The price of used electric vehicles has come down to levels comparable with gasoline cars, a dynamic poised to boost their popularity despite the loss of a federal tax incentive for EVs, according to auto analysts.
In August, the price premium for used EVs relative to used vehicles with a gasoline engine narrowed to just $897, on average, the smallest price gap on record, according to Cox Automotive.
The average list price for used EVs was $34,704 in August, down 1.1% from July and 2.6% from a year earlier, it found.
This price tag excludes a federal tax credit that ended after Sept. 30, after Republicans scrapped it as part of a multitrillion-dollar legislative package in July. That tax break was worth up to $4,000 for used EVs (and $7,500 for new EVs) — meaning the average used EV cost less than its gasoline counterpart after incentives.
Consumers bought nearly 41,000 used EVs in August, up 59% from a year earlier, Cox data shows.
Analysts expect that momentum to continue, driven in large part by affordability even absent the federal tax break.
2026 will be “the year of the used EV,” said Scott Case, the CEO of Recurrent, an EV market research firm.
Why leased EVs help drive down prices for used ones
Automakers leaned heavily on leasing in recent years to move electric vehicles, analysts said.
Since 2023, more than 1.1 million EVs have been leased, Stephanie Valdez Streaty, director of industry insights at Cox, wrote in an analysis last month.
This was partly due to the so-called leasing “loophole.” Consumers could more easily claim a $7,500 tax credit when leasing a new EV than buying one, the latter of which came with more restrictions.
Now, a large volume of electric vehiclesare reaching the end of their lease term. Lease returns and trade-ins are boosting the supply of used EVs, driving down prices, Valdez Streaty wrote.
In fact, 14 used EV models had a lower average price than their gasoline counterparts in August, according to Valdez Streaty.
“For mainstream buyers, EV affordability in the used-vehicle space is finally within reach,” Valdez Streaty wrote.
The top-selling models — Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model Y, the General Motors-owned Chevrolet Bolt EV, Tesla Model S and Ford Mustang Mach-E — all had prices below the market average in August, which shows their appeal to budget-conscious buyers consumers, Valdez Streaty wrote.
For example, two high-volume models — the Renault-owned Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Model 3 — carried an average price tag of $12,890 and $23,278, respectively, according to Valdez Streaty. The Chevrolet Bolt EV was $14,705.
Not the ‘end of affordable EVs’
Valentinrussanov | E+ | Getty Images
By contrast, the market for new electric vehicles is likely to struggle for the rest of 2025 and into next year, analysts said.
Average new EV prices in August were $57,245, representing a nearly $9,100 premium over the average gasoline car, according to Cox Automotive.
That doesn’t include the now-expired $7,500 federal tax credit, which brought new EVs closer to price parity with their gasoline counterparts.
“The tax credit helped get a lot of butts in seats,” Aaron Bragman, Detroit bureau chief for Cars.com, told CNBC. “It helped a lot of people get into EVs.”
However, there are still some relatively affordable new electric vehicles even without the federal tax break, he said.
For example, the 2025 Nissan Leaf has a starting price under $30,000, Bragman said.
A few others — the Fiat 500e, Hyundai Kona Electric and Chevrolet Equinox EV — have a starting price under $35,000, according to Cars.com.
“The end of the [tax] credit doesn’t mean the end of affordable EVs,” Bragman wrote in an e-mail. “Brands like Nissan, Chevrolet, and Hyundai are rolling out lower-priced options, and used EVs are getting more attractive too, with plenty available under $25,000. Battery costs are also coming down, which will help keep prices competitive in the long run.”
For mainstream buyers, EV affordability in the used-vehicle space is finally within reach.
Stephanie Valdez Streaty
director of industry insights at Cox Automotive
In fact, the tax break’s expiration doesn’t seem to negatively influence interest among prospective new-car buyers, according to J.D. Power.
More than half of new-vehicle shoppers are either “very likely” (24%) or “somewhat likely” (35%) to consider buying an EV in the next 12 months, rates that have remained fairly consistent for the past year, according to a September study by J.D. Power.
Total cost of ownership
Consumers should focus on total cost of ownership rather than upfront purchase price when choosing a car, analysts said.
This means a car owner should account not only for upfront purchase price, but for the full suite of financial costs, like repairs, maintenance and fuel.
“I think this is the bigger argument” in favor of EVs, said Case of Recurrent.
Factors like geography and charging accessibility are important here, analysts said. For example, relying heavily on public charging networks may flip the economic calculus, since public charging is often more expensive than charging at home, they said.
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island are among the states that offer relatively generous incentives, analysts said.
“There are a lot of state supports still for these EVs,” said Al Salas, CEO of Eco Auto, an EV dealer with operations in Massachusetts and Washington state.
The 2026 residential real estate market presents a nuanced landscape for homebuyers, current homeowners, and property investors. With benchmark mortgage rates adjusting alongside Treasury yield movements, real estate strategies require careful evaluation of borrowing costs, local market supply dynamics, and long-term home equity management.
Adapting Homebuying Strategies to Mortgage Dynamics
Prospective homebuyers are adapting to fixed 30-year mortgage rates hovering between 6.0% and 6.8%. While borrowing costs are elevated compared to historical lows seen in prior decades, moderating home price growth across several regional markets is creating selective opportunities for buyers with strong credit profiles.
Homebuyers are increasingly utilizing strategic mortgage options:
– Builder Rate Buydowns: Purchasing new construction homes where developers offer temporary or permanent interest rate buydowns to lower initial monthly payments.
– Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (ARMs): Selecting 5/1 or 7/1 hybrid ARMs with strict rate caps for short-to-medium-term housing plans.
– Points and Financing Structure: Evaluating upfront discount point purchases to secure lower fixed interest rates over the loan term.
Home Equity Utilization and Renovation Financing
For existing homeowners holding low-rate legacy mortgages, moving to a new property often entails relinquishing favorable debt terms. Consequently, many homeowners are choosing to renovate and expand existing properties rather than sell.
Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs) and home equity loans allow homeowners to access accumulated property equity for capital improvements without disturbing their primary mortgage rate. Utilizing home equity for value-adding property renovations can enhance living space while increasing long-term property values.
Strategic Real Estate Investment Guidelines
For residential property investors, achieving positive cash flow requires strict underwriting standards:
– Stress-Test Operating Expenses: Factor in rising property insurance premiums, local property taxes, and ongoing maintenance reserves.
– Focus on High-Growth Rental Markets: Target regions experiencing steady job growth and sustained tenant demand.
– Maintain Cash Buffers: Ensure property portfolios maintain dedicated emergency reserves to navigate unexpected vacancy periods or major repairs.
Actionable Homeownership Steps
1. Evaluate Complete Monthly Housing Costs: Assess property taxes, homeowners insurance, and HOA fees alongside principal and interest.
2. Leverage Renovation Equity Carefully: Utilize equity loans strategically for renovations that generate long-term property value.
3. Prioritize Credit Score Optimization: Secure top-tier credit scores prior to mortgage pre-approval to qualify for competitive lender pricing tiers.
The United States Department of State has officially implemented a revised visa policy introducing a mandatory posting requirement for caution payments of up to $20,000 on select foreign travel applications. Under the updated regulatory framework, consular officials are authorized to require temporary nonimmigrant visa applicants from targeted foreign countries to post a refundable financial bond of $20,000 as a condition for visa issuance. The policy mechanism is designed to address diplomatic concerns regarding high overstay rates among temporary visitor, business, and educational visa categories.
The caution bond pilot program applies selectively to foreign nationals from designated countries whose diplomatic entities record historical visa overstay rates exceeding established federal thresholds. Under administrative guidelines published by the State Department, the full financial deposit is posted directly to a dedicated federal escrow account prior to final visa issuance. The entire caution payment is automatically refunded to the applicant upon verified proof of timely departure from the United States in strict compliance with the authorized duration of stay. Conversely, failure to depart within the legal timeframe results in full forfeiture of the posted financial bond to the United States government.
Diplomatic representatives and travel policy experts have expressed varying perspectives regarding the operational implementation of the caution bond system. Administration officials emphasize that the measure serves as an effective, market-based incentive to enforce international travel compliance and preserve domestic immigration security standards. However, international trade organizations and foreign diplomatic missions have raised concerns regarding the financial burden imposed on legitimate business travelers, foreign students, and commercial partners from developing nations.
The United States finalized the rule to make the temporary visa bond program permanent, taking effect on August 3, 2026. The updated permanent regulation replaces the prior 12-month pilot, eliminates the lowest $5,000 tier, and raises the maximum required bond amount to $20,000 for specific B-1/B-2 business and tourist visa applicants.
Here is the list of the 50 countries on the list as o August 3, 2026
Retirement planning strategies are evolving in 2026 to address increased life expectancies, shifting dynamic market conditions, and the transition away from traditional defined-benefit pensions. Individual investors and financial advisors are abandoning rigid retirement models in favor of flexible, multi-asset strategies designed to mitigate longevity risk and preserve purchasing power over multi-decade retirement horizons.
Mitigating Longevity Risk with Dynamic Asset Allocation
As average life expectancies extend past eighty-five years, one of the primary financial risks facing retirees is outliving their accumulated wealth. Traditional fixed income allocations—such as the standard 60/40 equity-to-bond portfolio—are being reevaluated to ensure portfolios generate sufficient capital growth alongside reliable income.
Financial planners recommend maintaining a meaningful equity allocation throughout retirement to offset long-term inflation erosion. High-dividend equity funds, global real estate investment trusts (REITs), and inflation-indexed Treasuries are combined to create diversified portfolios that deliver both growth and income stability.
The Transition to Dynamic Withdrawal Strategies
The classic “4% safe withdrawal rule” is increasingly replaced by dynamic withdrawal strategies that adapt annually based on market performance. Under a dynamic withdrawal framework, retirees adjust their annual distribution rates within pre-set caps and floors:
– Market Upside: During strong market returns, retirees can increase discretionary spending or fund family legacy gifts.
– Market Downturns: During market pullbacks, spending distributions are temporarily reduced to prevent sequence-of-returns risk and preserve core investment principal.
Guaranteed Lifetime Income Options and Deferred Annuities
To establish a guaranteed baseline for essential living expenses, individuals are incorporating modern fixed-indexed and deferred longevity annuities into their broader retirement architectures. Modern annuity structures offer competitive return caps, transparent fee schedules, and inflation-adjustment options.
By funding essential expenses—such as housing, healthcare, and insurance—with guaranteed income streams from Social Security, pensions, and annuities, retirees can manage discretionary investment portfolios with greater flexibility and lower emotional stress during market volatility.
Actionable Steps for Future Retirees
1. Calculate Baseline Retirement Expenses: Determine fixed living costs and map guaranteed income sources to cover essential expenditures.
2. Adopt Flexible Withdrawal Rules: Implement dynamic spending rules to protect investment principal against market downturns.
3. Incorporate Inflation-Protected Assets: Maintain exposure to dividend-growing equities and inflation-indexed bonds to safeguard long-term purchasing power.