Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: I practice what I preach

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

I write about what I did that was successful. It is my way of giving back to the CPA profession that has been great for me. I grew, as did my firm, my staff, my clients and everyone associated with my partners and me. I take great pride in the growth I burgeon. Some of what I did might seem nutsy, but I had my sights set on building a business and that required leveraging my partners and myself. And that took an investment that sometimes seemed unconventional. Here are three stories of some things I did:

Story 1: I always felt that the best way of training someone was for them to correct their own errors, no matter what! I figured that if they did, they would never make that type of error again, and they would also try to reduce future errors to avoid any inconveniences caused by having to fix them. 

One time when I had my NYC practice, it was tax season and I called a staff person around 3:00. I told him he had to come to the office that night to fix an error on a tax return he prepared. I told him I wanted to get it out that night, it was going to be delivered by a taxi that night, and he had to fix it before 8:00. He lived in Queens and went to a client in Long Island. That was like a “vacation day” since he could easily drive to the client and also be home for an early dinner, with no overtime that night. He was a little put out, but he knew he had to come back. He called me a few minutes afterward and asked if he could drive to the office rather than take the subway, would we pay the parking, and I said we would. Also, we paid overtime, so he would get paid for the time fixing the return, but not for the travel time. When he got into the office, I showed him the tax return where he had to fix the zip code which he had wrong. That was the only error and, if looks could kill, I would have been dead at that very moment. He said nothing, fixed it and left.

I told this story about a dozen years ago at a CPE program and that staff person was sitting in the front row. He called out that it was him and remembered how angry he was at me. He also said that “because of that, I never made a mistake on a name or address ever again.” He also now had his own very successful practice. I didn’t remember who it was, but he reminded me. Question: If the reviewer fixed the zip code, how many future similar errors do you think he would have made?

Story 2: The first book I wrote was titled Successful Tax Planning. It was for businesspeople and was very successful. I decided I wanted to publish a professional edition to be sold to accountants and hired a law school student to add citations and references. He seemed like a go-getter, having previously worked part-time on a political campaign. I wanted to set a serious tone with him and also show him this was thoughtful research work, even though we were CPAs and not attorneys. At that time the Tax Code added Section 465. I held up a paperback copy of the Code, opened it to Section 465 and pointed to the word “interest.” I told him I needed a definition of that word and that we would meet in three days to discuss what he came up with. He looked at me like I was crazy, but when we met, he told me he did not have a clue.

My purpose was to show him that nothing in taxes and tax planning was simple or obvious and to get him to understand that I needed him to be very thorough, disciplined and exact, that maybe he didn’t know everything and perhaps I would be able to teach him something.

This project was never completed, getting pushed aside by more urgent or important projects and possibly by my losing interest in becoming a “book publisher.” However, he migrated into tax preparation and planning and some review work. We offered him a permanent job when he graduated law school and he stayed a few years, leaving for a “better opportunity” and ending up in his own tax practice. He built a substantial practice with one of his sons, also an attorney, who is now running it while he is pleasantly clipping coupons on a Florida beach.

My first “exercise” was my investment to get him on board with “my way of doing things.” It worked, and he did great work for us for the time he was with us.

Story 3: Sometimes when you meet a job applicant, there is a spark that shines through, and you just know this is the right person for you. That happened with a young woman we were interviewing. We hired her and sometime during the first week she was working on a humongous aged accounts receivable schedule. She completed it very well, but there was an error of, if I remember correctly, 11 cents in its being balanced perfectly. This was in the early days of computerized spreadsheets. I told her I needed it balanced exactly. She spent a couple of days on it and eventually got it to balance. I explained to her that the 11 cents wasn’t a concern or material. In fact it was completely immaterial, but I wanted her to learn that whatever she worked on had to balance. All she was doing was taking some numbers from one place and reproducing them in another place and there was no reason for them not to match. 

That was my investment to teach her to be careful, work deliberately and that speed was not more important than error-free work. She worked for us for 10 years until she left for a job in private accounting close to her home and her three children. She was single when she started working for us.

There are many more stories, but I particularly like these as I am still in touch with these three people. Each story was costly at the time, but that became an investment that paid great dividends. I recommend taking the long view with your practice and to not miss any opportunity to train a staff person properly. My partners and I practiced what we preached, and we had a very successful practice. These ideas are being continued by us through Withum.

Do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending