Connect with us

Accounting

Builder.ai ex-CFO subpoenaed in US for auditor communications

Published

on

U.S. investigators are advancing a criminal probe into Builder.ai, demanding a former executive’s communications with the firm’s U.K. auditor and with others involved in the financial reporting for the artificial intelligence startup ahead of its June bankruptcy.

Federal Bureau of Investigation officers served former Builder.ai Chief Financial Officer Andres Elizondo at a Dallas area airport in August with a subpoena, said people familiar with the matter, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public. Prosecutors sought information related to alleged violations of laws relating to wire fraud, securities fraud and conspiracy, according to the subpoena reviewed by Bloomberg, without naming the exact target of the probe. The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan has been looking into Builder.ai’s financial practices and previously demanded the company turn over documents, Bloomberg News reported in May. 

Investigators ordered Elizondo to turn over communications with investors, creditors and other accounting firms that did business with the company, according to the subpoena. They specifically asked for his exchanges with Builder.ai founder Sachin Dev Duggal and Paul Goldwin, a partner at accounting firm PKF Littlejohn who had signed off on a Builder.ai affiliate’s U.K. accounts.

The specific demands from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, which haven’t been previously reported, signal the investigation of the startup once valued at $1.5 billion is moving forward. Builder.ai collapsed after investors learned it had vastly inflated sales, leading to the biggest bankruptcy of an AI company since the start of the ChatGPT era. Its implosion has served as a cautionary tale for investors pouring vast sums into the technology.

The prosecutors asked for all communications and documents related to “Builder.ai/Engineer.ai” and defined that entity as all corporate affiliates and subsidiaries, including Engineer.ai Global Limited, which is the U.K. entity that Goldwin audited. Builder.ai was founded under the name Engineer.ai, and the original name is still used with some corporate affiliates.

In a statement, PKF Littlejohn said it and Goldwin did not provide any services to Builder.ai, which it described as “the US entity within the group that is under scrutiny.”

“We acted solely as auditors of Engineer.ai Global Limited, the U.K. entity,” a spokesman for the firm said in a statement. “We have not received a subpoena and have no visibility regarding its contents. We will review any requests for information in line with our professional obligations.”

An attorney for PKF Littlejohn added that their understanding is that the firm and Goldwin are not under investigation themselves. Elizondo, who received the subpoena, is not a suspect or target of the investigation either, a person familiar with his situation said, asking not to be identified discussing private matters.

Prosecutors also broadly requested communications with “current, former, or potential accounting firms,” the subpoena reviewed by Bloomberg shows. While it identifies 10 accounting firms by name, Builder.ai founder Duggal and PKF Littlejohn’s Goldwin are the only two individuals specifically named. Communications with them are the first two requests made in the subpoena issued to Elizondo. 

Prosecutors haven’t said that they’re charging anyone in connection with the London-based company’s collapse, and it’s unclear whether anyone will be.

Elizondo’s lawyer, Adam Katz, declined to comment on the subpoena. A spokesperson for Duggal didn’t provide comment, and a spokesperson for Builder.ai didn’t respond to a request for comment. The FBI and the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s Office also didn’t provide comment. 

Builder.ai pitched software that would utilize AI to help users create apps with minimal coding experience. A flood of venture capital money and backing from Microsoft Corp. propelled the company to a $1.5 billion valuation in 2023, making it one of the U.K.’s biggest AI startups. Duggal became a fixture of the technology conference circuit. 

But behind the scenes, the company was using a web of complex transactions to exaggerate revenue, Bloomberg reported previously, citing documents. Builder.ai’s audit committee found it had inflated 2024 sales by nearly 300%, leading creditors to seize most of its available funds and force it into bankruptcy. 

In recent months, U.S. investigators gained extensive access to the company’s digital records, the people familiar with the situation said. Additional information demands were sent to some of Builder.ai’s investors, including the Qatar Investment Authority, one of the people said. 

A spokesperson for QIA declined to comment. 

Goldwin has a lengthy history with Duggal. Before founding Engineer.ai in 2016, Duggal was the chief executive officer of SMX Corp., a U.K. firm that resold computer hardware and software. Goldwin became a director at SMX in 2010 and signed off on its financial statements in that capacity for several years, according to U.K. corporate filings. 

He moved to PKF Littlejohn, a London accounting firm, in 2013 and remained an SMX director for another four years. 

“Mr. Goldwin became a U.K. director only in order to oversee that the accounts were filed on time,” PKF Littlejohn said of his time at SMX in the statement. “Mr. Goldwin did not know Mr. Duggal in a personal capacity.” The firm said Goldwin resigned as an SMX director in January 2017 and that “no auditing services were ever provided.”

Goldwin signed off on Builder.ai’s U.K. accounts as its senior statutory auditor for annual accounts from 2020 to 2023. Its last full-year accounts were filed Aug. 15, 2024, for the year ending March 31, 2023. 

While small companies often turn to familiar auditors, relying on one that sat on the same board as the CEO could be a red flag to prosecutors, according to Simon Osborne, an executive fellow at the London Business School who focuses on corporate governance. “It doesn’t look good,” he said. “It’s always a question of facts and degree.”

There was no trading relationship between SMX and Engineer.ai, according to PKF Littlejohn. “Mr. Goldwin made no management decisions in relation to SMX,” it said in the statement.

The Financial Times earlier reported that Elizondo received a subpoena and, in March, reported on connections between Duggal and Goldwin and other auditors. 

The U.S. Attorney’s subpoena of Elizondo ordered him to appear before a grand jury on Sept. 9 in New York, according to the document reviewed by Bloomberg. But the requirement for him to appear was waived, and he is voluntarily cooperating with the investigation, the person familiar with his situation said.

Elizondo served as CFO from 2021 until 2023. The company didn’t find a replacement for the position before going bankrupt.

Prosecutors and the FBI spoke with at least one other former Builder.ai staffer earlier this year, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the information isn’t public. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending