Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: A template for next tax season

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Most accountants have just completed their tax season for last year’s returns and are probably not thinking about their next tax season. But they should.  The following is a template for a plan with suggested responses.

Purpose of tax season:

Suggested response: To provide clients with an accurately prepared tax return on a timely basis and where all tax savings techniques are applied along with suggestions made to save taxes going forward.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quality of the work done by the preparer:

Suggested response: All returns submitted by the preparers to the reviewers should be error free.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Role of tax return reviewer:

Suggested response: The reviewer should spot check the return to see that it appears to be correct, compare the return with the prior year’s return and look to understand major differences, look for explanations of surprise results, and look for planning opportunities for the current return and for the following year’s return to suggest to the client. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

How the reviewer should handle errors found by them on the return:

Suggested response: The reviewer should reassign the tax return to the preparer to make the corrections and should not make any corrections regardless of time pressures. Comment: Part of effective and lasting training is to have preparers fix all errors since they will learn better about their mistakes and will be able to work better in the future to avoid such types of errors. When the reviewer corrects the tax return, the learning would be lost, added time would be spent by the reviewer not only making the correction but in communicating the nature of the error to the preparer at a later time when neither would have that incident fresh in their minds. Also when the preparer knows the errors will be caught and fixed by a reviewer there is a lessening of care in their performance. A side issue is that when the reviewer fixes the error, no one will be reviewing that change reducing the quality control over the tax return.

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Efforts to reduce tax season workload compression:

Suggested response: Workload compression can be reduced if some of the work that can be done prior to mid-December will be done. This includes all complicated transactions a client engaged in during the year, most of which are known about at this time. This would include sales of real estate, businesses, business interests or inherited assets or collectibles. Other transactions would include stepping up the basis for inherited real estate or determining tax attributes of assets divided in a divorce. Clients with rental or business income could provide their accounting records now to be reviewed to make sure cash accounts or other schedules reconcile or are in balance. There are many other situations and calling a client to check in and find out what went on during the year might uncover work that could be shifted to now rather than the busiest time of the year for you. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

Efforts to reduce the workload of reviewers:

Suggested response: Since most firms have many more preparers than reviewers, it would be beneficial to shift work from the reviewers to the preparers. Four suggestions are: 1) to have the preparers compare every item on the return with the previous year’s return and understand any differences and prepare a memo on those reasons; 2) have the preparer look at every bottom line result to determine if it was a surprise or fully expected and prepare a memo explaining their impression of the result and their reason for that impression; 3) have a peer preparer review the return before it is submitted to the reviewer; and 4) have the preparer use the reviewer’s checklist and prepare a memo for everything that the reviewer would specifically be checking. Comment: Some of these procedures will add more work time for the preparer than the time saved by the reviewer, increasing the total time on that return. This is so, but the preparer’s time is more readily available than the reviewer’s time and at substantially lower rates. Also, by having the reviewer’s workload reduced on processes that could be passed down, the reviewer would have more time to concentrate on adding value to the client’s tax return. 

Your response: ________________________________________________________________________   _____________________________________________________________________________________  _____________________________________________________________________________________

The above highlight six areas I consider essential to maintaining a smooth and calm tax season. I’ve provided my opinions, but to make this effective for you, add your opinions and compare them to mine. Then decide whether you are happy with your system or if changes are in order. 

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending