Connect with us

Accounting

Big changes expected at SEC under new chair Paul Atkins

Published

on

The nominee for the next chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins, is likely to pursue a more deregulatory approach than the current SEC chair, Gary Gensler, according to SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda.

Speaking Monday at the AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, Uyeda discussed Atkins after President-elect Trump announced his intention last week to nominate Atkins. As one of the Republican members of the Commission, he is favorably disposed to Atkins and worked for him at one time.

“This will be my fourth transition that we’ve had in administrations,” Uyeda said. “I was really excited about the President’s announcement last week of his intent to nominate Paul Atkins as our next chairman of the commission. I’m fortunate to have known Paul going back to when I was a state securities regulator out in California and he was SEC commissioner. Out of that one meeting, it was enough for where Paul was kind enough to offer me a job, and that’s what brought me from Sacramento to Washington in 2006, where I joined his staff.”

uyeda-mark-sec.png

SEC commissioner Mark Uyeda, speaking at the AICPA & CIMA Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments

Gensler has announced he will be stepping down on January 20, the day of Trump’s inauguration. Uyeda expects there to be an acting commissioner for a period of time before Atkins is conformed as chair. He would like to see Atkins to put less reliance on staff guidance like Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which expresses the views of the SEC staff regarding the accounting for obligations to safeguard crypto-assets an entity holds for platform users. Uyeda would like to see SAB 121 repealed by Atkins or the acting commissioner.

“We’ve had a lot of activity in the last several years now not only at the SEC but at the PCAOB,” said Uyeda. “Some of it has been staff driven. Some of it has been by the commission. Take SAB 121, which has gotten a huge amount of criticism. My biggest concern about when you do things through a Staff Accounting Bulletin is there’s no notice and comment process. It just gets issued. There is no Commission vote on it either. It is a statement of the staff. I think one of the things that needs to occur is, given the huge impact that SAB 121 has had is that needs to be withdrawn and then replaced instead with a more thoughtful process. Perhaps it goes over to FASB to do what they do so well, which is to have the consultation and say, ‘Look, are we thinking through this, right? What is our basis for this? What are the trade-offs? Let’s collect more data and evidence as to how investors would view these disclosures.'”

Uyeda also objected to the the 1% materiality threshold under the SEC’s proposed climate-related disclosure rule, which is currently on hold.

He was asked by Dennis McGowan, vice president of professional practice at the Center for Audit Quality, about his expectations for the Commission under Atkins’ leadership.

“First is a return to capital formation,” said Uyeda. “That is one of the core pillars of our mission, how we facilitate capital formation, and we have made it much more burdensome to be a public company with very little scaling between the large cap issuers and the smaller reporting companies. We want an environment where going public is a viable option, because if you don’t have the opportunity to go public, well, why would someone want to invest in the first place? And even with some of the IPOs today, I get more concerned that it’s not viewed as a true capital-raising opportunity, but rather more of a liquidity event for the early stage venture capital and insiders.”

He also hopes to see a more friendly stance toward cryptocurrency. “We have been essentially sending crypto policy through enforcement the last four years,” said Uyeda. “There are a number of things that we can be doing in this area, not only on the accounting side, but with the disclosures that are required, how you think about this in the context of custody, with respect to auditing crypto reserves. There is so much we can be doing in these areas which I would expect the SEC to try to put renewed focus on.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending