Connect with us

Accounting

Beware of video communication pitfalls

Published

on

As many of you know, I’m a big believer in using short videos to enhance communication with clients and team members. In response to articles such as Video summaries take center stage at tax time, 4 productivity tools your firm cannot go without and The future is asynchronous, many Accounting Today readers shared stories about how they were also using video, too. Great. But let’s also talk about some pitfalls to watch out for as you leverage video.

Video can be very effective when you have a relatively complex topic and you want to save time and eliminate lots of back and forth. Video allows you to show your face, which builds trust with the recipient. It also allows you to show a screen so you can walk your recipient through a document, spreadsheet or concept, and they can easily follow along. For instance, I can highlight certain document components (like a tax return), and my team member or client can be on the same page, literally.

It’s almost like we’re having a real-time conversation. Video can be a great time-saver, too. Videos are easy to record (three minutes is plenty). With a little practice, you’ll nail them on the first take. Meanwhile, the viewer/recipient can watch the video at their leisure and re-watch it — or slow down the playback speed — if they need to review something the presenter has said. I’ve found videos to be much more efficient than sending lots of emails back and forth or trying to play phone tag. 

Things to keep in mind

While helpful, video can sometimes hinder communication if you’re not diligent. For example, a mortgage broker working with one of my clients sent us a 15-minute video discussing various mortgage options. The video was way too long, didn’t reference any specific numbers, and didn’t have a specific recommendation. How would you feel if you received a 15-minute voicemail?  You’d never listen to the entire message. Nobody has that kind of attention span these days.

That’s not all. The broker’s “presentation” was monotonous. It was just 15 minutes of him rambling on. Two or three minutes would have been plenty. There were no visual aids such as graphics, tables or worksheets to help illustrate his points. There were no comparisons of the different mortgage options. Worst of all, there was no reason for the message to be in video format because he wasn’t making use of the medium. It took the entire 15 minutes to figure out he wasn’t really giving us the answers we needed about mortgage options. Brutal. It was a classic case of “content” and “medium” being out of alignment. Instead, a phone call to my client would have been better. Or a brief email would have sufficed by simply saying, “You have two choices: A or B. Here’s what I recommend and why.”

Since the realtor wasn’t going through anything specific on the screen, video wasn’t helping his case – and it probably hurt him. Because the video was so long and didn’t deliver much value, my client and I were resentful that it used up so much of our time. Further, there was no interactivity in the broker’s video. 

If you’re making lots of assumptions in a long format message, you might run into issues. As soon as you make the wrong assumptions, the client/viewer will disengage and assume the presenter doesn’t know what they’re talking about. That’s all the more reason to keep your videos brief and focused on a single point to make them most impactful. Finally, the broker’s video was poorly organized. It was essentially 15 minutes of “show up and throw up.” The broker just rambled and rambled without a logical flow.

Because you can express thoughts faster on video than you can by writing them out, you want to think carefully about what you want to say before you hit the “Play” button. 

A summary of video pitfalls

1. The realtor didn’t use the right medium. A conversation or email would have been more effective for his purposes.

2. The video was too long and didn’t use visual aids to break up the narrative.

3. There were too many moving parts requiring two-way dialogue (which wasn’t achieved with a one-way rambling lecture). 

4. The realtor wasn’t organized when he started the video.

Video best practices

1. Determine when video is the best medium to use. Do you want to share something visual? Do you want to walk through the numbers? Do you and the recipient need to get on the same page? Don’t use video just to look cool.

2. Keep it concise. Play out what you’re going to say before recording. Have bullet points or an outline at the ready. 

3. BLUF. Get to the point quickly (within the first 45 seconds). In the military they call it: “Bottom Line Up Front.” Then say: “The rest of this video is only if you want further details.”  

4. Have visual aids ready.

5. Include a text summary of the video’s key points when you send clients or team members a link to the video. Don’t just send an email saying: “here’s a video for you.”

6. Offer to have a follow-up conversation to answer any questions they may have.

Don’t let the pitfalls described above discourage you from using video. It’s a powerful and compelling medium for communicating with your clients and your team. Just make sure you’re using it the right way. How are you using video at your firm? I’d love to hear from you. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending