Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: I practice what I preach

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

I write about what I did that was successful. It is my way of giving back to the CPA profession that has been great for me. I grew, as did my firm, my staff, my clients and everyone associated with my partners and me. I take great pride in the growth I burgeon. Some of what I did might seem nutsy, but I had my sights set on building a business and that required leveraging my partners and myself. And that took an investment that sometimes seemed unconventional. Here are three stories of some things I did:

Story 1: I always felt that the best way of training someone was for them to correct their own errors, no matter what! I figured that if they did, they would never make that type of error again, and they would also try to reduce future errors to avoid any inconveniences caused by having to fix them. 

One time when I had my NYC practice, it was tax season and I called a staff person around 3:00. I told him he had to come to the office that night to fix an error on a tax return he prepared. I told him I wanted to get it out that night, it was going to be delivered by a taxi that night, and he had to fix it before 8:00. He lived in Queens and went to a client in Long Island. That was like a “vacation day” since he could easily drive to the client and also be home for an early dinner, with no overtime that night. He was a little put out, but he knew he had to come back. He called me a few minutes afterward and asked if he could drive to the office rather than take the subway, would we pay the parking, and I said we would. Also, we paid overtime, so he would get paid for the time fixing the return, but not for the travel time. When he got into the office, I showed him the tax return where he had to fix the zip code which he had wrong. That was the only error and, if looks could kill, I would have been dead at that very moment. He said nothing, fixed it and left.

I told this story about a dozen years ago at a CPE program and that staff person was sitting in the front row. He called out that it was him and remembered how angry he was at me. He also said that “because of that, I never made a mistake on a name or address ever again.” He also now had his own very successful practice. I didn’t remember who it was, but he reminded me. Question: If the reviewer fixed the zip code, how many future similar errors do you think he would have made?

Story 2: The first book I wrote was titled Successful Tax Planning. It was for businesspeople and was very successful. I decided I wanted to publish a professional edition to be sold to accountants and hired a law school student to add citations and references. He seemed like a go-getter, having previously worked part-time on a political campaign. I wanted to set a serious tone with him and also show him this was thoughtful research work, even though we were CPAs and not attorneys. At that time the Tax Code added Section 465. I held up a paperback copy of the Code, opened it to Section 465 and pointed to the word “interest.” I told him I needed a definition of that word and that we would meet in three days to discuss what he came up with. He looked at me like I was crazy, but when we met, he told me he did not have a clue.

My purpose was to show him that nothing in taxes and tax planning was simple or obvious and to get him to understand that I needed him to be very thorough, disciplined and exact, that maybe he didn’t know everything and perhaps I would be able to teach him something.

This project was never completed, getting pushed aside by more urgent or important projects and possibly by my losing interest in becoming a “book publisher.” However, he migrated into tax preparation and planning and some review work. We offered him a permanent job when he graduated law school and he stayed a few years, leaving for a “better opportunity” and ending up in his own tax practice. He built a substantial practice with one of his sons, also an attorney, who is now running it while he is pleasantly clipping coupons on a Florida beach.

My first “exercise” was my investment to get him on board with “my way of doing things.” It worked, and he did great work for us for the time he was with us.

Story 3: Sometimes when you meet a job applicant, there is a spark that shines through, and you just know this is the right person for you. That happened with a young woman we were interviewing. We hired her and sometime during the first week she was working on a humongous aged accounts receivable schedule. She completed it very well, but there was an error of, if I remember correctly, 11 cents in its being balanced perfectly. This was in the early days of computerized spreadsheets. I told her I needed it balanced exactly. She spent a couple of days on it and eventually got it to balance. I explained to her that the 11 cents wasn’t a concern or material. In fact it was completely immaterial, but I wanted her to learn that whatever she worked on had to balance. All she was doing was taking some numbers from one place and reproducing them in another place and there was no reason for them not to match. 

That was my investment to teach her to be careful, work deliberately and that speed was not more important than error-free work. She worked for us for 10 years until she left for a job in private accounting close to her home and her three children. She was single when she started working for us.

There are many more stories, but I particularly like these as I am still in touch with these three people. Each story was costly at the time, but that became an investment that paid great dividends. I recommend taking the long view with your practice and to not miss any opportunity to train a staff person properly. My partners and I practiced what we preached, and we had a very successful practice. These ideas are being continued by us through Withum.

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending