Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: A template for next tax season

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Most accountants have just completed their tax season for last year’s returns and are probably not thinking about their next tax season. But they should.  The following is a template for a plan with suggested responses.

Purpose of tax season:

Suggested response: To provide clients with an accurately prepared tax return on a timely basis and where all tax savings techniques are applied along with suggestions made to save taxes going forward.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quality of the work done by the preparer:

Suggested response: All returns submitted by the preparers to the reviewers should be error free.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Role of tax return reviewer:

Suggested response: The reviewer should spot check the return to see that it appears to be correct, compare the return with the prior year’s return and look to understand major differences, look for explanations of surprise results, and look for planning opportunities for the current return and for the following year’s return to suggest to the client. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

How the reviewer should handle errors found by them on the return:

Suggested response: The reviewer should reassign the tax return to the preparer to make the corrections and should not make any corrections regardless of time pressures. Comment: Part of effective and lasting training is to have preparers fix all errors since they will learn better about their mistakes and will be able to work better in the future to avoid such types of errors. When the reviewer corrects the tax return, the learning would be lost, added time would be spent by the reviewer not only making the correction but in communicating the nature of the error to the preparer at a later time when neither would have that incident fresh in their minds. Also when the preparer knows the errors will be caught and fixed by a reviewer there is a lessening of care in their performance. A side issue is that when the reviewer fixes the error, no one will be reviewing that change reducing the quality control over the tax return.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Efforts to reduce tax season workload compression:

Suggested response: Workload compression can be reduced if some of the work that can be done prior to mid-December will be done. This includes all complicated transactions a client engaged in during the year, most of which are known about at this time. This would include sales of real estate, businesses, business interests or inherited assets or collectibles. Other transactions would include stepping up the basis for inherited real estate or determining tax attributes of assets divided in a divorce. Clients with rental or business income could provide their accounting records now to be reviewed to make sure cash accounts or other schedules reconcile or are in balance. There are many other situations and calling a client to check in and find out what went on during the year might uncover work that could be shifted to now rather than the busiest time of the year for you. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Efforts to reduce the workload of reviewers:

Suggested response: Since most firms have many more preparers than reviewers, it would be beneficial to shift work from the reviewers to the preparers. Four suggestions are: 1) to have the preparers compare every item on the return with the previous year’s return and understand any differences and prepare a memo on those reasons; 2) have the preparer look at every bottom line result to determine if it was a surprise or fully expected and prepare a memo explaining their impression of the result and their reason for that impression; 3) have a peer preparer review the return before it is submitted to the reviewer; and 4) have the preparer use the reviewer’s checklist and prepare a memo for everything that the reviewer would specifically be checking. Comment: Some of these procedures will add more work time for the preparer than the time saved by the reviewer, increasing the total time on that return. This is so, but the preparer’s time is more readily available than the reviewer’s time and at substantially lower rates. Also, by having the reviewer’s workload reduced on processes that could be passed down, the reviewer would have more time to concentrate on adding value to the client’s tax return. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

The above highlight six areas I consider essential to maintaining a smooth and calm tax season. I’ve provided my opinions, but to make this effective for you, add your opinions and compare them to mine. Then decide whether you are happy with your system or if changes are in order. 

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending