Connect with us

Accounting

Accountants shouldn’t drown in employee purchase reconciliations

Published

on

Among the challenges accountants face is accounting for purchases employees make to get their work done. While the expense report process attempts to address this, it often falls short in providing accurate accounting because it relies on non-accountants entering financial data. The result is typically a time-consuming process for accountants, who must review, reconcile and correct the accounting entries submitted by employees.

The emergence of virtual cards, especially when combined with AI-powered fintech apps, offers accountants a new approach to solving this long-standing challenge.

What is a virtual card?

As many may already know, virtual cards are a type of company-paid credit card that functions like a traditional, physical card with one key difference: There’s no physical card involved. This allows for the creation of an almost unlimited number of unique card numbers, highlighting the brilliance behind virtual cards: intended use.

The concept of “intended use” recognizes that employees have specific scenarios in mind when using a virtual card. This could be to cover the expenses involved in an upcoming business trip, purchasing construction materials for a job or covering necessary permits or fees for cell tower repairs.

Fintech apps can issue virtual cards to employees based on intended use. These apps leverage intended use to determine the appropriate accounting for purchases made with each virtual card. Utilizing virtual cards through a fintech app, the employee experience becomes streamlined, making the process user-friendly. Employees simply select an intended use from a list provided by their organization and enter the desired spending limit. Unlike expense reports, they do not need to enter accounting codes or other financial details. The fintech app automatically determines the correct accounting in the background, eliminating the need for employees to manage complex accounting information.

AI can help improve accuracy

While intended use allows fintech apps to predict the correct accounting, some intended uses allow for an amount of accuracy that isn’t adequate.

An example is the business trip intended use discussed above. The accounting accuracy depends on the chart of accounts for travel-related expenses. If the COA has only one account for travel, then the trip’s intended use will have the necessary accuracy.  If there are expenses for subaccounts such as airfare, lodging, ground transportation and so forth, the trip needs to involve more detail to have the necessary accuracy. This is where AI can help.  

Fintech apps can use AI to analyze purchases made with a given virtual card and its intended use to arrive at the precise accounting for each purchase. The AI involved analyzes large sets of purchases by employees, looking for patterns in accounting. AI is able to consider a wide range of parameters found in these purchases and consider a vast array of possibilities to arrive at the correct accounting.  AI is especially impressive for sophisticated, multidimensional COAs because of its ability to analyze complex patterns.

AI ensures accurate accounting happens automatically, thus avoiding the need for accountants to review the accounting prior to booking purchases into the general ledger. Some fintech apps can automatically make these bookings by posting them to the GL, delivering accountants a completely automated process.

Reconciling credit card statements

In addition, some fintech apps, when combined with virtual card use, can automatically reconcile credit card statements, saving dozens of hours of month-end accounting work. These apps compare the transactions on a statement with purchases made using virtual cards and, because the accounting for these transactions is already confirmed, mark them as reconciled.

They also flag transactions paid with a physical card, instead of a virtual card; how these are handled depends on the fintech app. Some apps integrate with expense management services to verify if accounting data is available for these transactions. If so, the app uses this data and marks the transactions as reconciled.

For transactions without expense management data, AI-enabled apps can automatically predict the appropriate accounting. These apps then give accountants the choice to either use this predicted accounting as final or treat it as an accrual until the transactions appear in the expense management service. In both cases, the apps mark the transactions as reconciled, resulting in a fully reconciled credit card statement, ready for period close.

Streamlining the process

AI-powered fintech apps create a streamlined purchasing and accounting process for both employees and accountants. Before purchasing a good or service, employees simply request a virtual card and indicate its intended use, eliminating the need to input accounting data manually.

These apps can save accountants hours of work by automating the correct accounting for employee purchases and reconciling monthly statements from card issuers, ensuring a smoother, more accurate and efficient process.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending