Connect with us

Accounting

IMA sees role for AI in accounting

Published

on

The Institute of Management Accountants is examining the possibilities of artificial intelligence in the accounting profession and how it will affect finance jobs now and in the future, as the organization itself recently went through a second round of staff cutbacks.

The IMA did not disclose the number of people laid off in February. The organization had an earlier round of reductions in force about two years ago.

“IMA recently implemented a strategic restructuring, which did impact headcount,” said a spokesperson. “Our focus is on positioning IMA for the future — aligned with the needs of our global members. IMA remains committed to our collective growth, and continues to invest in opportunities to advance our organization and profession.”

Institute of Management Accountants headquarters in Montvale, N.J.

The IMA released a report earlier this year on the impact of AI in accounting and finance as technologies like ChatGPT gain widespread acceptance. It points out how AI can automate accounting processes such as accounts payable and receivable, monthly and quarterly closing, expense processing, procurement and supplier management. AI can also help accounting and finance professionals get insights through data analytics to identify trends and strategies.

“Generally speaking, when people talk about AI, it tends to be very theoretical and high level, and what we have found is our members —those that are working in businesses and working with day-to-day processes and procedures and people — really want to understand what’s the practical implication of this new technology on the work that they’re doing,” said IMA president and CEO Mike DePrisco.

For the report, the IMA talked to about 40 finance leaders from around the globe to understand from their perspective, the main challenges, concerns and opportunities related to leveraging AI and emerging technology into finance and accounting. 

deprisco-mike-ima.jpg

Mike DePrisco

“We did a number of focus groups with this group of leaders, and they represent every region of the world,” said DePrisco. “A number of challenges surfaced that were really categorized around four areas: the human aspect, the technology data aspect, operational aspects and ethical and governance aspects.”

One of the worries about AI is the potential for layoffs. “I do think that is probably the biggest concern that many practitioners and organization leaders have as it relates to AI, and that is job displacement,” said DePrisco. “That’s another reason why stakeholders are sometimes hesitant to adopt AI technology in the workplace because of that. Everything that we see and hear suggests that AI will augment and not replace accounting and finance professionals, but the role of what people will do is different in the future than it is today.”

The most cited concern among 38% of the respondents to the IMA survey was the human aspect of working with AI. “The human aspect really is about getting the attention and support from top leadership to invest in and implement AI is a key challenge and a key opportunity for organizations,” said DePrisco. “Those organizations that have full support from leadership — those individuals that control the funding and the allocation of resources to certain projects — those organizations that have that support and alignment have a better chance of getting AI projects implemented successfully. The lack of that support, buy-in and alignment from top leadership was cited as a concern.”

Another concern relates to the skill gaps of individual employees who are required to work with AI. “Many individuals in accounting and finance may not have had exposure to this type of technology, and the challenge therefore in implementing these projects is how do you help upskill finance and accounting professionals and practitioners?” said DePrisco. “How do you give them the tools, skills and knowledge they need to work with the technology individuals and data scientists in the organization, so they are leveraging and building these algorithms, that they’re being built on practical applications or outcomes that the business needs to achieve.”

There’s also a challenge around stakeholder buy-in, with  employees accepting the idea that AI and machine learning are going to add value to the organization and not take away control or displace jobs. 

“Getting that buy-in is a critical challenge and an opportunity,” said DePrisco. 

There are also operational challenges with implementing AI, including cross-functional collaboration. “Implementing AI projects in an organization requires your finance and accounting business people working with your data people and your IT people to ensure that the data going into the machines represents the practical real-world scenarios that accounting and finance individuals are facing and what they need help in, so that when the machine spits out the information and data, it’s useful, reliable and suitable for the needs of the business,” said DePrisco. “Resource management is always a challenge and concern. Do we have enough resources to help ensure that this project is successful? It can’t be something that is just added to someone’s plate as another thing that they need to do and manage. AI projects are pretty complex projects. They’re time-consuming projects. Create space for your team to dedicate time to a successful implementation.”

