B. Riley Financial Inc., the embattled investment firm, is struggling to value its assets after months of concern about flawed accounting and a federal investigation culminated in a 52% one-day plunge.
The investment firm late Monday said it couldn’t file its quarterly report with regulators on time, promising only that it would file “as promptly as practical.” The delay, it said, was due to problems in valuing its loans and investments — similar to a weakness auditors identified in April in the company’s annual report.
The Los Angeles-based investment firm suspended its dividend, announced its biggest-ever quarterly loss and confirmed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the business. B. Riley faces a widening U.S. probe into its accounting practices and deals with a former business partner tied to a collapsed investment fund, Bloomberg News reported.
That sent B. Riley’s shares into a tailspin, and lenders to the firm and its founder sought to reassure investors on the value of the collateral they hold. It’s the third time this year that B. Riley missed a regulatory filing deadline.
Bryant Riley
Jon Kopaloff/Photographer: Jon Kopaloff/Getty
The SEC is assessing whether the Los Angeles-based investment firm adequately disclosed the risks embedded in some of its assets, people familiar with the matter said. The agency is also seeking information on the interactions between founder Bryant Riley and longtime business partner Brian Kahn, the former chief executive of Franchise Group Inc., or FRG, the people said. FRG is one of B. Riley’s larger investment holdings.
The inquiry includes a review of possible improper trading by other insiders, said the people, who asked for anonymity because the probe hasn’t been announced by the agency. Another topic regulators have asked about is the movement between companies of receivables due from cash-strapped retail customers whose repayment might be doubtful, the people said.
The SEC’s overlapping civil probes, which involve agency lawyers in Los Angeles, Washington and Philadelphia, are proceeding along with a federal criminal inquiry in New Jersey. Prosecutors are examining the 2020 collapse of an investment fund, Prophecy Asset Management, where Kahn handled most of its assets.
Prophecy investors who lost money have questioned in a lawsuit whether Kahn improperly used Prophecy proceeds to acquire control of FRG for himself. A co-founder of that fund pleaded guilty in November in a $294 million fraud case and is cooperating with prosecutors, who tagged Kahn as an unindicted co-conspirator, Bloomberg previously reported.
Subpoenas received
Bryant Riley told investors in a Monday conference call that he and the company received subpoenas in July from the SEC focused mainly on B. Riley’s dealings with Kahn.
“We are responding to the subpoenas and are fully cooperating with the SEC,” Bryant Riley said. He expects the SEC will conclude “that we had no involvement with or knowledge of any alleged misconduct concerning Brian Kahn or his affiliates.”
Representatives for Kahn didn’t respond to messages seeking comment. Representatives for the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in New Jersey declined to comment. Kahn, Riley and their companies haven’t been charged with anything by authorities, and the U.S. probes could conclude with no action against any of them.
“At no time during my former business relationship with Prophecy did I know that Prophecy or its principals were allegedly defrauding their investors, nor did I conspire in any fraud,” Kahn said in a November statement.
B. Riley on Monday warned of losses as it wrote down a portion of its stake in FRG and a related loan receivable. It’s expecting a non-cash markdown of about $330 million to $370 million on those assets, according to a company statement. The firm expects losses for the quarter ended June 30 to total $435 million to $475 million.
The SEC investigation is advancing as B. Riley tries to bounce back from two annual losses and correct flaws in its controls identified by its auditors this year. Short sellers have targeted the stock, which has tumbled in the year after B. Riley helped Kahn stage a management-led buyout of FRG.
B. Riley’s finances are complicated by a series of loans, receivables and other asset transfers between the company, FRG and Kahn. Some of those assets and debts underpin the value of other parts of B. Riley’s empire, and short sellers contend that the writedowns could create a domino-like effect on the company’s finances. B. Riley has firmly rejected such a scenario.
Nomura loan
One of the biggest pieces was the FRG buyout deal, which was funded in part by a $600 million loan that Nomura Holdings Inc. arranged for B. Riley as the administrative agent. The Tokyo-based bank committed $240 million to the debt itself, more than any other lender, Bloomberg News has reported.
B. Riley put up about $1.5 billion of various assets as collateral for the Nomura debt. That included about $220 million of FRG shares and another $200 million in the form of a loan to Kahn that was itself secured by more FRG stock.
Bloomberg reported in January that a team of external advisers had encouraged Nomura to write down the value of its loan to B. Riley, citing the allegations against Kahn and warning that the collateral for the debt could be tainted by fraud. Officials at Nomura took no action at that time.
Nomura said in an emailed statement Monday that it holds less than 25% of the syndicated credit facility, which was funded at about $474 million as of March 31. “Our loan is secured and collateral is significant, with FRG-related assets comprising a minority,” Nomura said.
Separately, Bryant Riley — the firm’s biggest individual shareholder — took out a loan in 2019 from Axos Bank in which he pledged 4,389,553 company shares as collateral, according to a B. Riley filing. The loan “is secured by multiple collateral types in addition to pledged shares,” an Axos spokesperson said Monday via email. “This collateral, other than B. Riley stock, is sufficient to secure a majority of the underlying loan.”
The bank’s spokesperson declined to say whether dropping to a specific price would compel Riley to repay the loan or sell some shares.
FRG’s debt to its own lenders is trading at deeply distressed levels, and the firm hired advisers to help find ways to ease the burden. It’s also been hurt by the demise of Conn’s Inc., another furniture chain that went bankrupt within months after buying rival W.S. Badcock from FRG.
Conn’s debt
Conn’s owed B. Riley at least $93 million on a loan when it filed for court protection, according to company filings. B. Riley had said it expects to be fully repaid. Meanwhile, FRG holds a stake in Conn’s preferred shares, which it received as payment for the Badcock sale. The stake is convertible into Conn’s common stock, but those shares have since collapsed with the bankruptcy, slashing the value of FRG’s holdings.
In turn, B. Riley owns almost a third of FRG’s equity. B. Riley has downplayed the potential impact of Conn’s misfortune, saying FRG’s stake was a small part of that firm’s overall holdings.
But S&P Global Ratings said in a July 24 credit downgrade that Conn’s bankruptcy could lead to FRG violating the terms of its own loan. FRG’s capital structure “appears to be unsustainable,” S&P said in its analysis, and its scenario for recoveries after a default showed little or nothing for second-lien term lenders — which typically means equity holders would be left empty handed.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.