Connect with us

Accounting

DOGE set to hamstring IRS during tax season

Published

on

IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Whether the Internal Revenue Service lays off merely 7% of its workers or as much as half of its 90,000-member workforce, it is certain that it will affect the ability of the agency to do its job. This is especially so given the timing of its reduction in force during tax season. 

“There’s no exact number yet,” said David Shapiro, partner and chair of the tax, compensation and benefits practice at Saul Ewing LLP. “They started by rescinding the offers of those who were scheduled to start, so that in the Office of Chief Counsel that included law students who were reviewing and drafting regs. Everyone who was probationary was terminated. In addition there were a lot of IRS employees that accepted the deferred resignation offer. They don’t think that a reduction of 7,000 is enough — they want to get rid of a total of 50,000. In the minds of most practitioners, that would be devastating.”

That is already beginning to affect practitioners, according to Shapiro. For example, a colleague had a question for the Office of Chief Counsel: “In normal times, there would have been no problem,” he said. “But due to lack of resources, he was told that they might not be able to rule on his question.”

The cuts are part of the effort by the Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency to reduce the cost of government, as well as incidences of waste, fraud and abuse. But DOGE’s staff reductions have been sweeping and ill-thought-through, and have often had to be reversed. They also haven’t always saved the government money.

“[Private letter rulings] have significant user fees attached,” he noted. “So the one that requests it is actually funding the cost of those rulings, paying the IRS employees’ salaries, so it’s not costing other taxpayers.”

Shapiro expects a significant decrease in the number of rulings the IRS can issue — and that’s not the only problem.

“It’s significant because there’s another tax bill in the works,” Shapiro said. “They won’t have enough people at the IRS to give taxpayers and preparers guidance on how to apply laws that are not clear on their face. So without thinking about the effects on audit and compliance, I’m most worried about unclear rules and no clear interpretation of rules, because they won’t have the people they need to provide clear guidance.”

The number of audits will decrease because there won’t be enough people to do them, he indicated. “Also, we don’t know what will happen to audits in progress. My colleague had an Appeals conference, and the next day we found out that the Appeals officer was terminated, and his systems were locked down. Right now the case is in limbo — they don’t have enough personnel to pick up where they fired the Appeals officer in an untimely way. Anything like that, where the taxpayer is relying on human interaction, such as ID theft cases, can take over a year. We have no idea how long this one will take.”

The DOGE cuts will negatively affect litigation, according to Shapiro. 

“There will be fewer people at the IRS and fewer at Chief Counsel, so it will be more challenging for them to get things done because they will have a greater backlog,” he said. “They will likely have an increase in the number of automated notices and penalties. They will have to get the same amount of work done with fewer people, and not enough people to resolve problems.”

Perhaps more important is the impact all this will have on keeping things timely.

“My real concern is that anything where you need people at the IRS will take more time,” said Shapiro. “That goes for even the most mundane matters. For example, to establish a domestic entity you can just go online and get a tax ID, or do it by phone. A foreign entity can’t do that. So it’s harder for foreigners who want to do business in the U.S. Likewise for low-income taxpayers to resolve an issue through an offer in compromise. This will all go away without agents to help. There are things the IRS can do more efficiently, but they need to modernize their computer system. Right now there isn’t much interest in investing in technology, just in cutting people.”

“The people I have dealt with at the IRS have been good, intelligent, hardworking people trying to do the right thing,” he added. “They have saved taxpayers millions by giving clear guidance and making it possible for businesses to cooperate without having to spend huge amounts of money for guidance from the private sector. I love it when people pay me money to do that, but I don’t love it when taxpayers need to pay me money when the government could have given them clear guidance but didn’t have the resources to do it.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending