Connect with us

Accounting

Life insurance strategies that reduce estate taxes

Published

on

With current estate-tax rules set to expire at the end of next year, life insurance could help heirs to some high net worth clients avoid bigger costs and payments to Uncle Sam in the future.

Purchasing a “whole-life” or “permanent” policy rather than one that runs for a defined term carries much higher premiums — but those and other fees paid by high net worth clients for the insurance product now will go toward tax advantages for their estates’ inheriting beneficiaries down the line. 

As financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients try to make sense of a plethora of questions about the future guidelines looming after many provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire in 2026, life insurance strategies may play a critical role for wealthy estates.

Many registered investment advisory firms are “allergic to life insurance” as a concept, and it’s certainly not “the wrench that fits every nut,” Jack Elder, the senior vice president of advanced sales with Shakopee, Minnesota-based CBS Brokerage, said in an interview. Regardless, clients will likely hear about the potential tax-planning opportunities of buying life insurance from friends, acquaintances or the inevitable sales agent. And locking in the tax rewards now can bring some relief as life-insurance planning frequently comes up in policy proposals aimed at raising the duties paid by wealthy households by closing the loopholes in the code.

“Your clients are going to be approached, so the conversation should start with you,” Elder said. “Somebody’s going to talk to them about life insurance, so it should come from you.”

READ MORE: With Congress slow to act, financial advisors plan ahead on estate taxes

The case for a wealthy client to buy a whole-life policy and hold the contract in a vehicle such as an irrevocable life insurance trust revolves around the fact that, under the current rules, the asset no longer applies to the value of the estate. If they can afford the premiums, then the clients’ heirs will collect the death benefit tax-free in most cases to provide them with liquidity for expenses and give the accompanying cash value of the policy more time to accumulate. 

In a very critical article last year describing whole life policies as often being “sold inappropriately” and “poorly designed for their use,” and pointing out that “you get the cash value or the death benefit, but not both,” the personal finance website for doctors The White Coat Investor nonetheless cited liquidity and tax strategy as a “pro” in the products’ favor.

“An irrevocable trust is a great way to avoid estate taxes,” the website’s founder, Dr. James Dahle wrote. “By placing an asset into an irrevocable trust, any appreciation after that point occurs outside of the estate. However, trust tax rates are notoriously high, and trust tax returns can be complicated and expensive. What if you could put an asset into the trust that grows in a tax-deferred way until death and then provides an income tax-free lump sum? Voila, a whole life policy can do that.”

A strategic gift to heirs using life insurance could reduce the estate’s value for tax purposes and boost the amount that beneficiaries will receive upon a wealthy client’s death by millions of dollars, according to two illustrations that Elder shares with clients. In one example, a couple living in Washington state who are both 66 years old with an estimated longevity of 20 more years and a current net worth of $12 million will have projected wealth of $34.9 million two decades in the future. If they plan for an estate tax of $10.3 million at that time, they could spend $2.8 million on life insurance held in a trust today rather than spending the much higher amount in the future.

READ MORE: Supreme Court case tests how life insurance affects estate-tax valuations

In Elder’s other illustrative example, a couple who are 63 and 64 years old have an estimated net worth of $15.2 million. If they buy a life insurance policy that costs $2 million rather than transferring that directly to an heir, they not only avoid the gift tax, but they could instead pass down $8 million from the proceeds of the death benefits and slash the percentage of their estate that’s taxed at that time by hundreds of basis points while hiking up the heirs’ inheritances by $4.6 million.

“Strategic gifts before 2026 can save your family millions of dollars in estate taxes,” the case study said. “Those who don’t proactively use the exemption risk losing the opportunity to shelter their wealth from estate taxes. Life insurance coupled with strategic gifting can reduce estate taxes and substantially increase your net to heirs.”

Elder’s examples display some of the complexities involved with every individual client. Other complications include the fact that 17 states and the District of Columbia charge their own estate or inheritance taxes. The technical details around the ownership of the policy and a status called the “incidents of ownership,” as well as the date of the death, could also affect whether the proceeds of the death benefits wind up adding to the value of the estate, according to a guide to life insurance written by Trusts and Estates Attorney Jennifer Boyer of the Ward and Smith law firm. (The impact of life-insurance death benefits on estate valuations came up in a recent Supreme Court case.)

“While that taxable estate threshold remains high today ($12,920,000 per person for tax year 2023), it looks fairly certain to dip lower in the coming years,” Boyer wrote. “Without legislative action, in 2026, anyone with more than roughly $6,000,000 (or $12,000,000 for a married couple with appropriate estate tax planning built into their wills) will find themselves on the undesirable side of that taxable threshold. Insurance policy payouts that seemed perfectly reasonable under our currently-high estate tax thresholds may now push taxpayers over the lower limits set to take effect in 2026. If alternative ownership can be arranged, for instance, by using irrevocable trusts, limited partnerships, limited liability companies or direct ownership by children, taxpayers can realize dramatic estate tax savings.”

READ MORE: 26 tips on expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions to review before 2026

In other words, any advisors and clients considering the strategy must look closely at the details of their particular estate and any potential policy before making such a costly purchase. Elder and CBS Brokerage advisors use his examples as “a conversation starter” with their clients rather than a method to use in every situation, he noted.

“The responsibility of an RIA is to expose the clients to all of the solutions and tools that can be used to efficiently transfer wealth and then let the clients decide,” Elder said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending