Connect with us

Accounting

Black Friday stress-tests sales tax solutions\

Published

on

Black Friday shopping at Best Buy in 2024
A Best Buy store on Black Friday in California

David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

While shoppers that took Black Friday seriously now have an opportunity to rest from their efforts before venturing back out to the malls, tax professionals who are responsible for businesses’ sales taxes may find it hard to keep up with the demands of the holiday season. 

“The complexity during Black Friday, Small Business Saturday, and Cyber Monday into the holiday season is due to the serious uptick in transactions that happen during the holiday time,” said Charles Maniace, vice president of regulatory analysis & design at indirect tax software solution provider Sovos. “The way I always view it is that it’s kind of a crucible in which a retailer’s tax systems and processes are put to their maximum test if there is a weakness. If there’s a weakness or vulnerability, it’s going to be revealed and become a problem during the holiday.”

“For example, let’s say your organization doesn’t apply a solution that’s particularly on top of rate and rule and requirement changes,” he continued. “It’s during this time where you’ll be processing for some companies that process the majority of their sales during the holiday. So if you’re going to get taxed wrong because you don’t know that a rate or a rule has changed in a given jurisdiction, the effect of not having the right answer will more robustly be manifest when you’re making your most sales. Of course, this creates potentially a customer service problem: The last thing you need during the holiday season is people flooding your customer support line with questions about why you’re applying incorrect sales tax. It’s a customer service disaster. And it creates the greatest audit exposure because that’s where the highest volume is.” 

“People are buying a large volume of goods at this time, and if a retailer is applying the wrong tax rate, it’s a recipe for a future audit liability that’s going to sit on your books for a couple of years until the auditors come knocking and then it will reveal itself in a very painful way,” said Maniace. “The other issue is scalability and whether your solution can handle the increased volume. If you have an automated solution, is that solution capable of supporting you in your most challenging time? Can it handle the increased volume without doing something incorrect or inaccurate?”

There is also a potential issue with the interplay with economic nexus, according to Maniace. 

“There’s still a whole bunch of states, including California, that say your obligation to collect and remit sales tax occurs during the next transaction after you cross an economic nexus threshold,” he explained. “For smaller sellers, it means that if they experience a holiday spike, if they cross the threshold during the holiday, then they become obligated to collect and remit sales and use tax on the next sale. So let’s say a state has a $100,000-in-gross-sales threshold, and they cross that threshold after Black Friday but before Cyber Monday. Technically they have an obligation to collect and remit a tax on Cyber Monday.”

The only way a company can turn around on a dime and go from being not compliant to being compliant is by having a solution in place that allows you to effectively turn on your compliance with the flip of a switch or a phone call, Maniace observed. 

“You have to be able to work with your provider on an immediate basis, flip a couple of switches in your solution, and start collecting and remitting on a timely manner,” he said. “This is where technology providers prove their mettle — are they truly up all of the time, and will that uptime persist when all of their clients are pinging the system for transactions that are happening in real time.”

Retail delivery fees: The next big trend?

Colorado introduced a retail delivery fee several years ago, and Minnesota followed with their own version in July 2024. Maniace foresees other states developing their such a fee in coming years, with each one differing from the other. 

“It’s a 50 cent fee applied to orders over $100 that include either a taxable item or non-taxable clothing,” he explained. “There’s a mechanism in Minnesota law that allows a seller to either pass this on to their customer directly as a charge on their invoice or absorb the cost. A seller may choose to absorb that cost and that may work for them for a period of a few months, but when they do that it comes out of their bottom line. Unless they’re overtly raising their costs to account for something like the retail delivery fee, it’s coming out of their profits. It’s a relatively recent law change and if you haven’t adopted it or accounted for it on an automated basis, it’s going to really cut into your profits come this Christmas.”

“A number of other states have expressed interest in it,” he noted. “Washington commissioned a study on it, and Nebraska considered it in their last special session, but ultimately chose not to adopt it. I suspect that this coming legislative session, and future ones, we could see a number of other states adopting something like the retail delivery fee. When you pyramid one on top of another, with each one working differently, you’re adding a great deal of complexity.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending