Connect with us

Finance

45% of Generation X is not confident about their retirement

Published

on

As Generation X continues getting closer to retirement, some have less than rosy views about their retirement prospects, according to a recently-released study from Fidelity Investments. 

Fidelity Investments found in the latest edition of its annual “State of Retirement Planning” study that 45% of Gen Xers – those between the ages of 44 and 59 – reported feeling they were “not confident” in their ability to retire “when and how they want.”

Meanwhile, 53% felt confident they could do so. 

Savings jar

A person puts money into a retirement savings jar. (iStock / iStock)

“Gen X is most likely to be what we call the sandwich generation right now,” Fidelity Investments Vice President of Retirement Offerings Rita Assaf told FOX Business. “They are caring for both children and aging parents, as well as preparing for retirement. That’s pretty costly.”

“They’re also at a time where higher cost of living, so if they’re helping with children, they most likely have kids in college or maybe they just finished college, and those costs have been much higher,” she continued. “Their day-to-day expenses are much higher. And we also know with aging parents, the healthcare and long-term care costs associated with that as well.” 

Assaf said Gen X being poised to be the first “401(K) generation” has also driven those figures.

“Current retirees are primarily using still pensions as their primary way to fund their retirement savings, but Gen X, I think our study found 61% will be leveraging 401(K)s and IRAs and individual savings vehicles for retirement, so that’s a big difference as well,” she noted.

401(K) BALANCES HIT SECOND HIGHEST ON RECORD: FIDELITY

Compared to last year’s study, Gen X confidence in retiring “when and how they want” dropped 16 percentage points, something that Assaf linked to higher cost of living and members of the generation moving nearer to retirement age.

She said the survey “really highlighted the fact that with higher cost of living, there’s a bit of general concern that ‘will my retirement savings last’?” 

Gen X “notably hold the most negative retirement outlook” among the four generations included in the study, according to Fidelity Investments.

The study found Gen Z and Millennials felt the most confident about retiring “on their own terms,” at 75% and 71%, respectively. Meanwhile, 68% of Baby Boomers reported they were confident. 

For Gen X, juggling children, aging parents and higher costs of living have played into that. Assaf also said that “anxiety tends to raise as you get close” to retirement.

Younger generations like Gen Z and Millennials “still have a long time-horizon so they’re actually feeling more confident” and “have more time on their hands to save more and invest and reap the benefits of compound earnings,” according to Assaf. 

Overall, 67% of those in their retirement planning years felt positively when it came to retiring “when and how they want,” Fidelity Investments said. 

THIS MIDWESTERN STATE IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE BEST PLACES TO RETIRE, NEW STUDY SAYS: SEE THE LIST

The study was based on a survey that involved over 2,000 “adult financial decision makers” with a minimum of one investment account. 

Socking away sufficient money, inflation and high costs of living, striking the balance of covering expenses now versus saving for retirement and figuring out the amount of funds needed for retirement were among the issues respondents identified as those posing the most challenge, according to the study.

Retiree calculating expenses

Closeup of a senior man’s hand calculating bills at home (iStock / iStock)

Meanwhile, among current retirees, the Golden Years were “going as planned” for 72%, the study reported. A similar share – 70% – also felt their retirement planning set them up sufficiently.

STUDY SHOWS HOW LONG SOCIAL SECURITY, $1.5M NEST EGG WOULD LAST IN 50 STATES

When it came to retirement income, 77% of retirees pointed to Social Security as their top source, according to the study. Behind that was pensions, at 48%, and personal savings, at 41%.

401k pension retirement

A retired couple walks arm in arm on the beach.  (Annette Riedl/picture alliance via Getty Images / Getty Images)

“Planning does not stop at retirement,” Assaf told FOX Business. “You have to keep evolving your planning, even when you’re in retirement.” 

The savings of seven in 10 retirees have taken a hit from the rising cost of living, the survey said. 

The Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies found in an August 2024 report that the median age of retirement for middle-class retirees was 62.

Americans think $1.46 million is the amount of money necessary to experience a comfortable retirement, according to a study released by Northwestern Mutual last year. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Finance

Tariffs may raise much less than White House projects, economists say

Published

on

President Donald Trump speaks before signing executive orders in the Oval Office on March 6, 2025.

Alex Wong | Getty Images

President Donald Trump says that tariffs will make the U.S. “rich.” But those riches will likely be far less than the White House expects, economists said.

The ultimate sum could have big ramifications for the U.S. economy, the nation’s debt and legislative negotiations over a tax-cut package, economists said.

White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Sunday estimated tariffs would raise about $600 billion a year and $6 trillion over a decade. Auto tariffs would add another $100 billion a year, he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Navarro made the projection as the U.S. plans to announce more tariffs against U.S. trading partners on Wednesday.

Economists expect the Trump administration’s tariff policy would generate a much lower amount of revenue than Navarro claims. Some project the total revenue would be less than half.

Roughly $600 billion to $700 billion a year “is not even in the realm of possibility,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s. “If you get to $100 billion to $200 billion, you’ll be pretty lucky.”

The White House declined to respond to a request for comment from CNBC about tariff revenue.

The ‘mental math’ behind tariff revenue

There are big question marks over the scope of the tariffs, including details like amount, duration, and products and countries affected — all of which have a significant bearing on the revenue total.

The White House is considering a 20% tariff on most imports, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday. President Trump floated this idea on the campaign trail. The Trump administration may ultimately opt for a different policy, like country-by-country tariffs based on each nation’s respective trade and non-trade barriers.

But a 20% tariff rate seems to align with Navarro’s revenue projections, economists said.

The U.S. imported about $3.3 trillion of goods in 2024. Applying a 20% tariff rate to all these imports would yield about $660 billion of annual revenue.

“That is almost certainly the mental math Peter Navarro is doing — and that mental math skips some crucial steps,” said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and former chief economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers during the Biden administration.

Trade advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump Peter Navarro speaks to press outside of the White House on March 12, 2025 in Washington, DC. 

Kayla Bartkowski | Getty Images

That’s because an accurate revenue estimate must account for the many economic impacts of tariffs in the U.S. and around the world, economists said. Those effects combine to reduce revenue, they said.

A 20% broad tariff would raise about $250 billion a year (or $2.5 trillion over a decade) when taking those effects into account, according to Tedeschi, citing a Yale Budget Lab analysis published Monday.  

There are ways to raise larger sums — but they would involve higher tariff rates, economists said. For example, a 50% across-the-board tariff would raise about $780 billion per year, according to economists at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Even that is an optimistic assessment: It doesn’t account for lower U.S. economic growth due to retaliation or the negative growth effects from the tariffs themselves, they wrote.

Why revenue would be lower than expected

Tariffs generally raise prices for consumers. A 20% broad tariff would cost the average consumer $3,400 to $4,200 a year, according to the Yale Budget Lab.

Consumers would naturally buy fewer imported goods if they cost more, economists said. Lower demand means fewer imports and less tariff revenue from those imports, they said.

Tariffs are also expected to trigger “reduced economic activity,” said Robert McClelland, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

More from Personal Finance:
Economists say ‘value-added taxes’ aren’t a trade barrier
Tariffs are ‘lose-lose’ for U.S. jobs and industry
Why uncertainty makes the stock market go haywire

For example, U.S. companies that don’t pass tariff costs on to consumers via higher prices would likely see profits suffer (and their income taxes fall), economists said. Consumers might pull back on spending, further denting company profits and tax revenues, economists said. Companies that take a financial hit might lay off workers, they said.

Foreign nations are also expected to retaliate with their own tariffs on U.S. products, which would hurt companies that export products abroad. Other nations may experience an economic downturn, further reducing demand for U.S. products.

Tariffs could be a major rewiring of the domestic and global economy, says Mohamed El-Erian

“If you get a 20% tariff rate, you’re going to get a rip-roaring recession, and that will undermine your fiscal situation,” Zandi said.

There’s also likely to be a certain level of non-compliance with tariff policy, and carve-outs for certain countries, industries or products, economists said. For instance, when the White House levied tariffs on China in February, it indefinitely exempted “de minimis” imports valued at $800 or less.

The Trump administration might also funnel some tariff revenue to paying certain parties aggrieved by a trade war, economists said.

President Trump did that in his first term: The government sent $61 billion in “relief” payments to American farmers who faced retaliatory tariffs, which was nearly all (92%) of the tariff revenue on Chinese goods from 2018 to 2020, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

The tariffs will also likely have a short life span, diluting their potential revenue impact, economists said. They’re being issued by executive order and could be undone easily, whether by President Trump or a future president, they said.

“There’s zero probability these tariffs will last for 10 years,” Zandi said. “If they last until next year I’d be very surprised.”

Why this matters

The Trump administration has signaled that tariffs “will be one of the top-tier ways they’ll try to offset the cost” of passing a package of tax cuts, Tedeschi said.

Extending a 2017 tax cut law signed by President Trump would cost $4.5 trillion over a decade, according to the Tax Foundation. Trump has also called for other tax breaks like no taxes on tips, overtime pay or Social Security benefits, and a tax deduction for auto loan interest for American made cars.

If tariffs don’t cover the full cost of such a package, then Republican lawmakers would have to find cuts elsewhere or increase the nation’s debt, economists said.

Continue Reading

Finance

Investors hope April 2 could bring some tariff clarity and relief. That may not happen

Published

on

Continue Reading

Finance

Cliff Asness’s AQR multi-strategy hedge fund returns 9% in the first quarter during tough conditions

Published

on

Cliff Asness.

Chris Goodney | Bloomberg | Getty Images

AQR Capital Management’s multistrategy hedge fund beat the market with a 9% rally in the first quarter as Wall Street grappled with extreme volatility amid President Donald Trump’s uncertain tariff policy.

The Apex strategy from Cliff Asness’ firm, which combines stocks, macro and arbitrage trades and has $3 billion in assets under management, gained 3.4% in March, boosting its first-quarter performance, according to a person familiar with AQR’s returns who asked to be anonymous as the information is private.

AQR’s Delphi Long-Short Equity Strategy gained 9.7% in the first quarter, while its alternative trend-following offering Helix returned 3%, the person said.

AQR, whose assets under management reached $128 billion at the end of March, declined to comment.

The stock market just wrapped up a tumultuous quarter as Trump’s aggressive tariffs raised concerns about an severe economic slowdown and a re-acceleration of inflation. The S&P 500 dipped into correction territory in March after hitting a record in February.

For the quarter, the equity benchmark was down 4.6%, snapping a five-quarter win streak. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite lost 10.4% in the quarter, which would mark its biggest quarterly pullback since a 22.4% plunge in the second quarter of 2022.

Continue Reading

Trending