them politically. 

Spending cuts

Ultraconservative Freedom Caucus members were able to insert new language in the bill that would dramatically speed up the end of clean energy tax credits passed under the Biden administration, which would generally have to be put into service before 2029 and would have to be well under way within 60 days of the bill’s enactment. The hardliners also were able to move up the start date for new Medicaid work requirements to December 2026 from a 2029 start in the initial version of the package.

The acceleration of new Medicaid work requirements could become an issue in the midterm elections — which fall just one month earlier — with Democrats eager to criticize Republicans for restricting health benefits for low-income households.

Johnson was also able to strike an elusive deal with lawmakers from high-tax states on the state and local tax deduction. The deal would raise the $10,000 cap to $40,000 for individuals and joint filers starting this year, with a phase-out for those making more than $500,000 per year. The cap would increase by 1% a year for 10 years.

Other sweeteners were added for states like Texas, which would be the main beneficiary of $12 billion in reimbursements for state border security expenses incurred in recent years. And GOP leaders eliminated a provision that would have cut federal pensions by basing benefits on the highest five years of salary rather than the highest three, in a move cheered by Republican Representative Mike Turner of Ohio, who called the pension cut “unfair.”

The package also imposes tax increases on targets of Trump’s ire such as Harvard University and immigrants. Private universities with large endowments per student would pay a 21% tax on net investment income, up from the current rate of 1.4%. Immigrants would face a new levy on transfers of money to foreign countries.

The bill would boost military spending by $150 billion and add $175 billion for immigration enforcement, both top Trump priorities. It also includes numerous other provisions affecting health care, energy production and manufacturing, reorienting the government away from climate change concerns in favor of fossil fuels.

That includes the elimination of most EV tax credits, including for market leader Tesla, by the end of 2025, replaced by a tax break for auto loan interest for U.S.-built vehicles, a move championed by Trump and Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno.

Late changes to the bill even included changing the name of new savings accounts for babies born in the next few years, to be seeded with $1,000 from the government. It’s now “Trump” accounts instead of “MAGA” accounts.

Republican senators have said they will press for substantial changes before approving the package.

A number of Senate Republicans want to make permanent tax cuts that are now temporary under the package, especially breaks benefiting businesses. Some GOP senators have warned against any cuts to Medicaid. Others have pushed for far deeper overall spending cuts.

Continue Reading

Accounting

A great time to cheat on your taxes

Published

on

I didn’t want to say this before tax season ended, but my guess is this has to be the best time in all the history of the income tax and the Internal Revenue Service to cheat on your taxes.

(Not that anyone should cheat, of course. They definitely shouldn’t; taxes are the price we pay for living in a civilized society, and all that.)

But think about it: The IRS, already weakened by a decade or more of budget cuts that saw their top talent bleeding away through attrition, has lost a tenth of its workforce in just the past few months, and now that tax season is over, all the fired employees who were held over until April 15 will actually be leaving. Its leadership is in shambles, with five commissioners in as many months, and the confirmation hearings for the man who is supposed to take on the job full-time only happening this week, as well as a number of senior leaders resigning over policy differences with the Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency.

(Again, I’m not saying that you should cheat on your taxes — you definitely shouldn’t — but if you wanted to, purely hypothetically speaking, you could hardly pick a better time to do it.)

Taxes-due-reminder-with-money

Audit rates, which were already ridiculously low, can only drop as experienced staff retire or are driven out, leaving no one to train new employees, which is fine because many of those new employees were themselves driven out right at the start of the current purge. Unless you fill out your return in human blood or ask for your refund to be direct-deposited to a numbered Swiss account, the likelihood of your being audited is almost negligible.

(Still, you totally should not cheat on your taxes.)

Now hypothetically, you might be worried that, even though there aren’t enough human staff to come after you, the IRS might be use technology to catch you, but all those staff cuts are hampering the agency’s IT projects too, and much of the money they were supposed to get from the Inflation Reduction Act to help improve their tech has been clawed back, so I wouldn’t worry too much about it.

(Seriously, though, please don’t cheat on your taxes.)

It’s just that it really does seem like a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to cheat. The one agency that can stop you — also the one that delivers almost all of the government’s revenue — has been hobbled so comprehensively that if you were actually planning to create an environment for tax evasion, you could hardly do better. It’s OK to talk about this now, of course, because tax season is over and it’s not like any of the people on extension would want to cheat, or like anyone would try to cheat on their quarterly estimates or on the payroll taxes their company is supposed to hand over because they thought the IRS was so weak it wouldn’t catch them.

No one would do that, right?

Continue Reading

Trending