Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: Accountants’ growing services

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

Last week I wrote about finding out what your clients need and finding ways to provide it to them. I think that is a great strategy. However, I have another strategy, and that is to develop services you think clients would need and offer those. The following are some illustrations of services that have been successful this way, along with suggestions of added services you could impress upon your clients the importance of engaging you to perform those services for them. 

  • Small business accounting software: When QuickBooks and its DOS predecessors were introduced, we approached our clients to adopt them with us, leading them into the use of such software. Today it is pretty much universal, but that wasn’t so in the early 1980s when PCs were first made available. 
  • Client accounting services: CAS services were always available through the smaller accounting firms, but about 10 years ago the larger firms started aggressively promoting these services. Many clients today are abandoning their inhouse bookkeepers for the CAS services provided by accounting firms. This has also grown into outsourced fractional advisory and CFO services. The clients did not come to us with this need; we went to them. This also includes payroll processing and other accounting functions that typically have been performed in-house, although payroll processing was way ahead of this trend.
  • Business valuations services as benchmarks to measure growth in value: Clients always ask what we think their business is worth, and we usually reply with some vague comments. Developing a method to initially value the business and then updating it annually can be an effective way of easing clients into a value creation mindset rather than by them only looking at the annual profits or free cash flow. 
  • Assisting clients with a buy-sell agreement: Many clients with multiple owners either do not have a buy-sell agreement or a current one. This is an important issue, and the absence of such an agreement could cause many problems and consternation if there is a death of one of the owners or a sudden disability. Outdated agreements also should be brought up to current and projected reality. This is a service where you could suggest being engaged to facilitate a series of meetings to have the clients get it done. 
  • Internal control review: Clients do not lose sleep over taxes but do lose sleep wondering if they have proper controls in place. When an audit is performed, we have myriad checklists and processes to follow and then usually prepare a management letter with comments. Many times the current year’s management letter repeats what was in the previous year’s. A suggestion is to present an engagement proposal to assist in implementing some of the necessary changes. For your non-audit clients, you could use the audit programs and techniques to perform a full accounting control review of their business. These are clients you are familiar with, and it should not be too difficult to come up with a fixed fee. This could be segmented into two stages: an exploratory stage and an implementation stage. The exploratory stage would be similar to what you do on an audit and would include a memo similar to what is included in the management letter. The implementation could be left to the client. If they have no action on it for about six months, you could present your proposal for this implementation stage.
  • Attorney trust accounts: These must be maintained carefully and exactly. A suggested service for lawyers is to do a “surprise” reconciliation of the bank account balances and the amounts held for clients, and then to assist in straightening out anything that isn’t fully in order.
  • An 11-year profit and loss trend analysis: The P&L analysis can be prepared to assist clients in their long-range planning. This would start with the previous five year’s summary P&L, an annualization of the current year and then using the trends to project the next five years. You should include data such as the number of sales invoices, average sale per invoice, units sold, gross margins and percent of materials purchased to sales for each year, employee headcount and sales per full-time employee, sales from the top five or 10 customers and whatever other data clients use to manage their businesses. I usually start with a freebee of the 11-year P&L and tell clients what else should be done, the benefits to them and my charges. Freebees take time, but if this is an ongoing relationship I believe you should have this information at your fingertips. It is also a way to start a discussion about where the client thinks the business is headed and their efforts in that going forward. 
  • Succession planning: This is something every business client needs, but most do not want to confront. This service not only helps a client prepare for their exit, but also provides the comfort that the business could continue operating in their absence and their governance documents are in order, that someone could step in to sign checks if they are not available for some reason, and that they could plan an extended vacation trip without worrying the business would collapse. This can also segue into how clients envision their personal future with or without the business, how strong some of their key personnel are in managing and leadership, and their relationships with customers, vendors and personnel.
  • Assisting not-for-profit organizations in added services: CAS and audits are typical services  provided to NFP clients. However, they usually need many other services, including designing controls; reviewing procurement procedures, grant applications and compliance; managing cash flow; handling tax compliance for unrelated business activities; financial literacy training for board members; and assisting with onboarding a new CEO, CFO or controller.
  • Retirement income and estate liquidity for older clients: These are a concern for clients contemplating retiring or those concerned about the disposition of their estates and liquidity for the surviving spouses and others that depend upon the client for their cash flow.

All of the above have been provided by me, and the clients were usually introduced to these services by me. Usually, the proposal was generated because of my concern for the client or because of an opening created by something the client said but wasn’t able to fully articulate their concerns. The above is a small sampling, and there are many other situations where an independent CPA or financial advisor could assist clients. It requires listening, being receptive to tip-offs by the client, and actually proposing to assist in these areas. Waiting for the client to ask for such help could be like waiting for a train that already left the station.

The above suggests ways to grow your practice (and revenue), add interesting specialties, develop staff in a greater variety of services, and really help clients by the added value, personal financial security and wealth management provided by our assistance.

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Published

on

Mandatory ESG Reporting Standards Demand Standardized Non-Financial Audit Trails

Corporate accounting departments face an expanded regulatory mandate as mandatory sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting frameworks take full effect internationally. Governed by the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) IFRS S1 and S2 standards, enterprise financial controllers are now legally required to track, verify, and report non-financial data with the same internal controls and auditability as traditional financial statements.

The expansion shifts ESG compliance

This regulatory expansion shifts ESG compliance from marketing departments to corporate accounting offices. Financial managers are now responsible for gathering, consolidating, and verifying carbon emissions metrics, supply chain labor conditions, water usage, and climate risk exposures across multi-tiered corporate structures. These non-financial metrics must be integrated into standardized general ledgers to withstand rigorous third-party audit assurance processes.

To comply with these rigorous reporting mandates, accounting software providers have added dedicated ESG modules designed to aggregate data from IoT sensors, utility platforms, and vendor management systems. Controllers are implementing internal control frameworks—modeled after traditional COSO frameworks—to ensure the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of sustainability disclosures, protecting organizations against greenwashing penalties and litigation risks.

The transition requires significant cross-functional collaboration between accounting teams, legal counsel, and operational directors. Accounting professionals are expanding their technical expertise beyond financial ledgers to master carbon accounting methodologies, lifecycle assessment standards, and non-financial data governance protocols, fundamentally expanding the role of the modern corporate accountant.

Why This Information Matters
Mandatory ESG disclosures require companies to treat environmental and social metrics as audited financial records. Executives, accountants, and board members must institute formal tracking and assurance processes to satisfy legal mandates, maintain investor confidence, and mitigate regulatory non-compliance risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Trending