Connect with us

Accounting

Assessing PE’s ‘great lab experiment,’ four years in

Published

on

All accounting firms should be eyeing private equity, according to speakers at Accounting Today’s 2025 PE Summit, whether as an option or for the way it will continue to rapidly transform the profession.

Private equity has “raised the bar” in shaping a more competitive landscape in accounting, panelists repeated throughout the conference, held Nov. 19 to 20 in Chicago.

Allan Closeup - PE Summit.jpg

Allan Koltin

“In 2030, what we recognize today won’t exist,” said Allan Koltin, CEO of Koltin Consulting Group, PE Summit co-chair, and keynote speaker. “We are going to blink, and [it will be] November 19, 2030. We are no longer preparing financial statements and tax returns. Lead off the next board meeting, strategic planning session, partner retreat with, ‘What do we need to be doing today?’ That is the strategic question of the decade.”

Koltin and his fellow speakers urged attendees to take stock of the changes since private equity first penetrated accounting back in 2021, when a pair of Top 25 Firms — EisnerAmper and Citrin Cooperman — took PE investments from TowerBrook Capital Partners and New Mountain Capital, respectively. 

The collective growth fueled by those investments, and the several since — including the establishment of PE-backed platforms and other PE models — will only accelerate, said Koltin.

“The rate of change in the last five years has been insane,” he told attendees. “Think back to the steady-Eddie, run the play that’s called [days]. Strategic planning was where to go for lunch Saturday. What was there to plan? The next five years will be more change than the last years.”

Transformation is coming whether firms explore private equity for themselves or adjust to how it is leveling up their peers.

“2020 to 2025 is the golden age of public accounting,” Koltin said. “Who shined most was the leadership. I don’t care if you are private equity-owned or fiercely independent. What I do care, is that you have a strategy to figure out how to make this work.”

“The panel of fiercely independent firms,” Koltin continued, referencing an earlier PE Summit session on staying independent, “they are listening and learning. One thing private equity did indisputably was it raised the bar on performance. Better, tougher decisions are continuing to challenge us, and I think that made the profession all the better.”

Koltin’s sentiments — that whether independent or PE-owned, accounting firms cannot afford to ignore these changes — were echoed throughout the event.

“Most disturbing is one that doesn’t explore [private equity],” he said. “You don’t know what you don’t know. We have a fiduciary obligation to our partners and to our people. In October 2021, when PE came to be, we called it a great lab experiment, it had never been done before, and how would it work. Four years and two months later…” Koltin paused, before listing some of the numerous PE-backed firms, platforms, ESOP firms, “motherships,” rollups and more that have sprouted up since. “I don’t know of a group not hitting their numbers. They don’t want to unwind it, they want to keep going.”

What’s next

Even firms considering themselves too small to realize the PE trend might soon find themselves targeted, explained PE Summit co-chair Phil Whitman, CEO of Whitman Advisory, who said he is seeing private equity groups and venture capitalists “looking at much smaller firms.”

Co-chair panel - PE Summit.jpg

PE Summit co-chairs (from left to right): Phil Whitman, Bob Lewis and Allan Koltin

“I believe we are going to see continued significant competition for those smaller firms,” Whitman predicted, and added: “2026 is going to be the year of the tuck in.”

Bob Lewis, another PE Summit co-chair and president of Visionary Group, shared his own predictions during the same panel, including a similar change of scale: “another wave is coming, of minority investment.”

These shifts will be partially due to the very active current market, Koltin explained.

“The dirty, dark secret is there are way more buyers than eligible firms,” he shared. “Oftentimes, we are now telling firms, ‘We wish you came to us in 2021, 2022, 2023. It’s a saturated market. [PE firms] are going to need to see something spectacular or different — ‘We only want tax, or high-net-worth, or we only want CAS.'” 

While specialization will continue to be a strategic advantage, firms will continue to contend with what the infusion of more capital into accounting — including the subsequent boost to technology like AI and new workforce models — will mean to its people. 

“The war for talent will be over by 2030,” Koltin announced. “When accountants show up today, they are starting at A3 [level], and the work [below that] is going away. They are being pushed into the fire faster than we were ever able to do that. I think that’s so exciting.”

“By 2030, we will no longer be preparing — humans, in our firms, will not be preparing tax returns and financial statements,” he continued. “AI and offshoring coming together will do that. The upper partners already advising clients, will have more time to do that, to service A clients. How wonderful! The ones I worry about are the bottom third, the pure production.”

Firms’ “superstars,” though, will have their time to shine, Koltin said — as long as they can be paid. “There’s nothing worse than telling a superstar, ‘We feel bad, the firm had a bad year and can’t pay you.'”

Successful firms — those turbocharged with PE funding or the “fiercely independent” ones strategizing to remain competitive — all require one thing, according to Koltin.

“Leaders, it is your moment, what we’ve been auditioning for,” he said. “See where your firm is, and where it needs to be.” 

He commended the firm executives in the crowd for taking the initiative of attending the PE Summit. “You’re the ones here, today and tomorrow, networking, with the opportunity to collaborate… Leaders, this is your moment,” he repeated. “Figure out, strategically, what is best for your firm.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending