Connect with us

Accounting

Audit teams missed risks of material misstatement by banks

Published

on

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board staff released a report Monday on how during 2022 and 2023, several firms’ engagement teams working on audits in the banking sector did not adequately identify the risks of material misstatement ahead of the high-profile implosion of several banks.

The Spotlight report, “Bank Financial Reporting Audits, discusses the PCAOB’s inspection response to bank failures in early 2023 and the continued effects of these bank failures on the banking industry and includes an overview of survey responses outlining how dozens of U.S. firms responded to disruptions in the banking industry, including impacts from rising interest rates. It also includes some observations from the PCAOB’s inspection activities, along with a description of good practices at audit firms in key focus areas.

The PCAOB encouraged firms to consider some of the potential risks, including increased volatility in financial and commodity markets due to fluctuations in interest rates and inflationary trends in an earlier Spotlight report, “Staff Overview for Planned 2022 Inspections,” which was published in June 2022.

PCAOB logo - office - NEW 2022

Then, after vulnerabilities in the banking sector were exposed in early 2023 as high-profile banks such as Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank went under, the PCAOB revised its inspection plan to respond in real time, including sending a questionnaire to survey 40 U.S. firms that audit at least one bank, with additional emphasis on the 13 U.S. firms that audit 10 or more banks. The survey was designed to provide insight into how firms evaluated emerging and evolving risks in the sector.

In reviewing the survey responses, the PCAOB found that over 70% of the engagement teams it surveyed did not identify a risk of material misstatement due to rising interest rates. Over 95% did not identify a risk of material misstatement related to liquidity. Over 95% did not identify a risk of material misstatement through reviewing information from short sellers, analysts, or other publicly available information, and over 65% did not identify any risk of material misstatement related to concentration risks. Finally, over 95% of the engagement teams did not identify a risk of fraud related to investments or related disclosures. A few firms indicated rising interest rates were a “business-only” risk, relating to the operations of the bank without directly influencing financial reporting.

As they reviewed the banking sector audits completed in early 2023 for financial statements dated in late 2022, PCAOB inspectors noticed a variety of deficiencies. In some instances, for example, engagement teams did not revisit initial risk assessments performed earlier in the year as interest rates continued to rise. Inspectors also observed instances of interest rate volatility being documented as an operational or business issue – with no financial reporting or internal control over financial reporting considerations.

As a result, some engagement teams did not identify in their audits certain risks of material misstatement despite changes in bank-specific or macroeconomic conditions that indicated increased risk in certain audit areas.

In response to the survey results, the PCAOB adjusted its inspection plan, telling its target team to perform procedures on interim reviews of banks in order to provide real-time perspective on important risks. Inspectors also chose additional bank audits for inspection, and worked to ensure emerging banking and economic trends, and banking issues or common deficiencies, were appropriately considered in our selections.

In addition to some common observations from the PCAOB’s inspection activities, the Spotlight report provides a description of good practices observed at audit firms that may enhance audit quality if broadly adopted. The Spotlight provides these insights in in four focus areas: investment securities, allowance for credit losses, deposit liabilities, and loans and related accounts.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending