Connect with us

Technology

Biden’s Student Loan Repayment Plan Is Being Challenged. Here’s What to Know.

Published

1 year ago

on

When President Biden announced his plan to provide student debt relief for 43 million borrowers nearly two years ago, there was a piece to his program that attracted less attention: a new student loan repayment program that would cut monthly payments in half for millions.

The repayment program, called SAVE, was meant to become a permanent fixture of the federal student loan system, offering a more affordable path to repayment, particularly for lower-income borrowers. But two groups of Republican-led states have filed separate lawsuits to block the SAVE program — including many of the states that challenged Mr. Biden’s $400 billion debt cancellation plan, which was struck down by the Supreme Court last year.

Missouri, along with six other states, filed suit on Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, seeking to upend the program. That follows a challenge filed by 11 other states, led by Kansas, in late March. Both suits argue that the administration has again exceeded its authority, and the repayment plan is just another backhanded attempt to wipe debts clean.

“Yet again, the president is unilaterally trying to impose an extraordinarily expensive and controversial policy that he could not get through Congress,” the plaintiffs said in the complaint filed in Missouri.

The latest legal challenge landed just a day after the Biden administration renewed its efforts to offer more extensive debt relief in an attempt to make good on a campaign promise during an election year. That effort, which joins existing programs offering targeted relief, is also expected to be challenged.

The SAVE plan, which opened to borrowers in August and has more than eight million enrollees, isn’t a novel idea: It’s an income-driven repayment program based on a roughly 30-year-old design that ties borrowers’ monthly payments to their income and household size. But SAVE has more generous terms than previous plans. Already, 360,000 enrollees have received approval to have the remainder of their debts canceled, totaling $4.8 billion, after having made payments for 10 to 19 years.

Blocking the plan could throw millions of borrowers’ financial lives into disarray and create headaches for loan servicers. Several legal experts said they felt that the program was on firmer legal ground than the plan blocked by the Supreme Court. That program was based on emergency powers derived through the HEROES Act, which President Donald J. Trump invoked to pause student loan payments at the start of the pandemic in 2020.

The Education Department declined to comment on pending litigation. But it said Congress gave the department the authority to define the terms of income-driven repayment plans, which adjust payments to a borrower’s income, in 1993, and that the SAVE plan was the fourth time it had used that authority.

Still, law professors and consumer advocates concede that the legal landscape has shifted, leaving more questions about the plan’s fate.

Here’s what we know:

Anything related to student loan relief has become politically charged. Here, the states argue the SAVE plan is unlawful in large part because of its high projected costs, which they said should require approval by Congress.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that SAVE would cost $261 billion over 10 years, but another analysis came up with a much larger number.

Economists for the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a research group at the University of Pennsylvania, projected it would cost $475 billion over the same period — with roughly $235 billion of that attributed to the increased generosity of SAVE relative to existing plans, according to Kent Smetters, a professor at Wharton and the faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model.

The legal challenges “are all basically premised on the idea that if it’s expensive, it’s illegal,” said Persis Yu, deputy executive director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group. “That’s not really the law.”

SAVE’s terms are more favorable: It reduces payments on undergraduate loans to 5 percent of a borrower’s discretionary income, down from 10 percent in the plan it replaced, known as REPAYE. After monthly payments for a set number of years — usually 20 — any balance is forgiven. (Graduate school debtors still pay 10 percent over 25 years.)

The program shortens the repayment term for people who initially borrowed $12,000 or less to 10 years, at which point any remaining debt is canceled.

SAVE also tweaks the payment formula so more income is protected for a borrower’s basic needs, reducing payments overall. That means borrowers who earn less than 225 percent of the federal poverty guideline — equivalent to what a $15-an-hour worker earns annually, or $32,800 or less for a single person — have no monthly payment. Under REPAYE, less income was shielded, up to 150 percent of federal poverty guidelines.

About 4.5 million of the roughly eight million SAVE enrollees have no monthly payment, according to the White House.

The states seeking to block the program argue that this effectively makes more of the loans act like grants.

Before a court can get to the arguments of a case, the plaintiffs must establish that they have standing to sue — that is, they are suffering a concrete harm that can be remedied by the courts.

Some legal experts said that Missouri may have a better chance at passing this test — after all, it succeeded when the states challenged Mr. Biden’s broad debt relief program. Though a district court in that case initially found that the states did not have standing to sue, the decision was reversed by an appeals court and the plan was put on hold. Later, the Supreme Court held that Missouri had standing because it would have lost revenue from the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, or MOHELA (a federal loan servicer, which is considered an arm of that state), if the debt cancellation proceeded. That was enough to let the case move forward, and Missouri is making a somewhat similar argument here.

“That is a proven path to standing when the government promises to wipe away the debts of tens of millions of people — but it’s not clear that it will be successful here, since lower monthly payments are not the same as total debt relief,” said Mike Pierce, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center.

Besides arguing that Missouri would lose money unless borrowers stayed in debt longer, the suit also contends the plan would hurt the states’ ability to attract employees to government jobs because the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Plan — which allows public sector and nonprofit workers to have federal student debt balances forgiven, generally after 10 years of payments — will become less attractive when stacked alongside SAVE. (The suit doesn’t mention that SAVE is a qualifying repayment program that can be used as part of the Public Service Forgiveness Program, which often offers an even shorter path to forgiveness than SAVE.)

The states also claim in the lawsuit that forgiveness will deprive them of tax revenue — a federal law effective through 2025 exempts canceled student debt from taxation, and several states’ laws track federal taxation laws. But legal experts and advocates say the states could change their tax laws and collect the extra revenue.

If either of the recent cases moves forward, the states will get their chance to argue that the Education Department overstepped its authority — most likely, by turning to a legal principle known as the “major questions doctrine,” which has been increasingly invoked by conservative challengers seeking to curb the powers of the executive branch. The thrust of that doctrine is that Congress must speak clearly when it authorizes the executive branch and its agencies to take on matters of political or economic significance. In the past, courts would typically defer to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes.

“The major questions doctrine has put a major crimp on the executive branch’s ability to innovate on longstanding programs and longstanding statutes,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Five years ago, the question we would have asked is if the interpretation was reasonable. Now, the question is, ‘Is their authority clear?’ And that is a difficult — if not impossible — standard for agencies to meet, especially for statutes Congress enacted years, if not decades, before the major questions doctrine was a thing.”

“It’s going to be hard for anyone to be confident,” he added, “that the new plan is safe just because the legal arguments in support of it are strong.”

In 1993, Congress amended the Higher Education Act of 1965 and enabled Education Department to modify its income-contingent repayment plan, which was created to provide financial relief to borrowers at risk of falling behind on payments. Since then, the department has relied on that authority to create two other income-driven programs, including Pay As You Earn (PAYE) in 2012 and the Revised Pay As You Earn (REPAYE) in 2015, both of which incrementally improved on the plans before them.

“This statutory authority is not just a theoretical argument,” explained Mark Kantrowitz, a financial aid expert, who also said he considered the legal challenges too weak to succeed.

The group of states led by Kansas have filed for a preliminary injunction, with the hope that the courts will temporarily block the entire SAVE program while the case is decided. But that probably won’t happen, at least not in a way that would upset the stability of the student loan repayment system. The states would have to show their case is likely to succeed, and the courts would have to weigh the harm to borrowers against the harm claimed by the states.

“While they seem to be asking the court to block implementation of all aspects of the SAVE plan, their biggest focus is on blocking the Department of Education from canceling debt under the plan, arguing that’s what will irreparably harm states while the litigation is pending because, as they put it, once the debt is canceled, that egg can’t be unscrambled,” said Abby Shafroth, co-director of advocacy at the National Consumer Law Center.

Borrower advocates suggest focusing on what you can control — continue to enroll in the repayment plan that makes most sense for your financial situation.

But keep in mind that the Biden administration plans to phase out some income-driven repayment plans on July 1, when all of SAVE’s benefits take full effect. New borrowers won’t be able to enroll in the PAYE plan or the income-contingent plan (I.C.R.) after July 1, though borrowers with parent PLUS loans will remain eligible — after they are consolidated. The REPAYE plan has already been replaced by SAVE.

The so-called income-based repayment plan, known as I.B.R., will remain open, though its terms are generally not as favorable as the SAVE program.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Technology

​Will iPhone Prices Rise Due to Trump’s China Tariffs?

Published

1 month ago

on

April 12, 2025

By

Analysts projected that iPhones could see price hikes

​The recent imposition of steep tariffs on Chinese imports by the Trump administration has raised concerns about potential price increases for consumer electronics, particularly Apple’s iPhones. With a 145% tariff on Chinese goods, many feared that the cost of iPhones, which are predominantly assembled in China, would surge. Analysts projected that the iPhone 16 Pro Max could see its price jump from $1,199 to as much as $1,999 if these costs were passed directly to consumers.​

However, in a recent development, the administration announced exemptions for smartphones, laptops, and other electronics from these tariffs. This decision aims to prevent significant price hikes for consumers and mitigate potential losses for major tech companies like Apple.

Despite this temporary relief, Apple continues to diversify its supply chain to reduce reliance on China. The company has expanded manufacturing operations in India and Vietnam, with India now exporting components to Vietnam and China for final assembly. This strategic move not only mitigates tariff risks but also addresses geopolitical uncertainties affecting global trade.​

Relocating significant portions of Apple’s supply chain is a complex and costly endeavor. Estimates suggest that moving just 10% of production from China to the U.S. could take up to three years and cost approximately $30 billion. Moreover, replicating China’s established manufacturing ecosystem elsewhere presents logistical challenges.​

For consumers, the exemption of smartphones from the recent tariffs means that, for now, iPhone prices are unlikely to see drastic increases. However, the situation remains fluid, and future policy changes could impact pricing. Consumers may consider purchasing devices sooner rather than later or exploring alternative brands and models to mitigate potential cost increases.​

In summary, while the immediate threat of iPhone price hikes due to tariffs has been averted, ongoing trade tensions and supply chain adjustments continue to influence the tech industry’s landscape. Staying informed about these developments is crucial for consumers and stakeholders alike.

Continue Reading

Technology

Quantum Computing is Transforming Industries, Security, and Future Technologies

Published

2 months ago

on

March 29, 2025

By

Quantum Computing is Transforming Industries, Security, and Future Technologies

Quantum computing is rapidly emerging as one of the most transformative technologies of the 21st century. Unlike classical computers, which use bits to process information as either 0s or 1s, quantum computers leverage qubits, allowing them to exist in multiple states simultaneously. This property, known as superposition, along with entanglement and quantum tunneling, enables quantum computers to solve complex problems exponentially faster than traditional systems. As this technology advances, industries across the board are exploring its potential to revolutionize computing, security, and data processing.

Real-World Applications of Quantum Computing in Industries

Several industries are already benefiting from quantum computing’s capabilities. In healthcare, quantum algorithms are accelerating drug discovery by simulating molecular structures at an unprecedented scale, significantly reducing the time required for pharmaceutical research. Financial institutions are leveraging quantum computing to optimize trading strategies, portfolio management, and risk assessment. In manufacturing, quantum simulations enhance material science, leading to the development of stronger and more efficient materials. The logistics sector is also utilizing quantum computing to optimize supply chain management, reducing operational costs and improving efficiency.

Key Developments from Tech Giants in Quantum Research

Leading technology companies such as Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Intel are at the forefront of quantum computing research. Google made headlines with its claim of achieving quantum supremacy in 2019 when its quantum processor completed a calculation in 200 seconds that would take a classical supercomputer thousands of years. IBM continues to advance its quantum computing roadmap with cloud-accessible quantum computers and the development of a 1,000-qubit processor. Microsoft is investing heavily in topological qubits, a novel approach aimed at creating more stable quantum processors. Meanwhile, Intel is working on silicon-based quantum chips, striving to make quantum computing more scalable and accessible.

Quantum Cryptography and Its Potential to Redefine Security

As quantum computers advance, they pose a significant threat to current encryption methods. Traditional cryptographic techniques, such as RSA and ECC encryption, rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers, a challenge that quantum computers can overcome almost instantly. Quantum cryptography, particularly quantum key distribution (QKD), offers a solution by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics to create theoretically unbreakable encryption. Governments and cybersecurity firms are actively researching post-quantum cryptographic solutions to safeguard sensitive data against potential quantum attacks.

Challenges in Scaling Quantum Technologies

Despite its immense potential, quantum computing faces several challenges before it can become widely adopted. One of the biggest hurdles is qubit stability, as qubits are highly sensitive to environmental disturbances, leading to errors in computations. Error correction mechanisms are still in their early stages, requiring significant advancements before quantum computers can handle large-scale, practical applications. Additionally, quantum hardware is expensive and requires extreme cooling conditions, making commercialization difficult. Researchers and tech companies are actively working on solutions to address these challenges, but widespread implementation remains years, if not decades, away.

Conclusion

Quantum computing is poised to revolutionize industries by solving complex problems beyond the reach of classical computers. From pharmaceutical research and financial modeling to secure communications and logistics optimization, its applications are vast and transformative. However, challenges related to scalability, stability, and cost must be addressed before quantum computers can become mainstream. With continued advancements from tech giants and research institutions, the future of quantum computing holds immense promise, paving the way for groundbreaking innovations in computing and security.

Continue Reading

Technology

Global Adoption Trends and Hurdles in Implementing 5G

Published

2 months ago

on

March 16, 2025

By

The global rollout of 5G technology is revolutionizing connectivity

The global rollout of 5G technology is revolutionizing connectivity, offering ultra-fast speeds, lower latency, and increased network capacity. This next-generation wireless technology is laying the foundation for smart cities, autonomous vehicles, and IoT-driven industries, creating a more interconnected world. However, despite its rapid expansion, several challenges hinder its full-scale implementation.

Current Trends in 5G Adoption

Rapid Expansion in Developed Nations

Countries such as the United States, South Korea, China, and Japan are leading the way in 5G deployment. Major telecom providers like Verizon, AT&T, Huawei, and Ericsson are heavily investing in infrastructure, ensuring rapid expansion in urban areas. These nations are experiencing high demand for 5G connectivity, which is driving innovation in mobile networks, smart devices, and industrial applications. While developing nations like India, Brazil, and regions in Africa are gradually adopting 5G networks, the rollout is slower due to infrastructure limitations and high deployment costs. Governments and telecom providers in these countries are forming strategic partnerships to speed up 5G adoption, ensuring digital transformation reaches both urban and rural communities.

Enterprise Adoption Across Industries

Businesses across various industries are harnessing the power of 5G technology to enhance operations. Healthcare, manufacturing, and autonomous transportation are seeing significant advancements due to high-speed, low-latency networks. The healthcare sector is benefiting from 5G-enabled remote surgeries, while manufacturers are implementing smart factories with real-time automation. Autonomous vehicles, AI-driven logistics, and connected industrial IoT devices are all thriving on 5G connectivity.

5G-Powered Smart Cities and IoT

The rise of smart cities is closely linked to 5G technology, as real-time traffic management, smart grids, and enhanced public safety systems become more efficient. Additionally, the Internet of Things (IoT) is heavily reliant on 5G networks, enabling seamless connectivity for smart home devices, industrial sensors, and automated infrastructure.

Challenges Hindering 5G Implementation

High Infrastructure Costs

One of the most significant barriers to 5G implementation is the high cost of infrastructure. Deploying fiber-optic cables, small cell towers, and advanced base stations requires massive investment, making it challenging for rural and underdeveloped regions to fully embrace 5G networks.

Regulatory and Spectrum Allocation Issues

Governments worldwide are struggling with spectrum allocation and regulation, causing delays in 5G deployment. Licensing fees, spectrum availability, and geopolitical tensions between major tech powers have further complicated the adoption process. Countries that lack a clear 5G regulatory framework face difficulties in rolling out networks efficiently.

Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks

With an increased number of 5G-enabled devices, the risk of cybersecurity threats and hacking has also grown. Data privacy concerns, network vulnerabilities, and potential cyberattacks are some of the biggest challenges facing 5G adoption. Telecom providers and cybersecurity firms are working to implement stronger security measures to protect users and businesses.

Device Compatibility and Consumer Adoption

Although 5G-enabled smartphones, tablets, and IoT devices are becoming more available, many consumers still use 4G LTE technology, delaying mass adoption. Additionally, the cost of upgrading to 5G-compatible hardware remains a concern, especially in price-sensitive markets. Until devices become more affordable, consumer adoption will continue to be slower than expected.

Environmental and Health Concerns

The rapid expansion of 5G networks has raised questions about radiation exposure and potential health risks. While scientific research is ongoing, concerns remain about the long-term effects of increased electromagnetic frequency (EMF) exposure. Additionally, 5G infrastructure requires significant energy consumption, raising environmental concerns regarding sustainability.

The Future of 5G Technology

Despite the challenges, the future of 5G connectivity remains promising. As governments, telecom providers, and enterprises collaborate to address infrastructure costs, security concerns, and regulatory hurdles, the world moves closer to widespread 5G adoption. Continued investment in 5G infrastructure, cybersecurity advancements, and cost-efficient devices will accelerate the transition to a more connected and technologically advanced society.

The journey toward full-scale 5G implementation is not without obstacles, but the benefits far outweigh the challenges. Over the coming years, 5G networks will continue to reshape industries, improve global connectivity, and pave the way for a smarter, faster, and more efficient digital world.

Continue Reading

Trending