Connect with us

Accounting

Congress considers how to fix the Corporate Transparency Act

Published

on

The Corporate Transparency Act passed both Houses of Congress with bipartisan support in 2021 and went into effect on Jan. 1, 2024. Since then, it has been declared unconstitutional by one court and is the subject of lawsuits in at least three other courts. 

While it did not garner much awareness at the beginning, the American Institute of CPAs, the National Association of Enrolled Agents, and a number of preparer organizations have been speaking out against its filing requirements and the effect they have on small businesses and those who assist them. 

And at a congressional hearing held Tuesday to kick off Small Business Week, Roger Harris, president of Padgett Business Services, predicted massive noncompliance with the act’s beneficial ownership information filing requirements if the rules remain as they currently are.

capitol-mall.jpg

The CTA requires “reporting companies” — defined as corporations, limited liability companies, or other similar entities registered to do business in the U.S. — to file a beneficial ownership information report with the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Beginning Jan. 1, 2024, reporting companies created or registered to do business in the United States before Jan. 1, 2024, must file by Jan. 1, 2025. Reporting companies created or registered to do business in the United States in 2024 have 90 calendar days to file after receiving actual or public notice that their company’s creation or registration is effective. 

The 23 exemptions from the filing requirement include tax-exempt entities, credit unions, and public utilities, with the major exemption for large operating companies. A large operating company is one which employs more than 20 full-time employees in the U.S.; filed a federal income tax return showing more than $5 million in in gross receipts or sales, including receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and through which the entity operates; and has an operating presence at a physical location in the U.S. 

FinCEN estimates there will be approximately 32 million reporting companies in the first year of the reporting requirement and approximately 5 million new reporting companies each year thereafter. 

While individually they are small, collectively they represent a major portion of the American economy, according to Harris, who estimated that the 61.6 million small business employees in the U.S. comprise nearly 46% of employees nationwide. 

“These are the businesses and entities that will primarily be impacted by the BOI reporting requirement,” he said — and the majority of these small businesses do not have the internal capacity to track and follow the many regulations and compliance requirements that fall on their businesses. 

“Small-business owners who get into the business to do the one thing they love are also required to do 99 other things they hate,” he remarked in testimony before the House Committee on Small Business on Tuesday. And while most legislation has small-business exceptions, the CTA specifically targets small businesses.

Harris pointed out that the act’s requirements do not reflect the reality of businesses’ relationship with their tax professionals and other third-party service providers. They will likely have annual or slightly more often communication with them, but will not interact with them on a weekly or monthly basis. 

“If a beneficial owner’s driver’s license is renewed, has a name change, or a change in residential address, the requirement to notify FinCEN within 30 days will not be top of mind and would lead to rampant noncompliance,” Harris warned. “Furthermore, third-party service providers are not privy to those changes or made aware of them on a regular basis.”

“While FinCEN argued in its final rule that the reporting company is ultimately responsible for the filing and third parties will be certifying on their behalf, the reality is that the third party may also be subject to the penalties and additional protection is needed to encourage third parties to help,” he said.

Harris suggested that FinCEN work more closely with the Internal Revenue Service to better understand how to educate the tax professional industry, as well as to provide joint guidance and examples, as is common with more complicated tax rules that help empower tax pros to be part of the solution. 

Among the examples of where more clarity is needed, Harris cited substantial control of family members, business closers, and changes in number of employees that cause a business to move in and out of the BOI requirements. 

“I was encouraged by members on both sides of the aisle,” Harris said after the hearing. “They recognized that something has to change, and hopefully it will lead to a better bill to make it work for everybody. As I left, someone handed me a text of a bill introduced this morning to repeal the CTA. It’s uncertain how far it will go, but it’s an indication that the attitude toward the CTA is changing.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending