Finance

How to find profitable small cap stocks

Published

5 months ago

August 22, 2024

Business Finance News

The Russell 2000 may have a profitability problem.

Though the small-cap index gained 10.1% in July, it’s dropped roughly 4% so far in August, as of Thursday morning.

ALPS’ Paul Baiocchi chalks up the volatile moves to the index’s overall composition, with an estimate from Apollo Global showing 40% of those companies have negative earnings.

“[Investors] have basically resigned themselves to the fact that by being in the Russell 2000, I’m just going to have to take the good with the bad,” the firm’s chief ETF strategist told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.

To avoid the profitability drag, Baiocchi suggests investors prioritize quality companies, looking at more selective exchange-traded funds such as his firm’s ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF Shares (OUSM).

“The idea is quality companies that pay and grow their dividends, and importantly, have less volatility than their peers,” he said. “It allows advisors and investors who have seen small caps go sideways for five years to be allocated to a category that’s lagged.”

In addition to its profitability screen, the fund contains just 107 stocks — a fraction of what’s inside the Russell 2000. Its top three holdings are Tradeweb Markets, Juniper Networks and Old Republic International, each sitting at a roughly 2% weighting in the fund, per FactSet.

Shares of the small-cap fund are down 1.5% month to date — outperforming the Russell by more than 2 percentage points in that time.

Disclaimer

Finance

Slower pace ahead for rate cuts

Published

6 hours ago

January 8, 2025

Business Finance News

Federal Reserve officials at their December meeting expressed concern about inflation and the impact that President-elect Donald Trump‘s policies could have, indicating that they would be moving more slowly on interest rate cuts because of the uncertainty, minutes released Wednesday showed.

Without calling out Trump by name, the meeting summary featured at least four mentions about the impact that changes in immigration and trade policy could have on the U.S. economy.

Since Trump’s November election victory, he has signaled plans for aggressive, punitive tariffs on China, Mexico and Canada as well as the other U.S. trading partners. In addition, he intends to pursue more deregulation and mass deportations.

However, the extent of what Trump’s actions will be and specifically how they will be directed creates a band of ambiguity about what is ahead, which Federal Open Market Committee members said would require caution.

“Almost all participants judged that upside risks to the inflation outlook had increased,” the minutes said. “As reasons for this judgment, participants cited recent stronger-than-expected readings on inflation and the likely effects of potential changes in trade and immigration policy.”

FOMC members voted to lower the central bank’s benchmark borrowing rate to a target range of 4.25%-4.5%.

However, they also reduced their outlook for expected cuts in 2025 to two from four in the previous estimate at September’s meeting, assuming quarter-point increments. The Fed cut a full point off the funds rate since September, and current market pricing is indicating just one or two more moves lower this year.

Minutes indicated that the pace of cuts ahead indeed is likely to be slower.

“In discussing the outlook for monetary policy, participants indicated that the Committee was at or near the point at which it would be appropriate to slow the pace of policy easing,” the document said.

Moreover, members agreed that “the policy rate was now significantly closer to its neutral value than when the Committee commenced policy easing in September. In addition, many participants suggested that a variety of factors underlined the need for a careful approach to monetary policy decisions over coming quarters.”

Those conditions include inflation readings that remain above the Fed’s 2% annual target, a solid pace of consumer spending, a stable labor market and otherwise strong economic activity in which gross domestic product had been growing at an above-trend clip through 2024.

“A substantial majority of participants observed that, at the current juncture, with its policy stance still meaningfully restrictive, the Committee was well positioned to take time to assess the evolving outlook for economic activity and inflation, including the economy’s responses to the Committee’s earlier policy actions,” the minutes said.

Officials stressed that future policy moves will be dependent on how the data unfolds and are not on a set schedule. The Fed’s preferred gauge showed core inflation running at 2.4% rate in November, and 2.8% when including food and energy prices, compared with the prior year. The Fed target’s inflation at 2%.

In documents handed out at the meeting, most officials indicated that while they see inflation gravitating down to 2%, they don’t forecast that happening until 2027 and expect that near-term risks are to the upside.

At his news conference following the Dec. 18 rate decision, Chair Jerome Powell likened the situation to “driving on a foggy night or walking into a dark room full of furniture. You just slow down.”

That statement reflected that mindset of meeting participants, many of whom “observed that the current high degree of uncertainty made it appropriate for the Committee to take a gradual approach as it moved toward a neutral policy stance,” the minutes said.

The “dot plot” of individual members’ expectations showed that they expect two more rate cuts in 2026 and possibly another one or two after, ultimately taking the long-run fed funds rate down to 3%.