Organizations may need to reengineer their processes to get good use out of AI. “If your processes are not good, layering in AI on top of bad processes is not going to get you a successful outcome,” said DePrisco. “The first step in implementing any AI project is to look at your processes, and to re-engineer processes in a way that’s going to be added value once you begin to implement the AI technology on top of it. Making sure that you’re rooting out bad processes, reengineering those processes, and taking the time at that point to do it is really the best practice as it relates to that.”

Choosing the right AI technology can also be a challenge. “It takes a lot of investment to bring in AI technology,” said DePrisco. “You have to look at what kind of technical depth you have. What’s needed from an integration perspective before you start making purchases, and starting to think about how you implement AI on top of that?”

Data integrity and maturity are important considerations as well. “Many organizations have data siloed throughout the organization,” said DePrisco. “It’s structured data and unstructured data. How are you bringing all that together and integrating that data and making sure that it’s reliable, clean and trustworthy, so that it can be leveraged and used to develop algorithms?”

Another challenge uncovered by the research centered around ethical and governance concerns. “These concerns are what you hear most about in mainstream media, the importance of data security,” said DePrisco. “How does AI technology impact an organization’s ability to maintain data security and data privacy? How are you governing the AI in your organization? Many organizations that implement these types of projects need to set up an AI Center of Excellence, for example, to ensure that people throughout the organization have visibility into how the AI is being used. What business outcome are you driving toward? What is the cost of implementation and maintenance? And data integrity. Is the data free of bias? Is it reflective of the business problems that you’re trying to solve?”

To help accounting and finance professionals adjust to the far-reaching changes emerging from AI, the IMA is planning to provide more training. “We need to ensure that we’re providing education, knowledge and certification training for practitioners who are moving to new roles,” said DePrisco. “These can be roles like compliance analysts, individuals that utilize AI to ensure the finance operations are adhering to laws and regulations. There are probably going to be new roles in risk assessment and management, that merge financial expertise with AI proficiency, for example, roles that identify bias in data and mitigating that bias.”

He noted that the IMA has long said that accounting and finance professionals are strategic business partners. “The more work is automated, the more opportunities individuals have to step away from some of those manual routine administrative types of tasks that accountants have done over the last 100 years and into that strategic business partner role,” said DePrisco. “That’s so critically important these days to help organizations achieve their outcomes.”

Many accountants are not sure whether it’s a good idea to trust AI systems yet with their clients’ data since programs like ChatGPT have a reputation for “hallucinating” or making up plausible-sounding information that turns out to be partly or wholly fictitious.

“You need knowledgeable accounting and finance people to question the data that comes out of the machines to ensure that it reflects the real-life scenarios that happen day to day and that reflect data that’s correct, accurate and with integrity.” said DePrisco. “That becomes an important role of accounting and finance people. That’s on the back end, but you also need that capability on the front end. And that’s why when I talk about the collaboration, you need experienced, qualified accounting and finance professionals to work with data scientists to build the algorithms that are being used to automate processes and automate a number of these financial processes that are going to create financial statements and other things that the organization is going to rely on. Making sure that the data that’s going in there is accurate, free from bias, and represents both unstructured and structured data that may exist in the organization. It’s the job of the accounting and finance professional to ensure that those algorithms are being built with the proper data. That’s how you mitigate the risk around hallucinations or information coming out that’s half baked.”

AI can be used for tasks like data analytics, to spot patterns and red flags, but it still requires the professional skepticism that an accountant can bring.

“The machines are proving to be very powerful technology that is creating new value, improving efficiency and productivity overall,” said DePrisco. “Like any new technology, there needs to be a healthy dose of skepticism and rigor applied to ensure that we’re not just relying on what a machine spits out, that we’re actually applying critical thinking, bringing our experience, judgment and curiosity to any data that becomes available through a machine. We’ve seen this throughout the years as new technology is adopted. There’s a maturity curve, and we’re still in the early stages of that maturity curve with AI. There will be a lot of learning that happens over time.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending