Connect with us

Economics

How to win Nevada

Published

on

THE END of America’s election season always coincides with Halloween. That can make for some deeply weird campaigning. Democrats in Las Vegas, Nevada, staged a “Project 2025 haunted house” by decorating their offices with skeletons, tombstones—and a video of January 6th 2021. A huge, fuzzy stuffed spider hangs in a web in one corner. “Look what a mess Trump has made”, a poster in front of it reads, “in his web of LIES!” A cardboard cutout of Kamala Harris (wearing a cape) stands watch over the coffee bar, where exhausted campaign staffers nurse their 6pm brews.

With just six electoral votes, Nevada is the least populous of the seven swing states. It has been the friendliest terrain for Democrats in recent elections. Every other swing state went for Donald Trump in 2016, but the last Republican presidential candidate to win in Nevada was George Bush in 2004. Yet the margin of victory for Democrats is always narrow. Joe Biden won the Silver State by just over two percentage points in 2020. As of November 2nd, The Economist’s presidential-forecast model suggests that Nevada is a toss-up. Democrats are losing ground nationally with Latino and working-class voters, who make up significant parts of Nevada’s electorate. But the party’s ground game in Nevada is strong, thanks in large part to the endurance of the political machine built by the late Harry Reid, a former majority leader in the Senate. Can Democrats eke out another win?

Because Nevada’s population is small and centralised, its political geography is easy to understand. There are three regions, electorally speaking, that matter in Nevada: Clark County, Washoe County and the rural parts of the state. Nearly three-quarters of Nevada’s 2.4m registered voters live in Clark County, which includes Las Vegas. These voters lean Democratic. Rural counties—with about 12% of voters—are heavily Republican. And Washoe County, which includes Reno, is swingy. Slightly more Republicans than Democrats live there, but the area has tended to back Democratic presidential candidates and senators in recent years.

In past elections Democrats have been able to run up the vote enough in Las Vegas and its suburbs to offset the Republican Party’s advantage in rural areas. But according to early-voting numbers, that large lead in Clark County has yet to materialise. In fact, Republican early turnout has surged. “Usually it’s been the Democrats who have [early voting] all to their own, and then the Republicans have had to try to play catch-up on election day,” says David Damore, a political-science professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. “Now it’s a little bit reversed.”

Democrats are trying to stay zen. Campaign operatives suggest that mailed ballots, rather than in-person early voting, take longer to arrive and be processed. Their big lead in Clark County is coming, they argue, and the ground game doesn’t need tweaking. Not everyone is so diplomatic. “The Republicans are kicking our ass at the early voting,” exclaimed Dina Titus, a Democratic congresswoman, at a rally for Ms Harris in North Las Vegas on Halloween night. “We cannot let that happen.”

Three questions haunt the early-voting figures, and will determine whether Ms Harris or Mr Trump can claim victory in Nevada this year. The first is whether non-partisans will break for Democrats or Republicans. In 2020 the state began to automatically register Nevadans to vote when they apply for a driver’s licence. This swelled the voter rolls with non-partisans, the default choice. Unaffiliated voters jumped from a quarter of Nevada’s registered voters in 2020 to a third in 2024, and could swing the election for either candidate. Shelby Wiltz, who runs the co-ordinated campaign for Nevada Democrats, insists that the state party’s network and the Harris campaign were built to reach these voters, which skew younger than members of both major parties.

The second question is whether many Republicans will defect. In recent weeks Ms Harris’s campaign has been courting conservatives who cannot bring themselves to vote for Mr Trump. Vanessa Herbin, a 65-year-old Las Vegas resident, had never been to a political rally before arriving at Ms Harris’s gathering on Thursday evening. Supporters swayed to Maná, a Mexican rock band, and shivered in the cool desert night. Mrs Herbin has long voted for Democrats, but says her husband is a registered Republican who is also supporting the vice-president. That’s not the kind of thing that shows up in early-voting data.

Finally, it is unclear whether the Republicans voting early are new and low-propensity voters, who usually sit out elections but were inspired to go to the polls. Or if, at Mr Trump’s urging, Republicans are just voting early instead of on election day. Democrats have taken to calling this the “cannibalisation” of election-day votes. If the former is true, Ms Harris is in deep trouble and Jacky Rosen, a Democratic senator running for re-election, may have a closer race on her hands than polls suggest. If the latter proves to be correct, then the race will still be tight but Ms Harris could be saved by those slow postal votes in Clark County after all. Halloween may be over, but Nevadans are still in for a scare.

Economics

Layoff announcements surge to the most since the pandemic as Musk’s DOGE slices Federal labor force

Published

on

Employees of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) hug each other as they queue outside the Mary E. Switzer Memorial Building, after it was reported that the Trump administration fired staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and at the Food and Drug Administration, as it embarked on its plan to cut 10,000 jobs at HHS, in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 1, 2025. 

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

A surge in federal government job cuts contributed to a near record-setting pace for announced layoffs in March, exceeded only by when the country shut down in 2020 for the Covid pandemic, according to a report Thursday from job placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

Furloughs in the federal government totaled 216,215 for the month, part of a total 275,240 reductions overall in the labor force. Some 280,253 layoffs across 27 agencies in the past two months have been linked to the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency and its efforts to pare down the federal workforce.

The monthly total was surpassed only by April and May of 2020 in the early days of the pandemic when employers announced combined reductions of more than 1 million, according to Challenger records going back to 1989.

“Job cut announcements were dominated last month by Department of Government Efficiency [DOGE] plans to eliminate positions in the federal government,” said Andrew Challenger, senior vice president and workplace expert at the firm. “It would have otherwise been a fairly quiet month for layoffs.”

However, DOGE has continued to cut aggressively across the government.

Various reports have indicated that the Veterans Affairs department could lose 80,000 jobs, the IRS is in line for some 18,000 reductions and Treasury is expected to drop a “substantial” level of workers as well, according to a court filing.

The year to date tally for federal government announced layoffs represents a 672% increase from the same period in 2024, according to Challenger.

To be sure, the outsized layoff plans haven’t made their way into other jobs data.

Weekly unemployment claims have held in a fairly tight range since President Donald Trump took office. Payroll growth has slowed a bit from its pace in 2024 but is still positive, while job openings have receded but only to around their pre-pandemic levels.

However, the Washington, D.C. area has been hit particularly hard by the announced layoffs, which have totaled 278,711 year to date for the city, according to the report.

Get Your Ticket to Pro LIVE

Join us at the New York Stock Exchange!
Uncertain markets? Gain an edge with 
CNBC Pro LIVE, an exclusive, inaugural event at the historic New York Stock Exchange.

In today’s dynamic financial landscape, access to expert insights is paramount. As a CNBC Pro subscriber, we invite you to join us for our first exclusive, in-person CNBC Pro LIVE event at the iconic NYSE on Thursday, June 12.

Join interactive Pro clinics led by our Pros Carter Worth, Dan Niles, and Dan Ives, with a special edition of Pro Talks with Tom Lee. You’ll also get the opportunity to network with CNBC experts, talent and other Pro subscribers during an exciting cocktail hour on the legendary trading floor. Tickets are limited!

Continue Reading

Economics

Trump will ‘buckle under pressure’ if Europe bands together over tariffs: German economy minister

Published

on

BERLIN, GERMANY – FEBRUARY 24: Robert Habeck, chancellor candidate of the German Greens Party, speaks to the media the day after German parliamentary elections on February 24, 2025 in Berlin, Germany. The Greens came in fourth place with 11.6% of the vote, down 2.9% from the previous election. (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

Sean Gallup | Getty Images News | Getty Images

U.S. President Donald Trump will “buckle under pressure” and alter his tariff policies if Europe bands together, acting German economy minister Robert Habeck said Thursday.

“That is what I see, that Donald Trump will buckle under pressure, that he corrects his announcements under pressure, but the logical consequence is that he then also needs to feel the pressure,” he said during a press conference, according to a CNBC translation.

“And this pressure now needs to be unfolded, from Germany, from Europe in the alliance with other countries, and then we will see who is the stronger one in this arm wrestle,” Habeck said.

Elsewhere, outgoing German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he believed the latest tariff decisions by Trump were “fundamentally wrong,” according to a CNBC translation.

The measures are an attack on the global trade order and will result in suffering for the global economy, Scholz said.

On Wednesday, Trump imposed 20% levies on the European Union, including on the bloc’s foremost economy Germany, as he signed a sweeping and aggressive “reciprocal tariff” policy.

Germany is widely regarded as one of the countries likely to be most impacted by Trump’s tariffs, given its heavy economic reliance on trade.

This is a developing story, please check back for updates.

Continue Reading

Economics

The Trump train slows

Published

on

THESE DAYS are dire and dour for Democrats. But April 1st brought a brief reprieve—and not because of jokes. That was the day that the most expensive judicial election in American history in the battleground state of Wisconsin ended in a decisive triumph for the left-leaning candidate. It had drawn $100m of spending, including an estimated $25m from Elon Musk who also, perhaps unhelpfully, personally campaigned in the state. The same day, two special elections in Florida for vacant congressional seats took place in safe Republican districts. Although they did not win, Democrats improved their margins by 17 and 20 percentage points compared with the general elections held just five months ago. Cory Booker, a Democratic senator from New Jersey, staged a one-man protest on the floor of the Senate, excoriating President Donald Trump’s administration for 25 hours straight—a stunt, to be sure, but one that demonstrated proof of life in a party that supporters worried had gone limp.

Continue Reading

Trending