Accounting
AI in advisory services: Forensic accounting
If artificial intelligence is eroding the base for the analytics-based transactional advisory work (see our feature story), what’s left? Where are the long-term, relationship-driven client-centric advisory services that call for holistic judgment take account of human psychology and emotion?
Fortunately for accountants, there are a lot to choose from, including the four we’re examining: forensic accounting, valuation services, M&A advisory and estate planning. These are just some of the areas that are seen as relatively safe from disruption by AI and automation — at least for now.
Forensic accounting, which often involves analyzing huge amounts of financial data and finding the story behind the numbers, might seem at first a natural fit for AI disruption. But look a little closer at what forensic accountants actually do, and it becomes clear that this is only part of story, because while data remains vital to their work, it’s useless without the human element, according to David Zweighaft, a partner with RSZ Forensic Associates, a New York City-based forensic accounting and litigation consulting firm.
“The ability to explain the nature of a fraud scheme and how it was detected and who was running it and why they did it is something that probably will not be comprehended by AI anytime soon. We’re tasked with answering questions and, at the end of the day, parties also like to know [the why behind the answer],” he said.
This is not to say that forensic accounting professionals do not use AI. Machine learning-driven models play a vital role in sorting through all the data and picking out possible red flags. Zweighaft said that forensic accountants have long used AI models, sometimes bespoke to the client, to contextualize a dataset so as to more easily spot anomalies and understand the financial damages they could represent. Still, he said it can be a “chicken and the egg” scenario, because those models still need to be validated one way or another.
(See our feature story, “
“You can use AI to build and run the model, and then you have to validate it yourself or you can sweat out the model and then validate it using AI,which I think is very cool. It gives you a lot of latitude in how you want to take advantage of it, and at the end of the day, it’s really up to the practitioner to determine what he or she feels is the most prudent way to approach it,” he said.
Still, once such models are prepared and validated, they can produce insights that even human professionals might miss. Zweighaft talked about an older case where someone was booking flights first on Delta and then would “dummy up” a second airline voucher for American Airlines. This was before AI analysis was in heavy use, so it was human investigators who eventually realized this person was putting the same ticket number on both documents, which eventually exposed him. Zweighaft said that feeding the flight data into an AI might produce the same sort of finding but faster.
“Given the same set of circumstances, you could probably feed this into AI and AI would be able to pick these out just with a great deal of precision: ‘This is not a Delta flight number. This flight never occurred.’ [It] could look at the airline flight guides and come up with all of this information far more quickly. So that’s a potential timesaver and that’s something that a human being might miss,” he said.
Like many practitioners, forensic accountants also use AI for data entry and processing, which before were time-consuming and frustrating, as well as “document interrogation” and analysis.
“Back in the old days, you used to get stacks and stacks of paper that you had to scan. Now you get reams of PDFs and you have to convert those into machine-readable format. So whether they’re bank or brokerage statements or other structured data sets, doing that used to be very time-consuming and tedious; now you can do multiple terabytes that can be done overnight. It really is amazing,” he said.
This plays into his larger view of AI as, at best, a “benign tool” that assists forensic accountants with research and data analytics in various parts of the workflow, versus something that could conceivably automate the entire engagement. This is because, while AI is great at handling the data-related aspects of a forensic engagement, it can’t yet handle tasks that rely more on human interaction — such as interrogation.
“[I’ll] ask ‘So that’s your signature on this document. Would you like to explain that?’ And the physical manifestation of the confession moment is when the person contracts, they hunch down, they take a deep breath. They exhale and they’ll say something like, ‘I was only doing it to keep the company afloat, the medical bills were crushing us and I needed the money, I intended to pay it back.’ You’re not going to get that from someone being interviewed or questioned by a HAL 9000,” he said.
(Read more: “
With this in mind, he is confident that what forensic accountants do won’t be replaced by AI, at least in the immediate future. There are just too many squishy human elements that don’t necessarily conform to a cold data analysis. He concedes that maybe one day in the future there could be AIs doing full financial forensics, but he is not sure whether this would be a good thing.
“What we do as forensic accountants is never going to be replaced. AI will augment, it will support what we do, [but] I don’t know that skepticism can be programmed. And that is going to always be a differentiator when we’re looking at when we’re doing in-person interviews. [For instance], they’ve done great work with detection of dishonesty using video. Is it perfect? I don’t know. Is it going to take the place of me doing admission-seeking interviews? I don’t know. It’s scary to think that you can take the human element out of investigations, but remains to be seen,” he said.
(See how AI is impacting firm services in
David Paul Morris/Bloomberg
Microsoft’s Recall AI tool — which captures and indexes screenshots of user activity every three seconds — is being reintroduced after facing significant privacy concerns when it was initially announced in 2024. Now available to
Why this is important for your firm and clients: Of course there’s data and privacy issues. Think about it: If you opt-in, then all of the activity on your device is being captured by Microsoft and then stored who-knows-where in the cloud. But on the upside, it will make recovering from a problem — a malware attack, a natural disaster — much faster, which could reduce losses. Like everything in tech, there’s a trade-off. Do you give up your privacy and your confidential information for increased productivity? There’s no right or wrong answer. Everything is judged by risk vs. reward. In case you’re wondering, I’ll opt-in.
President Donald Trump’s signature economic package took a major step toward becoming law when the House Ways and Means Committee approved trillions in new tax cuts for corporations, households and small businesses on a party-line vote.
The bill, once it clears procedural steps, will head to the House floor for passage. But crucial issues — including an unresolved battle over the
“The one big beautiful bill is the key to making America great again,” Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith said on Tuesday, kicking off the debate on the legislation.
The bill would permanently extend the lower individual tax rates enacted under Trump in 2017 including a lower 37% rate for the highest earners, after Republicans debated the possibility of raising levies on millionaires. The legislation also brings to life many of the
Those tax cuts begin this year and will last through 2028, coinciding with Trump’s time in the White House.
The plan also calls for a slew of cuts for companies, including expanding or renewing write-offs for business profits, loan expenses, equipment investments and research costs.
The biggest open question is how to address the SALT deduction. The bill calls for increasing the $10,000 cap on SALT to $30,000, with a phaseout for most filers making more than $400,000. Republicans representing high-tax areas have rejected that amount and have threatened to block the bill unless the write-off is made even bigger.
“There’s going to be bumps along the way in this process,” Smith told reporters Tuesday.
The vote in the House tax committee came after a marathon session in which Democrats assailed the bill, casting it as disproportionately benefiting the wealthy and large corporations while adding trillions to the national debt.
“This isn’t about growth or economic prosperity, it’s about protecting the ultra-wealthy,” Representative Richard Neal, the committee’s top Democrat, said. “It’s a tax cut for billionaires.”
The tax provisions are projected to add $3.8 trillion to deficits over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Spending cuts approved by other House committees do not come close to offsetting those reductions. Republicans argue that economic growth stemming from the tax cuts would ultimately erase those deficit increases, but economists are skeptical of that claim.
The bill also increases the child tax credit to $2,500 from $2,000 on a short-term basis, broadens health savings accounts and creates a new tax-preferred savings plan for children.
These breaks are partially paid for by ending many of the renewable energy tax benefits enacted under former President Joe Biden, including a credit for buying electric vehicles. University endowments, private foundations, sports team franchises and immigrants sending money to their home countries also face higher levies. Proposals to increase taxes on other businesses, including an increase in taxes on carried interest, were beaten back in a lobbying frenzy.
The House is aiming to vote next week. Republican lawmakers are hoping to move the package without the help of Democrats through the Senate and to Trump’s desk by July 4.
Senate leaders have said the real deadline is the federal borrowing limit. The Treasury Department has said they will run out of
— With assistance from Derek Wallbank, Emily Birnbaum and Billy House
QBO vs. QuickBooks Desktop, and other tech stories you may have missed
Trump tax plan gains momentum in House before floor vote
Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: NVDA, SMCI, AEO, UNH
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Economics1 week agoChina risks deeper deflation by diverting exports to domestic market
-
Personal Finance5 days agoHow consumers prepare for an economic hit
-
Personal Finance7 days agoI bonds investments and Trump’s tariff policy: What to know
-
Personal Finance5 days agoReal estate and gold vs. stocks: Best long-term investment
-
Economics6 days agoThe president has deleted a key tenet of American civil-rights law
-
Economics6 days agoAndrew Bailey on why UK-U.S. trade deal won’t end uncertainty
-
Economics6 days ago
Trump knocks down a controversial pillar of civil-rights law
-
Finance4 days agoAmerica failing its young investors, warns financial guru Ric Edelman