Connect with us

Accounting

Big wins for business in Trump tax bill

Published

on

trump-signing-one-big-beautiful-bill.jpg
President Donald Trump displays the signed bill during a ceremony for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg

President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act has plenty for businesses and business owners to like, according to experts from Top 100 Firm Bennett Thrasher.

“First, we can all take a deep breath on what was otherwise looming as a huge overall tax increase,” said Tim Watt, a partner in the tax department. “Then you look at the law itself, and it largely adds more permanency and predictability to the pre-existing law, with some enhancements. So it’s a little bit of a ‘back to normal,’ if that term exists in federal tax practice. But, taking that a step further, it does reinforce the concept of really ‘knowing your client,’ and tailoring our advice, whether that be an advance tax strategy or some sustainable advantageous tax position on a multiyear long-term basis, or coming black to the tried-and-true fundamentals — the basic blocking and tackling.” 

For starters, there are the “big four,” according to Watt: “100% bonus depreciation, the Section 174 research and experimental costs treatment, and Section 163(j) limitation on business interest expense, and then the Section 199A deduction for pass-through businesses — those are the movers that we would immediately focus on, and the interaction on these with our client’s situation on reducing their tax bills.”

Nina Desai, a partner in the credits & incentives practice at BT, observed that many of her clients are in technology and are actively developing new products, so they have been waiting for the Section 174 fix. “They’re excited that they are finally able to fully deduct their domestic R&D expenses, beginning in 2025,” she said. “A lot of taxpayers are appreciative that they can go back to having that immediate deduction — it’s a big win.”

“And now we have relief on the Section 163(j) business interest expense deduction limitation,” she added. “For heavily leveraged and capital intensive businesses that are not in real estate, farming or car dealer businesses, they now have a better income tax posture with respect to their debt service obligations. So this may also alleviate access to debt capital markets that were maybe undoable prior to this. Some businesses have gone through extensive planning in trying to mitigate this. Now some of that pressure is off.”

“We now see the Section 199A deduction every day, which is not here to stay and acts as an effective rate reduction for pass-through taxation business owners,” according to Watt. “This brings what would otherwise be their top rate of 37% down to 29.6 % on qualified business income.”

“In the original versions of the bill, it was kicking the can down the road for a few years,” observed Desai. “But at least there is permanency here, so clients can start planning for this and modeling out some of the provisions.”

“Some of the other provisions that stand out, at least to us and our client base, is the 122 stock gain exclusion, which is now enhanced and expanded,” said Watt. “The gain exclusion limit is now increased to $15 million as opposed to the $10 million that it was. And they also introduced a new kind of tiered exclusion structure based on shorter stock holding periods, instead of just the prior kind of hard-and-fast five-year holding period. At the same time, kind of a key to the qualified small business qualification is they increased the gross asset threshold, which enables more businesses to fall under the potential gain exclusion, so this heavily favors U.S. technology startups. It’s another big win for that industry, and our clients are looking to invest in that space.”

Another issue that is overlooked quite a bit is the excess business loss limitation, according to Watt. 

“It was temporary, but now it’s permanent,” he noted. “It’s one of the loss limitation provisions that apply to pass-through taxation that is imposed on non-corporate taxpayers. So it’s a little bit of a ‘gotcha’ with respect to trying to implement a large tax loss strategy. Anyone on social media as much as my family is knows that every Joe in the United States has some sort of a tax strategy to peddle. This is one we often have to tell our clients that this is not going to work because of the excess business loss limitation, or some other provisions. It gets overlooked quite a bit, and so we continue to amplify that there is a limitation when you look at a strategy, but at the same time there are ways to plan around it. “

Watt also noted that the preservation of the partnership carried interest treatment that protects the key structure advantage and enables the continued use of long-term capital gains for private company owners and private equity profits interests is important to Bennett Thrasher’s customer base.

Although the discussion has been focused on the business impacts, to the extent that individuals own businesses or have interests in pass-through entities or C corporations, the permanent increase in the estate tax exemption is relevant, according to Ben Bowers, senior manager in Bennett Thrasher’s tax practice. 

“If their business holdings put them close to the $15 million exemption amount, it’s important that you know the amount is permanent, not just having a temporary increase that is set to sunset in five or 10 years,” he said. “This is permanent, at least until it’s changed by a future Congress. That helps with succession planning, if they want to hand the business off to their kids or put it into a trust. Also, the increase from $10,000 to $40,000 of deductible state and local taxes is relevant for a lot of pass-through entity owners. They can potentially deduct a greater share of their state income taxes if they’re below the income threshold of $600,000. An earlier version of the bill had discussed removing or limiting the use of the pass-through entity tax regimes, but the final version of the bill did not include that. The fact that this is still available is also a benefit for a lot of flow-through business owners.”

With the depleted levels of workers at the Internal Revenue Service, the question arises as to whether this will result in a lesser volume of exams or an increased volume of erroneous notices, observed Watt: “There [are people] out there that will use this as an opportunity to be more aggressive,” he said. “We have to be vigilant in protecting our clients and in trying to fight off the new TikTok tax strategies. To a certain degree, it makes us look good because we get an opportunity to say, ‘That won’t work, and here’s why.’ We always welcome these opportunities to find solutions and meet our clients’ needs.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending