Connect with us

Personal Finance

Trump sued by 20 states to halt ‘dismantling’ of Education Department

Published

on

A security guard walks past the U.S. Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., March 12, 2025.

Nathan Howard | Reuters

A group of Democratic state attorneys general filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Thursday over its moves to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education and its termination of nearly half the agency’s staff.

Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia lodged the legal challenge in response to the Trump administration’s dismissal of more than 1,300 workers at the Education Dept.

“The lay-offs are an effective dismantling of the Department,” the state AGs wrote.

“[The] Department’s authority to administer [Reductions in Force] does not override Congress’s exclusive authority to abolish executive agencies or to discontinue their functions,” they added.

As an agency authorized by Congress, the Education Department cannot be eliminated without congressional approval. But in the meantime, the Trump administration can slowly starve it by cutting resources.

The plaintiffs named in the lawsuit are President Donald Trump, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon and the U.S. Department of Education.

The White House and Education Department did not immediately respond to a request from CNBC for comment.

More from Personal Finance:
Here’s the inflation breakdown for February 2025 — in one chart
‘Volatility is part of the game’: What financial advisors are telling clients
Women will get most of the $124 trillion ‘great wealth transfer’

On Tuesday, McMahon said on “Squawk Box” that efforts to dismantle the agency are “proceeding as expeditiously as possible.”

The Education Department manages the country’s more than $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio, provides funding for schools and ensures civil rights.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Personal Finance

As Social Security faces an uncertain future, some say it should be privatized

Published

on

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink speaks during the New York Times DealBook Summit Nov. 30, 2022 in New York City. 

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

President Donald Trump‘s efforts to slash federal government spending has ignited a new debate about the future of Social Security.

One idea that has been brought up before — privatizing the now public program — is getting new attention.

At the BlackRock retirement summit in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, CEO Larry Fink said he supports more individual ownership in Social Security, though he said he would not necessarily use the term privatizing because it has toxic connotations.

“The problem we have now, we have a plan called Social Security that doesn’t grow with the economy,” Fink said.

More from Personal Finance:
Trump says Education Dept. shouldn’t handle student loans
Potential cuts to Medicaid could include work requirements
Rules for repaying Social Security benefits are getting stricter

Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system — today’s payroll tax contributions generally fund benefits for current retirees and other beneficiaries.

Any leftover money that is not used to either pay benefits or fund the program’s administrative costs is put into the program’s trust funds. That money is invested in special Treasury bonds that earn a market rate of interest and which are guaranteed by the U.S. government, according to the Social Security Administration.

Privatizing the program could provide a way to invest money on behalf of individual workers that potentially earns a higher return, according to supporters of the idea.

“If we create a plan that every American can grow with our economy, they’re going to feel more attached to our economy,” Fink said.

‘Real battle’ brewing over Social Security’s future

House Ways and Means lawmakers on Wednesday voted to block a full House vote on a resolution of inquiry that Larson proposed to require disclosure of so-called Department of Government Efficiency activity at the Social Security Administration. At the hearing, Larson said he is concerned the Trump administration could try to privatize the program.

“We, I think, are in real battle here, and it’s really, in many respects, not unlike the battle that Roosevelt faced initially,” Larson told CNBC.com on Tuesday.

Privatizing Social Security has been considered before

The Social Security Act that created the program was signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935.

The idea of privatizing the program was proposed in 2005 by President George W. Bush.

Had those efforts been successful, Americans would have seen their retirement money increase four-fold, based on the returns of the S&P 500 index over that time, Fink said.

“I think more Americans would be a little more hopeful today with their retirement savings than just getting that bond payment,” Fink said.

Had Bush’s proposals gone through, Americans “probably would have been” better off today, said Andrew Biggs, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who served as associate director of Bush’s White House National Economic Council in 2005.

But the question now as to whether to invest Americans’ retirement money in government bonds or equities is misguided, Biggs said.

If someone has not saved money for retirement, the dilemma of where to invest is not relevant since they do not have the funds, he said. The same is true of the federal government, which currently does not have a significant surplus for the pay-as-you-go program.

Fiserv CEO on the nomination to Social Security Commisioner role

Moreover, if Social Security transitions to personalized accounts, there would also need to be extra money available to fund the transition costs to keep benefits going to current retirees, he said.

“It’s a question of saving more,” Biggs said.

Generally, Social Security reform discussions focus on making changes to improve the current system — raising taxes, cutting benefits or a combination of both.

Larson has a proposal to improve Social Security’s solvency by raising taxes on the wealthy while implementing benefit increases.

Yet it remains to be seen whether Republicans, who generally oppose tax increases, and Democrats, who do not want benefit cuts, can reach a bipartisan compromise.

Starting reform discussions based on the program’s current structure is limiting, Biggs said.

“We really do have a failure of imagination on Social Security reform,” Biggs said. “I think what Larry Fink is saying is, ‘Let’s think big on it.’ I think he’s absolutely correct on that point.”

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Here’s how the SALT deduction could change amid Trump’s tax cuts debate

Published

on

U.S. Representative Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) speaks during a press conference about the SALT Caucus outside the United States Capitol on Wednesday February 08, 2023 in Washington, DC. 

Matt McClain | The Washington Post | Getty Images

As lawmakers debate President Donald Trump‘s tax cuts, a key deduction could become a sticking point in 2025 tax negotiations, policy experts say.

