Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Private equity’s growing presence in the accounting landscape has given rise to a substantial inflow of capital opportunities, empowering firms seeking to expand into new markets or deepen their presence in existing ones. Despite all the up-front benefits of non-bank lending, accountants can’t help but wonder about the true cost of going down this road.
Firms like Top 25 Firm Armanino LLP and Top 50 Firm Cohen & Co. have recently joined the ranks of the many who have taken on PE investments since 2021, when the deal between Top 25 Firm EisnerAmper LLP and PE firm TowerBrook Capital Partners set the stage for other investments to follow suit. While the idea of such a deal had been mulled over for several years beforehand, the investment in EisnerAmper is generally understood to be the first of its kind to come to fruition.
Philip Whitman, CPA and CEO of advisory firm Whitman Transition Advisors LLC, said PE activity has only grown since that first investment, with 2024 being the year that investors have become more eager to invest in or partner with CPA firms.
“To date, our team has met with over 150 private-equity groups that have a desire to find foundational firms in the accounting/CPA firm arena. … Not a week goes by that I am not hearing a pitch or new thesis by at least three or four private-equity groups that are considering entering the accounting-firm space,” Whitman said.
While the money itself is a welcome addition for firms of various sizes, the conditions it could bring are less so — independence being the first such condition that could change following PE investments.
1/2
Examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
2/2
More examples of various deals between CPA firms and private equity investors broken down by transformation type. (Allan Koltin)
Firms that provide attest services must be majority-owned by licensed CPAs, but still allow for a minority stake to be owned by non-CPA entities. New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed a non-CPA ownership bill into law late last year, making New York the most recent state to allow “public accounting firms with minority ownership by individuals who are not CPAs to incorporate in New York State,” according to a press release.
As is often the case, PE transactions will result in a firm being divided into two entities, one owned by CPAs to oversee attest services, and the other wholly or part-owned by non-CPA private-equity partners that provide non-attest services such as tax, technology or consulting services.
Experts stress the importance of a clear distinction between which parts of a firm are owned by CPAs and which are not, both from a legal standpoint and a client relationship perspective.
“My understanding is that the PE firms have a bit of a workaround, with those employees and transferring income, but I feel that could be a very fine line or walking on thin ice,” said Stephen Mankowski, owner of the Pennsylvania-based accounting firm Mankowski Associates CPA. “Firms need to be independent both in fact and appearance. … The PE firms cannot have a relationship with any clients of the CPA firm.”
Even with those divisions, PE groups “putting tens or hundreds of millions of dollars into an organization will want a say” in how the broader organization is run, said Mark Masson, managing partner and head of the professional services at the Chicago-based Lotis Blue Consulting.
“It may look collaborative at first, but what does it look like six to 18 months in when you hit a bumpy patch?” Masson said.
Firms that can navigate those dilemmas gain access to a pool of investors hungry to dive into the world of accounting, promising vast funding for M&A strategies, technology investments, and.
“PE has raised the ‘performance bar’ for CPA firms by moving them from a ‘country club’ culture to a ‘country’ culture. … Specifically, they have instilled a culture of greater accountability (less autonomy) and hence a higher-performing firm over the ‘hold’ period,” said Allan Koltin, CPA and CEO of Koltin Consulting Group.
Read on to learn more about the growing presence of PE in the accounting profession, and how experts are keeping a close eye on the promises and pitfalls of new investment activity.
Allan Koltin at the 2024 PE Summit
The unequal impact of private equity in accounting
The influence of private equity and the much-needed capital it brings has been steadily growing across the accounting profession over the last few years. But seasoned professionals say that while it works for some, it’s not a cure-all.
“Private equity is not a silver bullet,” Allan Koltin of the Koltin Consulting Group told attendees at Accounting Today’s inaugural PE Summit, held in late November. “If you don’t do PE, that doesn’t mean you won’t be successful. But you do need to figure out what you’re going to do” to solve the issues of access to capital and resources that PE deals help with.
The values of PE are seemingly only an option for the higher-earning firms, Koltin explained, as the scrutiny of PE firms where earnings reviews are concerned is a high bar to clear.
“It seems like a lot of deals have happened, but believe me, the same number or more have died,” Koltin explained.
The private equity changeup in accounting career pathing
Private-equity investments, outside the obvious capital benefits, are repathing traditional career tracks across the accounting profession, according to a recent report.
The Accounting MOVE Project says PE is “challenging long-established firm structures” and “raising significant questions about the future of ownership models and their impact on career development,” according to a report it recently published. The report was co-sponsored by the Accounting & Financial Women’s Alliance and Top 100 Firm Moss Adams.
Career pathing has been a particular point of contention for many firms seeking to enlist fresh talent amid a growing shortage of new graduates. The report goes on to explain how PE buyers use structured opportunities for advancement within firms to incentivize retention.
Allan Koltin (middle) at the 2024 AICPA Executive Roundtable
Private equity is the beginning of a new era. Is it a good one?
Accounting has undergone numerous changes over the last four years, as private-equity firms have continued to grow in scale and number throughout the profession. Experts like Matthew Marinaro, a principal at PE firm Red Iron Group, say if this trend were likened to a baseball game, “We’re in the second or third inning.”
These partnerships have become prevalent in various forms, according to Allan Koltin, speaking at the AICPA Executive Roundtable in New York in September.
Models include instances of PE firms acquiring a piece of a Top 25 Firm to then provide capital for buying up smaller Top 500 firms, as well as more broad purchases of Top 30 to Top 100 accounting firms by middle-weight PE players.
Those at the heart of the growing trend of M&A in accounting say recurring revenue is an important factor in any private-equity deal, but it’s revenue quality over quantity that will win out in the end.
While speaking at the Scaling New Heights conference in Orlando, Florida, this year, Slivka explained that his “holistic” approach to evaluating possible acquisitions starts with culture, then works its way outwards towards financial metrics.
“We will want to understand how they have managed their business throughout its course, so we can understand its culture and people,” he said.
Private equity is having its moment in wealth management and accounting, following a significant drop off in deal activity by volume and value in 2023 when compared to the prior year. Experts remain wary, however, that capital options from nonbank entities could yield unforeseen risks.
In Top 100 Firm Cherry Bekaert’s most recent annual report on leveraged buyout deals, experts highlight how the higher interest rate environment present over the last few years drove up capital costs and pushed many towards alternative funding sources. This growth in the private-credit market has positioned PE firms as “the primary drivers of private credit consumption” but haven’t alleviated concerns of a growing PE bubble, the report said.
“As investments have begun to take shape and private equity demonstrates its ability to drive transformational growth and improve financial performance in people-heavy businesses, the hesitation has become less concerning,” the report said. “CPA, consulting and wealth management firms appear to be in the midst of a private equity-backed revolution.”
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.