Connect with us

Accounting

Bennett Thrasher makes plans for changes in 2026

Published

on

Bennett Thrasher CEO Jeff Call is making plans for his Top 75 Firm next year as it ramps up the use of artificial intelligence and helps clients adjust to changes from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

“From my perspective, I think we’re going to continue to see continued change,” Call told Accounting Today. “Obviously, there’s a lot of moving parts of what’s going on in the industry. There’s consolidation and a pretty substantial use of technology, AI, automation, as well as continued use of offshore resources, another element that we see is a pretty regular occurrence for the Top 100 Firms.”

His Atlanta-based firm is working hard to adjust to all those elements and make sure to integrate them into its strategy, which includes staying independent from private equity funding

“We do believe we are in our best position as an independent firm,” said Call. “We have resisted private equity. We’re continuing to invest in our people, continuing to build out additional resources, bringing in high-quality lateral talent, and continuing to innovate and deliver five-star client service to our clients on a regular basis.”

He believes that staying independent helps his firm provide higher-quality service. “A number of firms, as they’re going through private equity and other transactions, are getting distracted by other things that maybe become top of mind for their new ownership,” said Call. “We believe that if we continue to thrive on the client service side, take great care of our people and take great care of our clients, that will continue to let us be a differentiated firm that will have continued strong growth.”

M&A deals

Bennett Thrasher has not been doing many mergers and acquisitions in recent years, unlike PE-funded firms that seem to make M&A deals an intrinsic part of their growth strategy.

“We have looked at some smaller transactions,” said Call. “That is still something that we would like to do, but it’s not a massive part of our strategy. Most of our strategy is based on organic growth. All of our partners and our growth team are very focused on growing the firm organically. We have brought in some lateral partners. Maybe you’d call that an ‘aqui-hire’ opportunity, where you bring in a talented person at the partner level, and they are able to try and bring in clients that they have relationships with. We would like to do full-scale acquisitions, but they have not been a major part of our strategy. We don’t expect that is likely to be the case, partly just because of some of the forces at play with private equity.”

M&A transactions at Bennett Thrasher have differed from the practices at many PE-funded firms. “Our transactions have traditionally some upfront cash, some earnout, and then participation as equity in Bennett Thrasher, whereas the private equity firm transactions are very heavily cash oriented on the front end,” said Call. “Unless we wanted to leverage our balance sheet, we wouldn’t have the kind of cash to do those transactions, so we’ve generally been more focused on lateral integrations and building the talent organically.”

He expects to see more of his clients doing M&A deals of their own, however. “We’ve continued to see pretty strong growth in the mergers and acquisitions space,” said Call. “Our transaction advisory services practice is one of the fastest-growing areas in our firm, growing more than 30% a year. They primarily operate in the middle market, but the middle market activity has still been strong. There hasn’t been much pause in that space from what we’ve seen, at least with our client base, so we anticipate that may improve even more as interest rates go down. A lot of these transactions are private equity or private credit type transactions, and as interest rates are lower, that allows them to be more willing to use leverage and keep that market in a strong position.”

Tariff and shutdown effects

The firm has been helping clients who are concerned about tariffs affecting their business. “There was a little bit of disruption from that, probably in the earlier part of this year,” said Call. “I do feel like business centers don’t like uncertainty, so as it appeared that the tariff numbers were starting to move around, those things do cause some clients that have international operations to pause big investment decisions and things of that nature. We’ve seen that stabilize a little bit more recently, so I think business centers have started making decisions and moving forward with whatever they thought the rules were going to be. Certainly it would be helpful if there was complete clarity and some of the legal Supreme Court decisions, etc., still put some of these elements into question as to which way the tariff action will be going.”

However, he pointed out that businesses can’t wait until the Supreme Court hands down a decision in the tariff case before they start moving forward. 

Clients also had to weather the recent government shutdown, which was still ongoing when Call was interviewed last month. 

“We have seen some disruption from the IRS in dealing on some matters,” said Call. “Some aspects of the IRS have reduced staff, or some of the groups aren’t available to be a resource, so that has slowed down some interactions with the IRS. I think all the filing activities still continue, because for the most part, that’s all done electronically. But if you need to interact with a real person at the IRS with respect to an audit or other notice issues or other payment issues that you’re dealing with, trying to get a live person on the phone is more challenging in today’s environment.”

OBBBA impact

He is hopeful about the future of his firm and his clients next year after passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last July. “We do expect in 2026 we will see some pretty good growth potential across our clients’ businesses,” said Call. “Obviously some aspects of the OBBBA are going to encourage investment, and we will see clients making more substantial investments with some of the bonus depreciation and other elements that may have reduced some of the regulations in certain areas to make it certain tax-advantaged investments. We do a lot of work in the technology, construction and entertainment [sectors], and I’ve definitely seen strong activity there, especially in technology. I think the R&D credit getting clarified was a big aspect to that, so we do expect that will probably be a nice improvement for the technology-based companies to have clarity on that [Section] 174 area that was previously being hampered by reducing the benefit of R&D expenditures.”

He expects more clients to invest in research and development now. “It’s more tax advantaged to make that investment today than it was,” said Call. “We had a couple years there where they paused some of the benefits of R&D expenditures. I do anticipate that will be more positive for that industry.”

AI and automation

In the meantime, his own firm has been investing more heavily in technology such as artificial intelligence for automation. “Continued use and leaning into AI and automation is a big trend,” said Call. “We’re investing in tools that are trying to help us automate certain tasks that might be more elementary, that maybe our staff people don’t enjoy doing, and allow them to be more advisory oriented and able to take on more of a consulting and advisory role at an earlier point in their career. Using those AI and automation tools should allow them to be able to be more business advisors to our clients and less focused on the elementary or lower-level compliance tasks that maybe are less desirable. We’re spending more time training and upskilling our people to help elevate them to that trusted advisor status at a quicker pace than maybe they would have in the past.”

Bennett Thrasher recently held a partner retreat where a researcher talked about some of the trends in the accounting profession. “There’s a continued push toward advisory in the space, in general,” said Call. “For us, our advisory practice probably makes up 25 or 30% of our entire business, so that has been a practice that we’ve continued to be investing in and launching new services. I anticipate that will continue to be the case. I think advisory practices are anticipated to grow at faster rates than traditional audit and tax compliance areas.”

Bennett Thrasher intends to continue to invest in its traditional audit and tax compliance practices as well, but Call anticipates the growth levels there might be a little more subdued than from its traditional tax consulting and other advisory-oriented practices. 

“Forensic accounting, transaction advisory services, technology consulting, outsourced accounting are going to have more robust growth rates because people are looking for advisory-oriented solutions that they believe are going to add more value to their business,” he added, “and so we are putting more continued emphasis on that area.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending