Connect with us

Accounting

BlackRock’s GIP joins Exxon in backing new CO2 accounting model

Published

on

A group of firms including BlackRock Inc.’s Global Infrastructure Partners, Exxon Mobil Corp. and Banco Santander SA have joined forces to push for a new way to measure the carbon emissions of the products they make, buy and finance.

The coalition, which also lists chemicals giant BASF SE and consultancy EY as backers, will develop a framework that eliminates double-counting of carbon pollution and attributes emissions to their sources, according to Amy Brachio, the chief executive of the newly formed group, Carbon Measures. Brachio, who used to be global vice chair for sustainability at EY, said a separate goal is to design new standards to measure the carbon intensity of specific products.

The initiative feeds into an area of climate finance that is frequently controversial but set to become more consequential, as regulations such as Europe’s carbon border adjustment mechanism kick in. That’s raising pressure on companies and their investors to address their carbon footprints.

The Carbon Measures initiative represents a meaningful departure from existing standards, which were developed in the late 1990s. Critics of the current system say it allows multiple actors to count the same CO2 molecules, leading to inaccurate estimates of overall emissions. Proponents counter that the issue of double counting is a feature rather than a glitch, because it raises the likelihood that multiple actors will reduce their emissions. 

Carbon-accounting experts have expressed concern that an approach like the one targeted by Carbon Measures could become another delaying tactic, due to the practical difficulties entailed in building a global solution.

Brachio says the Carbon Measures framework will lay the groundwork for calculating the carbon intensity of individual products, a move that will allow investors to reward low-carbon production.

For example, “If you are buying a ton of steel, you need to understand how much carbon went into producing that ton of steel, so that when it’s sold you’re not only selling the asset of the steel, but you’re selling the liability — so to speak — of the carbon emissions that go along with it,” she said in an interview.

The Carbon Measures Model

Carbon Measures will support the development of a ledger-based framework that is similar to what exists in traditional financial accounting. The idea is to track emissions as products move through supply chains, just as financial ledgers plot costs and revenues through business transactions.

Brachio said the expectation is that Carbon Measures will grow from roughly 20 backers today to about 100 over time, with an emphasis on attracting high-carbon industries.

The model is expected to take two years to develop and between five and seven years to be used at scale.

Carbon Measures also intends to help design carbon intensity standards for key industrial products that account for the majority of global emissions, such as electricity, fuel, steel, concrete and chemicals. 

And it will call for new policies that support emissions reductions and advocate for carbon intensity standards for key industries that governments could then use to set policies for corporates, Brachio said.

Carbon Measures’ initial backers include representatives of industry, such as Linde Plc and Mitsui & Co., as well as financial actors. BlackRock’s GIP, which declined to comment for this article, says on its website that it views the clean-energy transition as the “single biggest investment opportunity.” GIP also says it wants to use its relationships with businesses and governments to help drive decarbonization.

Ana Botin, executive chair of Santander, said in a statement made available on Monday that the accurate and transparent calculation of carbon emissions “is the foundation for meaningful climate action.” Francois Jackow, CEO of Air Liquide — another backer of Carbon Measures — said harmonized product-level carbon intensity standards will enable investors “to reward low-carbon solutions.”

Other founding members of Carbon Measures include Brazilian mining giant Vale SA, Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Bayer AG of Germany and Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. U.S. corporations to join up include Honeywell International Inc., steel maker Nucor Corp. and clean energy company NextEra Energy.

The first step to reducing global emissions “is to know where they’re coming from—and today, we don’t have an accurate system to do this,” said Exxon CEO Darren Woods. The oil major has been advocating for a global system for measuring the carbon intensity of different products for several years.

Today the de-facto global accounting standard for measuring a company’s emissions is the GHG Protocol, with the vast majority of companies in the S&P 500 Index reporting emissions using its framework. Detractors of the protocol, including Exxon and some academics, say that it not only allows double-counting, but that it also can’t produce emissions data that’s consistently comparable across firms and supply chains.

Those responsible for its design, meanwhile, say double-counting is one of the framework’s “greatest strengths” because it encourages “comprehensive” greenhouse gas management.

Brachio says “precise and comparable data has proven something of a holy grail” in emissions tracking. But the current approach “simply won’t be sufficient going forward.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending