Connect with us

Accounting

Acting SEC chair remakes agency before Trump pick confirmed

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the agency that regulates Wall Street has yet to be confirmed, but the sweeping changes to the watchdog from his temporary stand-in are starting to pile up.

Within a day of becoming interim chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission in January, Mark Uyeda made his first public move: starting a revamp to the regulator’s approach to cryptocurrencies, once a major source of agency battles. It was the first of many changes at the regulator under the acting chair, and a sign of things to come.

In less than two months, the regulator has not only dropped more than 10 high-profile crypto-enforcement cases, but also rolled back deadlines to comply with three new rules, declared most memecoins exempt from securities laws, made it easier for companies to reject shareholder proposals and ended litigation of landmark climate-reporting regulations.

Trump and his wife, Melania, launched their own memecoins — volatile digital tokens with no underlying assets or obvious practical purpose — in January. He also has ties to crypto project World Liberty Financial, which said this week it had raised a total of $550 million in gross proceeds.

The SEC’s early moves signal that the expected policy U-turn under Trump will be even more dramatic than during the president’s first administration. After Gary Gensler, former President Joe Biden’s SEC chair, pursued an aggressive agenda that won many enemies on Wall Street, much of that effort is being rolled back.

“You have businesses to run, you don’t exist to respond to SEC proposals,” Uyeda said at a recent conference for chief financial officers. His remarks echoed a speech from the previous week, when he described the SEC returning to its “narrow mission to facilitate capital formation, while protecting investors and maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets.”

Uyeda’s “focus is on ensuring the capital markets can facilitate competitiveness and the ingenuity of American industry,” an SEC spokesperson said.

It’s not just a policy and rulemaking shift. Cuts to the federal workforce and curbs on the SEC’s power via an executive order that requires White House approval of new regulations from independent agencies means the watchdog is getting a major shakeup.

‘Dramatic’ changes

“There has never been anything this dramatic or far-reaching as what you’re seeing now,” said Joel Seligman, a law professor at the University of Washington in St. Louis and SEC historian. 

The agency has to proceed carefully, Seligman and four other academics warned in a public letter published this month. Staffing cuts and fewer eyes on the markets didn’t bode well during the 2008 financial crisis, they said, and market players may take advantage of investors if they perceive the SEC as weak or too overloaded to take on enforcement actions.

“With growing concern, we fear that we are watching the SEC face a death by 1,000 cuts,” the professors wrote. “The end result might be a shell of its former self, as the SEC becomes an agency with little power, capacity or independent judgement.”

The SEC declined to comment on the letter, the spokesperson said.

While Uyeda is merely acting chairman of the SEC, he’s seen as smoothing the path for Trump’s nominee to lead the Wall Street regulator permanently: the libertarian-leaning Paul Atkins, who served as SEC commissioner from 2002 to 2008. Uyeda has been with the SEC since 2006, and once served as senior adviser to Atkins.

While the Senate Banking Committee has yet to finalize a date for Atkins’s confirmation hearing, it’s looking to hold it on March 27, said a person with knowledge of the matter who asked not to be identified discussing information that isn’t public. Atkins has yet to file his final financial disclosures, the person said.

The Senate committee is working to quickly consider Trump’s nominees, a spokesperson said. Atkins didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Even before Atkins’s confirmation, businesses see the recent changes as providing an opening. The Managed Funds Association this month sent a 13-page letter outlining its ideas to encourage business-friendly policies. Its requests followed comments from SIFMA, which represents broker-dealers and other financial-services firms and last month urged the SEC to pause fee collections from brokers related to the Consolidated Audit Trail, the costly system used for tracking financial trades and a frequent target of Wall Street ire. 

The SEC has made changes in line with some of those requests and signaled an openness to more.

Exemption, extensions

In February, the regulator exempted personally identifiable information, such as names and birth years, from a requirement for storage in the CAT. Hedge funds and banks trading U.S. Treasuries got an extra year to follow a rule requiring them to centrally clear their trades. And investment managers also will get an extra year to report short-position data. On March 14, the SEC gave investment companies an additional six months to comply with a 2023 rule requiring that at least 80% of a fund’s investments relate to the fund’s name, among other new requirements.

SEC leadership is open to expanding investor access to the private market, such as by revamping the definition of an “accredited investor” or reducing the number of disclosures early-stage public companies have to make, according to speeches Uyeda has given.

The goal is to expand access, both to higher returns for retail investors and to access to capital for businesses, said Jennifer Schulp, director of financial-regulation studies at the Cato Institute. That doesn’t mean the commission’s Republican majority will seek to eliminate the historic divide between public and private markets, she said.

The SEC’s enforcement arm also is getting an overhaul. This month, the regulator announced it would require commissioner signoff before its market-policing unit issues subpoenas.  

Changing priorities

Priority shifts are normal in leadership transitions at financial regulators — even big ones.

In 2017, four Senate Democrats decried what they called an overly aggressive agenda by then-acting SEC Chair Michael Piwowar, who directed agency staff to reevaluate SEC rules on conflict minerals and executive pay. The agency’s inspector general found that Piwowar’s actions were well within his remit as acting head of the SEC. 

What’s different this time around is the torrent of directives from the White House along with the impact of a new Department of Government Efficiency.

“From a policy perspective, much of this was expected,” said Kimberly Hamm, a partner at Mayer Brown and former chief counsel to ex-SEC Chair Jay Clayton. “But the backdrop of the rapid-fire executive orders and federal workforce changes is what makes this challenging.”

Staffing changes

DOGE’s impact has yet to come entirely into view, but the SEC has started some internal shifts. The agency offered incentives for workers to resign or retire early and plans to eliminate the leases for certain regional offices, which oversee a hefty portion of exams and enforcement work.

The SEC also decided to cut the senior-most positions across the regional offices, though the individuals in those roles aren’t being forced out, according to people with knowledge of the matter who asked not to be identified discussing personnel matters.

The uncertainty has led to high anxiety and low morale, even as the agency churns out staff interpretations and policy positions, said people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified to avoid retaliation. A number of workers have taken the offers, resulting in a flurry of farewell emails, while many more staffers are on the hunt for new jobs, the people said. The SEC declined to comment.

“DOGE is the ultimate wild card,” Schulp said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending