Connect with us

Accounting

Accountants’ top concerns in the 2024 election year

Published

on

Accountants are fairly evenly divided on the upcoming U.S. presidential election, but they share common ground on the issues that pose the most significant threats to their firms and the profession.

A new survey conducted by Arizent, the parent company of Accounting Today, reveals that accountants consider the economy (51%), the national debt (46%) and tax reform (42%) the most urgent concerns in relation to their firms’ business for the next presidential administration and Congress to address. The 2024 survey collected responses from over 1,200 U.S. business leaders and professionals across accounting firms, banks, payments firms, mortgage lenders, insurance agents, wealth management firms and others.

High interest rates, rising inflation and an economy teetering on the edge of a recession are a top concern for firms of all sizes. Respondents mentioned clients under financial strain and challenges managing cash flow as issues related to the current economy.

“The single most important issue is instability and high inflation that is putting down pressure on the prices that I can charge my clients for services,” an executive at a Western midsized firm responded. “With lower prices, I am limited in the ability to improve the level of services and develop my business.” 

A manager at a small firm in the South responded, “The current economy has caused us to lose some clients because they can no longer afford us. They are not bringing in the same income they were the past few years.”

A staff member at another small firm in the South said, “Our costs have gone up significantly in the past three years, and we have had to pass those costs on to our clients who are getting hit with rising costs from all sides. No one is thriving in this current climate and economy.”

The national debt is another top concern hand-in-hand with worries over the economy. Accountants may be worried about increased government spending, including the additional $80 billion in IRS funding, billions of dollars in student loan forgiveness under the Biden administration, and aid to foreign conflicts like the wars in Ukraine and Israel.

(Dive into the numbers behind accountants’ thoughts about the election.)

Unsurprisingly, tax reform is also top of mind for accountants who already struggle to keep up with the grueling hours of tax season amid the ongoing labor shortage. Accountants say continual changes in the Tax Code make it difficult for them to do their jobs.

“As a CPA who prepares lots of tax returns, the constant changing of the Tax Code and the sunsetting of tax laws that have to be renewed every year and sometimes are not done early enough,” an executive at a small firm in the Northeast responded. “If they are going to make these changes year after year, make them permanent so tax planning can be done more effectively and efficiently.”

Another executive at a small firm in the Midwest said, “Far too many temporary tax laws make it difficult for long-term planning. Retroactive tax changes make it even more difficult for the profession.”

Casting their votes

As for the general election, accountants’ votes will be fairly evenly split between the two major parties. Thirty-five percent say they intend to vote Democrat and 33% intend to vote Republican. Meanwhile, 15% say they are undecided, and the remaining 17% responded as “Other.”

More firms (42%) say a Republican president would be the best outcome for their firm and the profession, compared to 34% who say a Democratic candidate would be best and 18% who say either party would make no difference. Similarly, more firms say a Republican-controlled Senate and House of Representatives would be better than if they were controlled by Democrats.

The common thread between respondents is the level of dissatisfaction with the current political climate. Seventy-one percent report being “very dissatisfied,” 18% “somewhat dissatisfied,” and only 10% “somewhat or very satisfied.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending