Connect with us

Accounting

Chicago mayor brings back corporate tax once dubbed ‘job killer’

Published

on

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson wants to close nearly half of next year’s $1.19 billion deficit with new or higher taxes on large corporations, big tech companies and the rich.

The first-term Democrat on Thursday is proposing roughly $586.6 million in additional revenue from various types of companies and business activities. His plan would bring back a so-called head tax, which would levy $21 per employee per month on companies with at least 100 employees to raise $100 million to support community safety programs.

Companies that could end up paying more depending on how the proposals are ultimately structured include: Amazon Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., United Airlines Holdings Inc., Walmart Inc. and others that have a significant presence in the city. Johnson also wants to launch a social media amusement tax, raise the levy on cloud computing, expand a congestion tax zone, and tax hemp and online sports betting. 

“Instead of asking our residents to sacrifice even more, we are asking large corporations and Big Tech companies that have made trillions of dollars to pitch in a little bit more,” Johnson said in his prepared remarks. “Instead of asking Woodlawn and Englewood and Uptown to pay more, we are asking Google and Amazon and Microsoft to put more skin in the game.”

The proposed new or higher taxes come as Johnson has limited options to find more cash as he tries to make up for cuts that President Donald Trump’s administration has threatened to make to transit and education. At the same time, he has been in a standoff with Trump over immigration raids in the third-largest U.S. city. Johnson indicated his budget proposals are justified given tax cuts corporations are getting under Trump’s signature tax and spending legislation.

Past opposition

The business community has already opposed several of the proposals in the past. Johnson wants to raise the tax on cloud computing for the second year in a row. That, along with other levies, would help boost revenue by $333 million. The social media amusement tax seeks to raise $31 million to support crisis response and mental health services. 

The money generated from the head tax would be put into a separate fund, and the costs of the community safety programs it would support could shift out of the city’s main operating fund, which faces back-to-back years of deficits as revenue lags costs. Johnson said the head tax would only apply to the top 3% of businesses in the city. 

A previous $4 corporate head tax expired roughly a decade ago under former Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who had dubbed it the “job killer.” Johnson’s administration said its proposed per-head levy of $21 reflects inflation.

“It’s not a job killer. It’s a job creator,” said Johnson, who added that he is addressing public safety, a top concern of the city’s business community. 

Johnson has been pushing since his campaign days for corporations and wealthy residents to pay more to reduce the burden on the city’s working class residents and the neediest. His past efforts to raise taxes on the rich failed. The city’s voters rejected raising the levy on the sale of higher priced homes to help reduce homelessness and before that, a ballot measure to shift the state from a flat to a graduated income tax failed.

The city council also unanimously rejected Johnson’s plan last year to raise property taxes by $300 million. Johnson this time did not include a property tax increase to balance the 2026 budget. The budget needs the approval of the city council.

The mayor noted that the city’s economic development funds — called tax increment financing districts — are expected to provide a record $1 billion surplus in the fiscal year beginning in Jan. 1, with about half the money going to Chicago Public Schools and the remainder funneled to other taxing bodies including the city, park district and city colleges.

To reduce costs by roughly $200 million, Johnson is also proposing to limit police overtime, a one-year hiring freeze and tech upgrades to improve efficiency. The city also plans to make a supplemental payment toward its underfunded pensions, but the amount would be smaller in 2026 than in previous years partly because casino revenue will be less than previously forecast.

The mayor is also proposing issuing bonds to fund infrastructure, housing and economic development and refunding to lower debt costs. He wants to sell debt to spread out one-time costs for settlements and judgments over five years, and help cover retroactive payments for a union contract over three years.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending