Connect with us

Accounting

Committee advances tax and IRS legislation

Published

on

The tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved five bipartisan tax-related bills last week aimed at helping natural disaster victims, sexual assault survivors, pre-school teachers, taxpayers in general and tax fraud whistleblowers.

Processing Content

The Survivor Justice Tax Prevention Act (H.R. 2347), co-sponsored by Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pennsylvania, and Gwen Moore, D-Wisconsin, would exclude from gross income all compensatory damages awarded to sexual assault victims, regardless of proof of physical injury. The exclusion would apply to all compensatory damages and settlements attributable to a sexual act or sexual contact. The bill aims to make it easier for victims to prove to the IRS that a sexual assault occurred by allowing a victim to present a court decision or settlement agreement as presumptive evidence. Victims would not be forced to relitigate their case with the IRS if the claim is audited. The IRS would be prohibited from requiring a sexual assault victim to provide medical records in order to substantiate the claim. The bill passed unanimously with a 41-0 vote.

The Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act (H.R. 5366), named after a now deceased lawmaker who introduced it and co-sponsored by Rep. Greg Steube, R-Florida, Mike Thompson, D-California, and Jimmy Panetta, D-California, would extend a more generous treatment of personal casualty losses to disasters that occurred prior to Jan. 1, 2027. Under current law, taxpayers can deduct personal casualty losses, subject only to minor limitations, for disasters that occurred between Dec. 28, 2019, and July 4, 2025. However, this rule expires for disasters after July 4, 2025, so fewer disaster victims are currently eligible for a deduction when they suffer disaster-related losses. The bill would exclude wildfire relief payments from taxable income regardless of when they are received, so long as the wildfire disaster declaration occurs after Dec. 31, 2014, and before Jan. 1, 2027. As a result, more taxpayers who have been harmed by disasters and wildfires would be eligible for these tax benefits. This bill also passed unanimously with a 43-0 vote. 

The Supporting Early-childhood Educators’ Deductions Act (SEED Act) (H.R. 5334), co-sponsored by Rep. Jimmy Panetta, D-California, and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pennsylvania, would expand the definition of “eligible educators” to include early childhood educators, including early childhood teachers, instructors, counselors, principals and aides. As a result, individuals who teach or care for children ages zero to five would be able to deduct out-of-pocket professional expenses, including expenditures for participation in professional development courses, and supplementary education materials used in the classroom, such as books, supplies and equipment. The deduction would be available for up to $350 of expenses per year for taxpayers who take the standard deduction. In addition, taxpayers that itemize deductions could also deduct expenses above $350. Under current law, eligible educators who teach kindergarten through grade 12 are permitted to deduct certain professional expenses, including expenditures for participation in professional development courses, and supplementary education materials used in the classroom, such as books, supplies and equipment. However, early childhood educators who teach or care for children who are not yet in kindergarten are not eligible for this deduction. This bill also passed unanimously with a vote of 43-0.

The Taxpayer Experience Improvement Act (H.R. 7971), co-sponsored by Rep. David Schweikert, R-Arizona, and Don Beyer, D-Virginia, would require the IRS to establish a user-friendly real-time dashboard on IRS.gov to provide taxpayers with information on call volume, backlogs, wait times, and the availability of callbacks. It would require upgrades to the IRS’s “Where’s my Refund?” tool, “Where’s my Amended Return?” tool, and individual online accounts. The IRS would need to provide more individualized information to taxpayers about the status of their refunds, reducing taxpayer questions and confusion. The bill would expand online accounts so taxpayers would be able to view their balance due, tax transcript and certain returns, and allow them to make payments and see whether certain notices were issued. The bill would also clarify that by 2028 the IRS should provide taxpayers with the option to receive a callback when calls are not answered within five minutes. The bill passed by a unanimous 43-0 vote.

The IRS Whistleblower Program Improvement Act (H.R. 7959), co-sponsored by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pennsylvania, and Mike Thompson, D-California, would provide a more favorable standard of review in whistleblower appeals before the U.S. Tax Court, allowing new evidence to be admitted to the record. The bill would protect whistleblowers from being compelled to identify themselves publicly when pursuing appeals before the court, allowing them to proceed anonymously when challenging an IRS action. It would encourage timely award payments to whistleblowers by imposing interest if the IRS fails to issue a preliminary award recommendation within 12 months. The bill would also align the tax treatment of attorney’s fees for IRS whistleblowers with the standard applied under other federal whistleblower programs. The bill passed the committee by a unanimous 41-0 vote. 

“The Ways and Means Committee continues to champion bipartisan solutions to address key challenges facing the American people,” said committee chairman Jason Smith, R-Missouri, in a statement last Wednesday. “Whether it is ending the unfair tax treatment of sexual assault survivors, supporting early-childhood educators, or helping victims of natural disasters have more resources to rebuild, the committee has taken important steps to support Americans most in need of assistance. At the same time, reforms to the IRS Whistleblower Program will help maintain the integrity of our tax code and combat fraud, a key priority of this committee. Customer service upgrades and more online access to information will go a long way toward modernizing the IRS and providing the type of experience American taxpayers deserve. I commend my colleagues for working across the aisle to find common cause on these critical reforms.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending