Connect with us

Accounting

Biden moves to curb cooking oil imports with green fuel rule for tax credit

Published

on

The U.S. is moving to curb imports of used cooking oil, preventing foreign supplies used to make biofuels from qualifying for a lucrative tax credit.

In long-awaited guidance, the U.S. Treasury signaled that fuels made with foreign-sourced supplies won’t be allowed under the so-called GREET model, a Department of Energy tool used to determine the full sweep of greenhouse gases emitted from the transportation and energy industries. 

The move comes after a flood of supplies from China reached U.S. shores at cheaper prices than soybean oil produced locally. The decision is a win for American farmers, who have been counting on a boom in soy-heavy biofuels like renewable diesel to sell their crops.

Soybean oil futures for March jumped by the exchange limit in Chicago on Friday, surging 7%, the most since June 2023. 

Shares of Bunge Global SA, the world’s biggest oilseed processor, gained 5%. The joint owners of Diamond Green Diesel, North America’s biggest renewable-diesel maker, jumped, with Darling Ingredients Inc. surging as much as 10% and Valero Energy Corp. climbing as much as 4%. 

“This tax credit is essential to U.S. competitiveness and to reduce emissions in the transportation sector with more affordable, cleaner fuel,” U.S. Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk said in a statement. “The final guidance released today provides clarity and certainty to America’s world-leading biofuel industry.” 

The tax incentive that took effect on Jan. 1 is part of President Joe Biden’s signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act. While the guidance gives Donald Trump — a supporter of fossil fuels —something to work from, it’s unclear how far he will take his pledge to roll back the IRA.

U.S. biofuels and corn groups criticized the overall guidance as lacking details on what qualifies for tax credits. 

Geoff Cooper, chief executive officer of ethanol trade group Renewable Fuels Association, said it fell short of expectations and doesn’t give producers of corn-based U.S. ethanol the certainty they seek. Emily Skor, CEO of ethanol lobbying group Growth Energy, said the guidance “still lacks the critical details that are needed to help ensure that American biofuel producers and their farm partners can lead the world in clean fuel production.”

The National Corn Growers Association said more clarity is needed about the specific environmental practices that will be required for accessing the credit. “What a missed opportunity for growers,” said President Kenneth Hartman Jr., an Illinois farmer. 

Ethanol is among the ingredients that can be used in making green jet fuel. The $54 billion industry is counting on new markets like sustainable aviation fuel, or SAF, to boost demand at a time when the rise of electric vehicles poses an existential threat to liquid fuels, especially those used to power light-duty automobiles. 

The issue of foreign used cooking oil has been a growing concern of agriculture groups and lawmakers over the past year. Growers bristled as they saw soybean prices plunge as UCO from Asia flowed into the country for making fuels like renewable diesel and SAF. Fuel made with UCO is highly valued in low-carbon fuel markets like California because of its relatively small carbon footprint. 

Adding to the outcry was suspicion that China shippers were adding fresh palm oil to UCO, making it fraudulent under U.S. renewable fuel law. Palm, the world’s most widely used vegetable oil, is a bane to environmentalists and many countries because the industry is a key driver of deforestation in places like Indonesia and has been tied to labor abuses. 

The Treasury rules issued on Friday allow fuels made with UCO from the U.S. to qualify for the 45Z credit, which provides a per-gallon, or gallon-equivalent, tax credit for makers of so-called clean transportation fuels based on the carbon intensity of production.  

Under a rival model, the globally accepted Corsia standard established by the United Nations’ governing body for aviation, green jet fuel made with foreign feedstocks would have access to the credit.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending