Connect with us

Personal Finance

Labor Department issues rule to crack down on bad retirement savings advice

Published

on

The U.S. Department of Labor headquarters in Washington.

Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Biden administration issued a final rule on Tuesday that cracks down on the investment advice that advisors, brokers, insurance agents and others give to retirement savers.

The U.S. Department of Labor regulation — which follows a rule proposal in October — aims to ensure that investment recommendations are in savers’ best interests, according to agency officials.

In legal terms, the final rule expands the scope of when a broker, advisor or other intermediary must act as a “fiduciary,” meaning they are required to give advice that puts the client first.

The final rule takes effect on Sept. 23. It takes up the mantle of a prior effort by the Obama administration to rein in conflicts of interest in retirement accounts. That Obama-era “fiduciary” rule, which experts say was broader than Biden’s, was killed in court.

Current retirement rules don’t provide adequate protections to savers, Labor Department officials said during a press call Tuesday.

Often, advice is tainted by “significant conflicts of interest” and in many circumstances there’s “no obligation” to act in retirement customers’ best interests, said Lisa Gomez, assistant secretary of the Employee Benefits Security Administration.

“That’s not right,” Gomez said.

Fight over fiduciary standard: What 401(k) participants should know

The Labor Department is trying to rein in bad actors relative to two big areas of advice: rollovers from 401(k) plans to individual retirement accounts and purchases of insurance products like annuities, according to retirement and legal experts.

In certain instances, conflicts of interest may allow financial professionals to recommend a transaction that pays them a higher fee but isn’t necessarily best for the client. Such a dynamic can “chip away” at Americans’ savings, Gomez said.

The Council of Economic Advisers estimates Americans lose up to $5 billion a year due to conflicts of interest relative to one insurance product, an indexed annuity.

“For too many people, the retirement plan savings they have through their job are by far the single biggest sources of savings they have,” Gomez said. “These important and tax preferred savings deserve protection, and it is the Department of Labor’s job to make sure they are protected.”

The amount of 401(k)-to-IRA rollovers is ‘astronomical’

The final rule doesn’t differ significantly from the Biden administration’s initial proposal, Labor officials said.

Its elements kick in over two phases.

Starting Sept. 23, the financial industry must acknowledge fiduciary status when working with clients and adhere to “impartial conduct standards.”

Those standards mean financial professionals, when giving personalized investment advice to customers, have an obligation to be prudent, loyal and truthful and charge reasonable fees, for example, Labor officials said.

The remaining parts of the rule kick in a year later, in September 2025, officials said.

More from Personal Finance:
Most retirees don’t delay Social Security benefits
IRS waives mandatory withdrawals from certain inherited IRAs
Women turning ‘peak 65’ may be financially vulnerable

Americans rolled about $779 billion from 401(k)-type plans into IRAs in 2022, according to data cited in a Council of Economic Advisers analysis. Rollovers are common upon retirement, and the annual rollover dollar sum has grown as more baby boomers enter their retirement years.

“The amount of money being rolled over is astronomical,” said Andrew Oringer, partner and general counsel at the Wagner Law Group.

“That juxtaposition of an enormous amount of money and a compensation system that can incentivize the seeking of the rollover without regard necessarily to the best interest of the participant, is something that has concerned the Department of Labor,” Oringer said.   

Meanwhile, industry groups say the regulation isn’t necessary and would harm the very retirement savers the Labor Department is trying to protect.

In a memo issued ahead of the final rule’s publication, the American Council of Life Insurers, a trade group, said the new regulation was shaping up to be “alarmingly similar to the Department’s 2016 regulation” under President Obama.

Before being overturned, that rule caused more than 10 million investor accounts with $900 billion in total savings to lose access to professional financial guidance, ACLI said.

Additionally, federal and state rules governed respectively by the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Insurance Commissioners already offer “robust” consumer protections for retirement savers, ACLI said.

However, there appears to be concern from the Labor Department that the “reach and substance” of those regulatory schemes are “insufficient” in the retirement content, and the agency is trying to “level the playing field,” Oringer said.

Labor officials also said Tuesday that the final fiduciary rule differs significantly from the Obama-era regulation.

“We have done our level best to write a rule that takes the teaching of the Fifth Circuit [Court of Appeals], the lessons we learned from the [public] comments,” and draft a rule that protects investors without putting “undue burden” on the financial industry, said Timothy Hauser, deputy assistant secretary for program operations at the Employee Benefits Security Administration.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Social Security checks may be smaller for some as garnishments begin

Published

on

T-studios2 | E+ | Getty Images

Some Social Security beneficiaries may find their June check is smaller: Starting this month, a share of people’s benefits can be garnished if they’ve defaulted on their student loans.

The Trump administration announced on April 21 that the U.S. Department of Education would resume collection activity on the country’s $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio. For nearly half a decade, the government did not go after those who’d fallen behind as part of Covid-era policies.

More than 450,000 federal student loan borrowers age 62 and older are in default on their federal student loans and likely to be receiving Social Security benefits, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found.

More from Personal Finance:
What the House GOP budget bill means for your money
‘Maycember’ is over — here’s how to recover financially
Court order challenges Trump’s plan to move student loans to SBA

Depending on details like their birth date and when they began receiving benefits, their monthly Social Security check may arrive June 3, 11, 18 or 25, according to the Social Security Administration.

Many Social Security recipients rely on those checks for most, if not all, of their income. So people who are facing a smaller federal benefit as a result of garnishment are likely in a panic, said Nancy Nierman, assistant director of the Education Debt Consumer Assistance Program in New York.

But, Nierman said, “the good news is there are multiple options for borrowers to stop those payment offsets.”

Here’s what you need to know if you’re at risk of a smaller benefit.

How to challenge the garnishment

Federal student borrowers should have received at least a 30-day warning before their Social Security benefit is offset, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

That notice should include information on whom to contact in order to challenge the collection activity, Kantrowitz said. (The alert was likely sent to your last known address, so borrowers should make sure their loan servicer has their correct contact information.)

You may be able to prevent or stop the offset if you can prove a financial hardship or have a pending student loan discharge, Kantrowitz added.

With that in mind, your next step may be pursuing a discharge with your student loan servicer. That’s more likely in circumstances where you have significant health challenges.

“If they are sick or disabled, they can file for a Total & Permanent Disability discharge,” Nierman added.

Borrowers may qualify for a TPD discharge if they suffer from a mental or physical disability that is severe and permanent and prevents them from working. Proof of the disability can come from a doctor, the Social Security Administration or the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Get current on your loans

Another route to stop the offset of Social Security benefits is getting current on the loans, said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit.

You can contact the government’s Default Resolution Group and pursue several different avenues to get out of default, including enrolling in an income-driven repayment plan.

“If Social Security is their only income, their payment under those plans would likely be zero,” Mayotte said.

Student loan default collection restarting

Offset is limited to 15%

Social Security recipients can typically see up to 15% of their monthly benefit reduced to pay back their defaulted student debt, but beneficiaries need to be left with at least $750 a month, experts said.

The offset cap is the same “regardless of the type of benefit,” including retirement and disability payments, said Kantrowitz.

The 15% offset is calculated from your total benefit amount before any deductions, such as your Medicare premium, Kantrowitz said.

When Social Security benefit isn’t enough

Many retirees worry about meeting their bills on a fixed income — with or without facing garnishment, experts said.

Utilizing other relief options may help stretch your funds while you work on stopping the offset to your Social Security benefits.

For example, there are a number of charitable organizations that assist seniors with their health-care costs. At Copays.org you can apply for funds to put toward copays, premiums, deductibles and over-the-counter medications.

The National Patient Advocate Foundation has a financial resource directory in which you can search for local aid for everything from dental care to end-of-life services.

Many older people aren’t taking advantage of all the food assistance available to them, experts say. A 2015 study, for instance, found that less than half of eligible seniors participated in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.

The extra money can go a long way for retirees on a fixed income, though. The maximum benefit a month for a household of one is $292Grocery storesonline retailers and farmers markets accept the funds.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

How Trump ‘big beautiful’ tax bill could change in the Senate

Published

on

Staff members remove a sign following a press conference after the House passage of the tax and spending bill, at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

House Republicans passed a multi-trillion-dollar tax and spending package after months of debate, which included many of President Donald Trump‘s priorities. 

Now, policy experts are bracing for Senate changes as GOP lawmakers aim to finalize the “big bill” by the Fourth of July.

If enacted as currently drafted, the House’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” would make permanent Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, while adding new tax breaks for tip income, overtime pay and older Americans, among other provisions.

More from Personal Finance:
What the House GOP budget bill means for your money
House bill calls for bigger ‘pass-through’ business tax break
What Medicaid and SNAP cuts in House bill mean for benefits

The House bill also approved historic spending cuts to programs for low-income families, including Medicaid health coverage and SNAP, formerly known as food stamps.

“Overall, the [Senate] bill is not going to be that much different,” said Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

But there will be “a lot of debate” about the Medicaid provision, as well as other changes, he said.

Here are some other issues to watch during negotiations, policy experts say.

Fiscal hawks could ‘stop the process’

With control of Congress, Republicans are using a process called “budget reconciliation,” which bypasses the Senate filibuster and only needs a simple majority vote to clear the upper chamber.

But some GOP senators have cost concerns about the House-approved bill.

“We have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit,” Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said last week on CNN’s ‘State of the Union.’

An earlier version of the House package could raise the deficit by an estimated $3.8 trillion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. However, the agency hasn’t released an updated score to reflect the bill’s last-minute changes.

Other cost estimates for the House-passed reconciliation bill have ranged between $2 to $3 trillion over 10 years.

Under reconciliation, the Senate bill also must follow the “Byrd Rule,” which bans anything unrelated to federal revenue or spending.

After the Senate vote, House lawmakers must approve changes to the bill, which could be tricky with a slim Republican majority.

“That’s where the fight is really going to happen,” Gleckman said.

A lower ‘SALT’ deduction limit

One sticking point during the House debate was the current $10,000 limit on the federal deduction for state and local taxes, known as “SALT,” which is scheduled to sunset after 2025.

Enacted by Trump via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, of 2017, the $10,000 cap has been a key issue for certain lawmakers in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey and California.

Before TCJA, filers who itemized tax breaks could claim an unlimited deduction on state and local income taxes, along with property taxes. But the so-called alternative minimum tax reduced the benefit for some higher earners.

After lengthy debate, House Republicans approved a $40,000 SALT limit. If enacted, the higher cap would apply to 2025 and phase out for incomes over $500,000.

Putting tax & spending bill together before July 4th will be 'extremely difficult', says Bill Daley

But the SALT limit is likely to be lower than $40,000 after Senate negotiations, experts say.

Staying closer to the current $10,000 cap “seems like a very natural place to start,” but the final number could be higher, said Alex Muresianu, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation.

Child tax credit could be more generous

The Senate could also expand the child tax credit further, policy experts say.

If enacted in its current form, the House bill would make permanent the maximum $2,000 credit passed via the TCJA, which will otherwise revert to $1,000 after 2025.

The House measure would also make the highest child tax credit $2,500 from 2025 through 2028. After that, the credit’s top value would revert to $2,000 and be indexed for inflation.

But some senators, including Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have called for a bigger tax break. Vice President JD Vance also floated a higher child tax credit during the campaign in August.

With the House-approved tax breaks favoring higher earners, “there’s some recognition that they need to do a little more” for families, Gleckman said.

“That’s going to be a fun one to watch,” he said of the upcoming Senate debate.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

How to save on summer travel in 2025

Published

on

Klaus Vedfelt | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Earlier this spring, consumers were feeling good about their summer vacation prospects. More people were planning to take a trip compared to last year, and summer travel budgets were up, too, according to a new report from Deloitte.

But just a few weeks later — after President Donald Trump announced widescale tariffs and the stock market dropped precipitously, bubbling up recession fears — some would-be vacationers abruptly scaled back their spending plans, a second round of the survey found.

About 53% of respondents plan to take leisure vacations this summer, up from 48% in 2024, according to a new report by Deloitte. 

We still see a strong summer travel season, but perhaps with a more frugal approach.

Kate Ferrara

the transportation, hospitality and services sector leader at Deloitte

The report is based on two surveys: one was conducted between March 26 and April 1, 2025, and another between April 7 and April 9. The first survey reached 1,794 travelers and 2,132 non-travelers while the second reached 1,064 travelers and 880 non-travelers.

Initially, Deloitte found, the average summer travel budget was set to grow 21% year over year, to $4,967. In the second round of the survey, travelers expected to spend just 13% more than last year, or about $4,606.

When looking at budgets for their longest trip of the season, respondents initially planned to spend an average $3,987, 13% more than 2024. That anticipated budget declined to $3,471 in the second poll, an increase of less than 1% from a year ago. 

More from Personal Finance:
Trade tensions drive consumers to cut back
Student loan borrowers brace for wage garnishment
House Republican tax bill favors the rich — how much they stand to gain, and why

Deloitte conducted a second poll because the firm noticed “softness” in consumer spending across other areas of their research, said Kate Ferrara, the transportation, hospitality and services sector leader at Deloitte.

“We still see a strong summer travel season, but perhaps with a more frugal approach,” said Ferrara.

Travel costs are down

Broadly, travel costs have declined, which may help travelers looking to stretch their budget. Hotel room rates are down 2.4% from a year ago, according to a recent report by NerdWallet. Rental car costs are also down 2.1% in that same timeframe, while airfares are down 7.9%.

Round-trip domestic airfare for this summer is averaging $265 per ticket, according to the 2025 summer outlook by Hopper, a travel site. That’s down 3% from $274 in 2024 and down 8% since 2019, the lowest level in three years.

Travel costs for international travel are generally down, said Hayley Berg, the lead economist at Hopper. The average round-trip airfare between the U.S. and Europe, the most popular international destination, costs $850 per ticket this summer, down 8% from 2024, Hopper found.

Frontier CEO on travel demand: The consumer is coming back with a vengeance

In spite of slightly lower prices for travel, people are generally spending more due to inflation, and might have less leftover money to spend on non-essential items like travel, said Deloitte’s Ferrara.

‘The root of all of our hacks’

Of those who reduced their summer travel budgets, 34% of respondents plan to cut back on their in-destination spending activity, such as food or paid guided excursions, Deloitte found. About 30% plan to stay with family and friends instead of paying for lodging, and 21% chose to drive instead of flying to their destination.

You can also save money this summer if you can be flexible with things like when you take the time off, your destination, what you do while you’re there and your mode of transportation, experts say.

“The root of all of our hacks for saving this summer is flexibility,” said Berg.

Airfare tends to spike or be higher during federal holiday weekends like the Fourth of July and Labor Day, Hopper found. This year, prices on these weekends will be about 34% higher compared to other weekends.

Instead of flying in the middle of the summer, consider delaying trips toward the end of the season, in late August or even early September, Berg said. Both price and travel demand will typically drop off by then as the new school year starts and employees go back to regular work schedules, she said.

What’s more, flying in the middle of the week can help save as much as 20% on airfare, per the site’s report.

Traveling on a Tuesday or Wednesday can also help vacationers save about $67 on a round trip domestic flight this summer, Hopper found. That flexibility can help travelers save over $100 on international trips to Europe or Asia. 

Continue Reading

Trending