Enacted via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, of 2017, there’s currently a $10,000 limit on the federal deduction on state and local taxes, known as SALT. Residents who itemize tax breaks cannot deduct more than $10,000 in levies paid to state and local governments, including income and property taxes.

That could change amid tax negotiations with lawmakers from high-tax states like California, New Jersey and New York.

Since 2018, the SALT cap has been a hot-button issue among certain lawmakers from those high-tax states. Before TCJA, the SALT deduction was unlimited, but the so-called alternative minimum tax reduced the benefit for some higher earners.

The TCJA SALT provision will expire after 2025 without action from Congress.

More from Personal Finance:
Here’s the inflation breakdown for February 2025 — in one chart
‘Volatility is part of the game’: What financial advisors are telling clients
Women will get most of the $124 trillion ‘great wealth transfer’

Although Trump enacted the $10,000 SALT cap in 2017, he reversed his position last year on the campaign trail, vowing to “get SALT back” if re-elected. He has renewed calls for reform since being sworn into office.

“I’d love to see something happen on SALT,” Trump said in a Fox News interview on Sunday. 

However, it’s unclear how the provision will ultimately change amid competing tax priorities and a limited budget

“The SALT cap is a major revenue raiser,” said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation. “That’s the balancing act.”

Trillions of dollars in tax breaks enacted via TCJA are scheduled to expire after 2025, including lower tax brackets, a bigger child tax credit and a 20% deduction for pass-through businesses, among others. 

Extending individual and estate tax provisions would reduce revenue by $3.9 trillion over the next decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

One SALT reform proposal, which aims to raise the SALT cap to $20,000 for married couples filing jointly, would further decrease revenue by $170 billion, the organization estimates.  

Other plans have called for a higher SALT deduction limit or raising the cap for taxpayers under a certain income threshold.

The budget is ‘too small’ for tax agenda

With control of both chambers of Congress, Republicans plan to use a process known as “reconciliation” to enact Trump’s tax agenda. Currently, the House Republicans’ budget blueprint authorizes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts through 2034, though it could change in Senate negotiations.

That’s an “almost unfathomably large number and somehow too small for the current agenda,” unless lawmakers include offsets to pay for the proposed tax cuts, said Andrew Lautz, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program.

“If there is a major tax deal this year, it seems almost certain that SALT will be part of the discussion,” he said.

Market turmoil and 401(k) plans: Why some investors are changing their retirement strategy

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

How to price your home to sell in 2025

Published

on

Lifestylevisuals | E+ | Getty Images

Selling a house involves much more than just putting up a “for sale” sign.

In addition to some key things to consider — like knowing market conditions, preparing your home for showings and deciding whether to work with a real estate agent — it’s important to get the right asking price, according to Joel Berner, a senior economist at Realtor.com. 

Otherwise, your home is going to sit on the market for a long time, and eventually you will have to cut the price anyway, he said. 

“Getting the price right to start is really important,” Berner said. 

More from Personal Finance:
Rules for repaying Social Security benefits are about to get stricter
Here’s how rent can make or break your credit
What potential FHA layoffs could mean for homebuyers

Zillow’s home trend expert Amanda Pendleton agreed, and said that homes that are well priced and marketed tend to sell in a matter of weeks comparted with homes that miss on the right asking pricing. Those can linger on the market for two months or more, she said. 

Here’s what to consider if you are looking to sell your home, according to experts. 

What’s happening in the housing market

Home sale listings have been picking up this year. This can create a more competitive environment for home sellers as buyers will have more options to choose from, Berner said.

For the week ending March 1, new listings increased 0.1% compared to the week prior, growing for the eighth consecutive week, Realtor.com found. In February, for-sale inventory was up 27.5% from a year prior, per the site’s monthly housing report

The disappearance of the starter home

Meanwhile, sellers have been forced to drop home prices while homes sit on the market for longer. The average time a listing spends on the market is up to 66 days, five more days than last February and the highest since February 2020.

In February, Realtor.com’s monthly report indicated that 16.8% of listings had price reductions, a 2.2 percentage point increase compared to last year, and the highest February activity since 2021.

A January report from the National Association of Realtors indicated a decrease in homes sold above asking price (15% vs. 16% the previous month and year). Meanwhile, homes listed got an average of 2.6 offers from buyers, up from 2.1 a month before but flat from 2.7 a year ago.

It’s not the same seller’s market from the past few years, said Jessica Lautz, deputy chief economist at the National Association of Realtors.

How to get the price right

To get an accurate sense of your property’s value and determine a reasonable listing price, Berner urges home sellers to research recent sales of comparable homes, and focus on properties similar in size, amenities and condition.

To ensure you don’t undersell your home, determine how much equity you need from the sale to cover the down payment, closing costs and moving expenses for your next home, Berner said.

“If you’re really afraid of underselling and have the option to not list your home, then maybe that’s going to be the right option,” Berner said.

For a general idea of your home’s value, online home price estimators, also known as automated valuation models, can be helpful. Such tools use algorithms and publicly available data to estimate a property’s worth, according to Bankrate.

But keep in mind that the estimate might be helpful only for a ball-park figure, experts caution. AVMs rely on public records, and if they haven’t been updated yet, the data might not reflect renovations or changes to the home, Bankrate noted.

A professional home appraiser or a real estate agent will be able to come into your home and look at any upgrades that you’ve made and provide a more detailed evaluation, Lautz said.

“Hire an experienced local agent who’s going to know your neighborhood like the back of their hand,” Pendleton said.

Continue Reading

Trending