Connect with us

Accounting

AI titans flex clout to leverage tax bill to override state laws

Published

on

Powerful Silicon Valley leaders are throwing their weight behind the tech industry’s drive to use Donald Trump’s tax bill to sweep away state regulations on artificial intelligence.

A handful of Republican lawmakers have expressed staunch opposition to the measure — which they deride as a giveaway to the biggest tech companies — endangering swift passage of the industry priority.

But AI titans’ success in persuading the Trump administration and Republican congressional leaders to incorporate the controversial 10-year ban into the party’s centerpiece legislation is a stunning demonstration of their ascendant influence in Washington. 

Palmer Luckey, founder of defense tech company Anduril Industries Inc., took to the social media platform X on Wednesday to implore Republican lawmakers not to drop the ban on state regulation from the legislation, calling it “absolutely critical for the economic, educational, military and cultural future of America.”

Marc Andreessen, head of the leading venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and one of Trump’s most prominent tech industry allies, on Wednesday also shared posts advocating for the provision.

Even if the pause on state AI laws is excluded from the tax bill, the maneuver shows key power centers of the Republican party firmly behind the AI industry’s wish for minimal regulatory interference as the emerging technology enters a potentially pivotal phase.

That influence is likely to shape the Trump administration’s executive actions and possibly future legislation unburdened by the tight timetable and complicated politics of the tax bill.

Trump Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick joined the social media campaign Wednesday on behalf of the ban, calling it essential to “to stay ahead of our adversaries and keep America at the forefront of AI.”

The 10-year ban tucked into the House version of the tax bill and current Senate draft would block states from enforcing AI laws. In the absence of federal regulation, states over the past few years have enacted dozens of new laws — curbing deepfakes, protecting artists, banning algorithmic discrimination — aimed at preventing harms from the nascent technology.

The ban is a top priority for big tech companies like Meta Platforms Inc. as well as venture capital firms, such as Andreessen Horowitz, which backs smaller but still powerful players. 

“Don’t expect it to disappear,” said Joseph Hoefer, AI policy lead at lobbying firm Monument Advocacy, who represents clients including Booz Allen Hamilton and Atlassian Corp. “This provision, or some version of it, will likely become a mainstay in any serious AI legislation going forward.”

But the unified Democratic opposition to Trump’s tax bill and the president’s eagerness for quick passage give Republican opponents of a ban a lot of leverage since the party can afford to lose only three Republican senators.

At least four Republican senators expressed reservations about the ban on AI regulation in interviews. Republican senators Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Josh Hawley of Missouri have both vowed to strip the provision from the legislation.

“We cannot prohibit states across the country from protecting Americans, including the vibrant creative community in Tennessee, from the harms of AI,” said Blackburn, whose state has a new law that protects musicians and artists from unauthorized AI use and is home to country music capital Nashville.

Florida Republican Senator Rick Scott told Bloomberg News he believes Congress has to “continue to allow our states to innovate.” Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said a decade-long freeze “might be a little long.” 

Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, on Wednesday released an updated version of his committee’s portion of the bill that specifies states could still pass “tech-neutral laws” that impact AI, such as broader consumer protection or intellectual property laws.

Supporters of the ban, including industry lobbyists, are seizing on the opportunity to influence congressional action by flooding the Hill this week to convince Republicans the AI provision should remain in Trump’s bill. 

Companies have largely deferred to trade associations like the Chamber of Commerce and tech groups like INCOMPAS in the lobbying fight. The Chamber of Commerce in a statement said they support the provision because it would stop “confusing” state and local AI regulations.

“We cannot afford to wake up to a future where 50 different states have enacted 50 conflicting approaches to AI safety and security,” said Fred Humphries, corporate vice president of US government affairs for Microsoft Corp. 

White House tech advisor Michael Kratsios and AI czar David Sacks have publicly and privately praised the idea of a ban on state regulation.

Kratsios at a Bloomberg event earlier this month said there are “significant downsides” to a patchwork of state regulations and supports a national standard, which he added would benefit smaller tech companies in the market.

A spokesperson for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy said the office has “not been involved” in conversations about the bill. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The struggle has highlighted internal Republican battle lines over how to handle the fast-moving technology backed by trillions of dollars in investments.

Hardline conservative critics, including the influential think tank Heritage Foundation, say the proposal would infringe on states’ ability to protect their citizens against risks posed by AI. Officials in all 50 states, including some Republican attorneys general, and dozens of advocacy groups have also criticized the GOP effort.  

Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, a Democrat, said he plans to file an amendment to strip the moratorium out of the tax legislation. Republican opponents expect to join forces with Democrats to try to kill the measure. 

“It’s pretty clear that there’s a bipartisan opposition,” Markey said.

Conservative Republicans in the House also vowed to oppose the provision.

But some supporters of the regulation ban still are optimistic it will remain in the tax package.

 “I don’t even think this is the top 10 most controversial things in the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ politically,” said Neil Chilson, head of AI policy with the tech-backed Abundance Institute. “There will be horse-trading. I think this has a real shot.”

And the support of key Trump officials signals the path the administration is setting. Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar, earlier this month said the moratorium is the “correct small government position.”

“The America First position should be to support a moderate and innovation-friendly regulatory regime at the federal level, which will help rather than hobble the U.S. in winning the AI race,” Sacks said in a post on X.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending