Connect with us

Accounting

Buy-sell agreements in focus for business owners

Published

on

Business owner clients seeking to use the shrinking estate-tax window to pass down closely held shares may need to think through new or updated buy-sell agreements.

The potential expiration of many provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 at the end of next year means that the minimum size of an estate subject to taxes of up to 40% at death could drop down by a half from their current levels of $13.61 million for individuals and $27.22 million for joint filers. Financial advisors, tax professionals and their clients are therefore considering a lot of estate-planning strategies that include trusts or life insurance policies.

For business owners trying to remove some assets from their estates while ensuring an orderly succession in the event of death, disability, retirement, divorces or other challenges, the buy-sell agreements are “not a direct correlation” to the possible expiration but an important factor ahead of the sunset date, said Dawn Jinsky, a certified financial planner and certified public accountant who is the leader of estate and business transition planning with Southfield, Michigan-based registered investment advisory firm Plante Moran Wealth Management

Those discussions are also coming after a Supreme Court decision this past summer added more valuation questions about the impact of any life insurance proceeds to closely held shares that are part of an estate, she noted.

“Many people are choosing to gift closely held stock because of the decreasing exemptions, and if you are doing that, you also need to look at a buy-sell agreement,” Jinsky said in an interview. “It’s become an ancillary discussion that has to happen.”

READ MORE: 3 types of trusts that could help wealthy clients’ estate plans

With taxes that can “add up quickly” for larger estates and any number of scenarios that may leave the business in the hands of the wrong people in the eyes of one or more current owners, the agreements represent another area in which “failing to plan is planning to fail,” she added.

In general, the business owners must choose between three kinds of buy-sell agreements: an entity-purchase agreement setting up the business itself to buy a deceased partner’s stock; a cross-purchase deal that provides for the other holders to pick up the holdings; or a hybrid one that gives the business the first right of refusal, according to Jinsky. The Supreme Court decision in Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service brought more concerns around potential taxes on life insurance proceeds in the first and third options among businesses such as many RIAs themselves and a great number of their clients, experts have noted.

“While the Court admitted that the dispute in the Connelly case is narrow, with its result ‘a consequence of how the Connelly brothers chose to structure their agreement,’ the decision may have far-reaching implications for closely held businesses,” Levenfeld Pearlstein attorneys Suzanne Shier and Robert Garner wrote in a blog on the firm’s website last month. “If your company has a redemption agreement funded by life insurance at the company level, it is essential to understand the implications of those agreements from an estate tax perspective.”

Describing those kinds of scenarios or posing the concern of what may happen if, say, one partner in the business goes through a divorce or one of the children of an owner dies, can help advisors and tax professionals convince clients to start the conversation about a buy-sell agreement. 

Those documents enable the businesses to establish “all the parameters” for any unforeseen events, with the method for valuation looming as “one of the most critical of those decisions,” Jinsky said. So-called tagalong rights provide certainty that heirs will get “some kind of true fair-market value” for their holdings and avoid scrutiny by the IRS or any state authorities noticing a disparity between the sales price of a business and the size of their estate, she noted. The agreements spell out the process and formula for those valuations.

Otherwise, the owners may run into a situation in which “‘my business partner and her family owe a huge estate tax liability but didn’t get the corresponding proceeds,'” Jinsky said.

READ MORE: How a life insurance strategy could save some wealthy estates millions

Clients can work out any other issues that could come up through crafting the buy-sell agreement as well, she added.

“Death, disability and retirement are the three key ones that you establish, but then there are some other ones that can be put into the buy-sell agreement,” she said. “A buy-sell can be as complicated or simplified as the situation warrants. If you’ve seen one buy-sell, you’ve seen one buy-sell. It really varies based on who are the owners and what are they looking to accomplish.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending