Connect with us

Accounting

BlackRock’s GIP joins Exxon in backing new CO2 accounting model

Published

on

A group of firms including BlackRock Inc.’s Global Infrastructure Partners, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Banco Santander SA have joined forces to push for a new way to measure the carbon emissions of the products they make, buy and finance.

The coalition, which also lists chemicals giant BASF SE and consultancy EY as backers, will develop a framework that eliminates double-counting of carbon pollution and attributes emissions to their sources, according to Amy Brachio, the chief executive of the newly formed group, Carbon Measures. Brachio, who used to be global vice chair for sustainability at EY, said a separate goal is to design new standards to measure the carbon intensity of specific products.

The initiative feeds into an area of climate finance that is frequently controversial but set to become more consequential, as regulations such as Europe’s carbon border adjustment mechanism kick in. That’s raising pressure on companies and their investors to address their carbon footprints.

The Carbon Measures initiative represents a meaningful departure from existing standards, which were developed in the late 1990s. Critics of the current system say it allows multiple actors to count the same CO2 molecules, leading to inaccurate estimates of overall emissions. Proponents counter that the issue of double counting is a feature rather than a glitch, because it raises the likelihood that multiple actors will reduce their emissions. 

Carbon-accounting experts have expressed concern that an approach like the one targeted by Carbon Measures could become another delaying tactic, due to the practical difficulties entailed in building a global solution.

Brachio says the Carbon Measures framework will lay the groundwork for calculating the carbon intensity of individual products, a move that will allow investors to reward low-carbon production.

For example, “If you are buying a ton of steel, you need to understand how much carbon went into producing that ton of steel, so that when it’s sold you’re not only selling the asset of the steel, but you’re selling the liability — so to speak — of the carbon emissions that go along with it,” she said in an interview.

The Carbon Measures Model

Carbon Measures will support the development of a ledger-based framework that is similar to what exists in traditional financial accounting. The idea is to track emissions as products move through supply chains, just as financial ledgers plot costs and revenues through business transactions.

Brachio said the expectation is that Carbon Measures will grow from roughly 20 backers today to about 100 over time, with an emphasis on attracting high-carbon industries.

The model is expected to take two years to develop and between five and seven years to be used at scale.

Carbon Measures also intends to help design carbon intensity standards for key industrial products that account for the majority of global emissions, such as electricity, fuel, steel, concrete and chemicals. 

And it will call for new policies that support emissions reductions and advocate for carbon intensity standards for key industries that governments could then use to set policies for corporates, Brachio said.

Carbon Measures’ initial backers include representatives of industry, such as Linde Plc and Mitsui & Co., as well as financial actors. BlackRock’s GIP, which declined to comment for this article, says on its website that it views the clean-energy transition as the “single biggest investment opportunity.” GIP also says it wants to use its relationships with businesses and governments to help drive decarbonization.

Ana Botin, executive chair of Santander, said in a statement made available on Monday that the accurate and transparent calculation of carbon emissions “is the foundation for meaningful climate action.” Francois Jackow, CEO of Air Liquide — another backer of Carbon Measures — said harmonized product-level carbon intensity standards will enable investors “to reward low-carbon solutions.”

Other founding members of Carbon Measures include Brazilian mining giant Vale SA, Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Bayer AG of Germany and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. U.S. corporations to join up include Honeywell International Inc., steel maker Nucor Corp. and clean energy company NextEra Energy.

The first step to reducing global emissions “is to know where they’re coming from—and today, we don’t have an accurate system to do this,” said Exxon CEO Darren Woods. The oil major has been advocating for a global system for measuring the carbon intensity of different products for several years.

Today the de-facto global accounting standard for measuring a company’s emissions is the GHG Protocol, with the vast majority of companies in the S&P 500 Index reporting emissions using its framework. Detractors of the protocol, including Exxon and some academics, say that it not only allows double-counting, but that it also can’t produce emissions data that’s consistently comparable across firms and supply chains.

Those responsible for its design, meanwhile, say double-counting is one of the framework’s “greatest strengths” because it encourages “comprehensive” greenhouse gas management.

Brachio says “precise and comparable data has proven something of a holy grail” in emissions tracking. But the current approach “simply won’t be sufficient going forward.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending