Connect with us

Accounting

Acting SEC chair remakes agency before Trump pick confirmed

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the agency that regulates Wall Street has yet to be confirmed, but the sweeping changes to the watchdog from his temporary stand-in are starting to pile up.

Within a day of becoming interim chief of the Securities and Exchange Commission in January, Mark Uyeda made his first public move: starting a revamp to the regulator’s approach to cryptocurrencies, once a major source of agency battles. It was the first of many changes at the regulator under the acting chair, and a sign of things to come.

In less than two months, the regulator has not only dropped more than 10 high-profile crypto-enforcement cases, but also rolled back deadlines to comply with three new rules, declared most memecoins exempt from securities laws, made it easier for companies to reject shareholder proposals and ended litigation of landmark climate-reporting regulations.

Trump and his wife, Melania, launched their own memecoins — volatile digital tokens with no underlying assets or obvious practical purpose — in January. He also has ties to crypto project World Liberty Financial, which said this week it had raised a total of $550 million in gross proceeds.

The SEC’s early moves signal that the expected policy U-turn under Trump will be even more dramatic than during the president’s first administration. After Gary Gensler, former President Joe Biden’s SEC chair, pursued an aggressive agenda that won many enemies on Wall Street, much of that effort is being rolled back.

“You have businesses to run, you don’t exist to respond to SEC proposals,” Uyeda said at a recent conference for chief financial officers. His remarks echoed a speech from the previous week, when he described the SEC returning to its “narrow mission to facilitate capital formation, while protecting investors and maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets.”

Uyeda’s “focus is on ensuring the capital markets can facilitate competitiveness and the ingenuity of American industry,” an SEC spokesperson said.

It’s not just a policy and rulemaking shift. Cuts to the federal workforce and curbs on the SEC’s power via an executive order that requires White House approval of new regulations from independent agencies means the watchdog is getting a major shakeup.

‘Dramatic’ changes

“There has never been anything this dramatic or far-reaching as what you’re seeing now,” said Joel Seligman, a law professor at the University of Washington in St. Louis and SEC historian. 

The agency has to proceed carefully, Seligman and four other academics warned in a public letter published this month. Staffing cuts and fewer eyes on the markets didn’t bode well during the 2008 financial crisis, they said, and market players may take advantage of investors if they perceive the SEC as weak or too overloaded to take on enforcement actions.

“With growing concern, we fear that we are watching the SEC face a death by 1,000 cuts,” the professors wrote. “The end result might be a shell of its former self, as the SEC becomes an agency with little power, capacity or independent judgement.”

The SEC declined to comment on the letter, the spokesperson said.

While Uyeda is merely acting chairman of the SEC, he’s seen as smoothing the path for Trump’s nominee to lead the Wall Street regulator permanently: the libertarian-leaning Paul Atkins, who served as SEC commissioner from 2002 to 2008. Uyeda has been with the SEC since 2006, and once served as senior adviser to Atkins.

While the Senate Banking Committee has yet to finalize a date for Atkins’s confirmation hearing, it’s looking to hold it on March 27, said a person with knowledge of the matter who asked not to be identified discussing information that isn’t public. Atkins has yet to file his final financial disclosures, the person said.

The Senate committee is working to quickly consider Trump’s nominees, a spokesperson said. Atkins didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Even before Atkins’s confirmation, businesses see the recent changes as providing an opening. The Managed Funds Association this month sent a 13-page letter outlining its ideas to encourage business-friendly policies. Its requests followed comments from SIFMA, which represents broker-dealers and other financial-services firms and last month urged the SEC to pause fee collections from brokers related to the Consolidated Audit Trail, the costly system used for tracking financial trades and a frequent target of Wall Street ire. 

The SEC has made changes in line with some of those requests and signaled an openness to more.

Exemption, extensions

In February, the regulator exempted personally identifiable information, such as names and birth years, from a requirement for storage in the CAT. Hedge funds and banks trading U.S. Treasuries got an extra year to follow a rule requiring them to centrally clear their trades. And investment managers also will get an extra year to report short-position data. On March 14, the SEC gave investment companies an additional six months to comply with a 2023 rule requiring that at least 80% of a fund’s investments relate to the fund’s name, among other new requirements.

SEC leadership is open to expanding investor access to the private market, such as by revamping the definition of an “accredited investor” or reducing the number of disclosures early-stage public companies have to make, according to speeches Uyeda has given.

The goal is to expand access, both to higher returns for retail investors and to access to capital for businesses, said Jennifer Schulp, director of financial-regulation studies at the Cato Institute. That doesn’t mean the commission’s Republican majority will seek to eliminate the historic divide between public and private markets, she said.

The SEC’s enforcement arm also is getting an overhaul. This month, the regulator announced it would require commissioner signoff before its market-policing unit issues subpoenas.  

Changing priorities

Priority shifts are normal in leadership transitions at financial regulators — even big ones.

In 2017, four Senate Democrats decried what they called an overly aggressive agenda by then-acting SEC Chair Michael Piwowar, who directed agency staff to reevaluate SEC rules on conflict minerals and executive pay. The agency’s inspector general found that Piwowar’s actions were well within his remit as acting head of the SEC. 

What’s different this time around is the torrent of directives from the White House along with the impact of a new Department of Government Efficiency.

“From a policy perspective, much of this was expected,” said Kimberly Hamm, a partner at Mayer Brown and former chief counsel to ex-SEC Chair Jay Clayton. “But the backdrop of the rapid-fire executive orders and federal workforce changes is what makes this challenging.”

Staffing changes

DOGE’s impact has yet to come entirely into view, but the SEC has started some internal shifts. The agency offered incentives for workers to resign or retire early and plans to eliminate the leases for certain regional offices, which oversee a hefty portion of exams and enforcement work.

The SEC also decided to cut the senior-most positions across the regional offices, though the individuals in those roles aren’t being forced out, according to people with knowledge of the matter who asked not to be identified discussing personnel matters.

The uncertainty has led to high anxiety and low morale, even as the agency churns out staff interpretations and policy positions, said people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified to avoid retaliation. A number of workers have taken the offers, resulting in a flurry of farewell emails, while many more staffers are on the hunt for new jobs, the people said. The SEC declined to comment.

“DOGE is the ultimate wild card,” Schulp said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending