Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA warns IRS not to combine tax pro offices

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs sent a letter to the Internal Revenue Service urging the IRS not to merge its Office of Professional Responsibility with its Return Preparer Office, saying the combination would lead to confusion.

The Trump administration has been steadily downsizing the federal government since taking office this year, initially through the Department of Government Efficiency, or U.S. DOGE Service, that was led by Elon Musk until his rancorous departure from the White House amid a dispute over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and through the Office of Management and Budget led by White House Budget Director Russell Vought, one of the main authors of the Project 2025 blueprint. The IRS reportedly lost over 25,000 employees this year, or more than 25% of its workforce, although some have been rehired.

In a letter to the leaders of the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility and the Return Preparer Office, the AICPA argued that combining OPR and RPO would hurt taxpayers, “The AICPA strongly opposes any effort to combine OPR and RPO because it would inappropriately consolidate credentialed and uncredentialed return preparers under OPR, create potential conflicts of interest, and divert resources from the primary role of OPR,” wrote AICPA Tax Executive Committee chair Cheri Freeh in a letter last week. “Ultimately, this would sow confusion among taxpayers trying to understand the differing qualifications and practice rights of preparers, which would harm taxpayers and erode taxpayer confidence in our tax system.”

She noted that OPR has the exclusive delegated authority to interpret and enforce the regulations in the Treasury Department’s Circular 230 rules, which governs tax practitioners interacting with the tax administration system. OPR’s responsibilities include investigating referrals of alleged misconduct, instituting disciplinary proceedings, and exercising disciplinary authority for violations of Circular 230. RPO administers the Preparer Tax Identification Number program, manages the enrolled agent practitioner program, encourages enrollment in the Annual Filing Season Program, and processes some complaints against return preparers. “RPO’s responsibilities are compliance focused, while OPR’s responsibilities are supervisory and regulatory,” she wrote. “The two offices perform dissimilar government functions, oversee different types of preparers, and, therefore, should remain separate to avoid potential conflicts of interest.”

The AICPA contended that combining OPR and RPO would divert resources and hinder OPR’s ability to enforce professional standards and maintain the integrity of tax professionals.

“Furthermore, the potential combination of OPR and RPO could undermine the credibility of OPR’s objective to enforce professional standards by integrating the processing of complaints against return preparers with the enforcement function and by collapsing the application process for enrolled agents and OPR’s separate appellate authority for enrollment appeals,” she added.

The AICPA also wants to safeguard the role of CPAs and avoid confusing the public with tax preparers who lack credentials and continuing education requirements. 

“Uncredentialed preparers need only to obtain a PTIN to engage in federal tax return preparation,” said Freeh. “The different qualifications and practice rights of tax return preparers can confuse taxpayers. Combining OPR and RPO would significantly increase that confusion and would cause harm to taxpayers. A combined OPR unit would give the dangerous and false impression to taxpayers that all return preparers have the authority to practice before the IRS and are subject to the standards of conduct under Circular 230. This would blur the public’s ability to perceive the distinction between credentialed, uncredentialed, and unenrolled preparers.”

The AICPA warned that with a combined OPR unit, “unscrupulous and incompetent preparers could readily misrepresent that they are subject to ethical obligations overseen by the ‘Office of Professional Responsibility,’ which would give such preparers a foothold to abuse taxpayers and undermine public trust and accountability in the tax profession,” said Freeh. “These negative effects of a combined OPR unit could have the unintended consequence of diluting the credibility and public benefit of credentialed preparers’ licensures and diminishing the professional standards adhered to by credentialed preparers, which would harm our entire tax system without providing any corresponding benefit.”

The AICPA is coming out firmly against combining the units. “In summary, the AICPA strongly opposes the consolidation of OPR and RPO because the negative consequences to our tax system eclipse any nominal efficiencies arising from a combined OPR unit,” Freeh wrote.. “Ultimately, now is not the time to reorganize these two units.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending