Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA recommends careful IRS transition away from paper checks

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs hopes to smooth the transition away from paper checks at the Internal Revenue Service.

The AICPA sent a letter last week to the Treasury Department offering feedback and recommendations on the implementation of President Trump’s Executive Order 14247, Modernizing Payments To and From America’s Bank Accounts. The order requires the Treasury to stop issuing paper checks for all federal disbursements, such as tax refunds, and requires all payments made by the federal government to be electronically processed. 

The order also mandates that issuing paper checks for federal disbursements should cease by Sept. 30, 2025, and that all federal receipts should be processed electronically as soon as practicable to the extent permitted by law. That seems like too abrupt a transition, however.

The AICPA acknowledged that the adoption of an electronic system for federal disbursements and receipts would increase efficiency, reduce costs and significantly diminish the occurrence of lost or stolen checks. The AICPA noted it has supported the transition to electronic payments for federal disbursements and receipts, but pointed out there are challenges with implementing a system that imposes a mandate on taxpayers to have a U.S. bank account in order to participate. Requiring a U.S. bank account for electronic tax payments could exclude vulnerable taxpayers such as seniors and the “unbanked” population, while international banking rules currently limit automated clearing house transfers with non-U.S. financial institutions.

“For many years, the AICPA has advocated for and supported the modernization of the IRS and its payment systems; although this executive order is a step in the right direction, there are many considerations before implementing changes, which means updated processes and carefully tailored rules will need to be developed,” said Daniel Hauffe, senior manager for tax policy and advocacy with the AICPA, in a statement last Thursday. “The AICPA’s recommendations allow for the modernization of the IRS’ tax payment systems while mitigating the impact of the administrative burden on taxpayers, tax practitioners and the IRS that could be caused by this executive order.”

The AICPA’s letter cites a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration on the 2024 filing season saying that, for the most recent tax year, nearly 7 million taxpayers were issued refunds through a method other than electronic payment.  

The AICPA asked the Treasury consider the following recommendations:

  • Implement exceptions to the order for individuals and business entities not physically present in the U.S. that do not have a U.S. bank account. 
  • Exempt temporary non-U.S. individuals – such as short-term business visitors – from electronic payment mandates, allowing them to receive tax refunds by paper check. AICPA also recommended allowing individuals without a Social Security Number or individual taxpayer identification number to make tax payments by check until their taxpayer identification is issued, helping them meet their obligations and avoid penalties. 
  • Expand Electronic Federal Tax Payment System capabilities, which would enable business accounts to submit payments on behalf of individuals for Form 1040 and 1040-NR, including estimated tax payments, extension payments and balances due. There should be no cap on the number of individual transactions a business account can process. 
  • Exempt all trust and estate income tax return filings from the requirements of the order until Form 1041 has been updated with the appropriate information and that implementation of the order be delayed for trusts and estates until Treasury and the IRS can address certain issues concerning the administration of an estate or trust.In addition, the AICPA recommended the Treasury and the IRS allow trusts and estates to pay via IRS Direct Pay, rather than have to set up an EFTPS account. 
  • Provide specific guidance regarding how exceptions will be applied for and granted to qualified taxpayers to whom this order would present an undue burden, including individuals over the age of 65 and taxpayers who are unable or unwilling to obtain U.S. bank accounts. The AICPA also recommends that taxpayers granted an exception have the option to receive tax refunds as a paper check or through a direct express card. 
  • Extend the timeframe for implementation of the order or that, at a minimum, the Secretary offer meaningful transitional rules when facilitating the transition of the federal disbursement and receipt system to being exclusively electronic. 
  • Consider seeking statutory authority for the mandates outlined in the executive order, which would provide a solid foundation for this transition to electronic payments. 
  • Convene a group of stakeholders, including the AICPA, to assist with the establishment of rules and processes for implementing the order.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending