The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, in collaboration with the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, have introduced the COSO Fraud Risk Management Certificate program.
The new certification, offered through the Institute of Internal Auditors and the Institute of Management Accountants in addition to the ACFE, aims to help professionals enhance their expertise in fraud risk management. COSO is jointly sponsored by the IIA and the IMA, along with the American Accounting Association, the American Institute of CPAs and Financial Executives International.
Fraud
Alex/Getty Images/iStockphoto
The certificate program builds on the Fraud Risk Management Guide that COSO first introduced in 2016 and expanded in 2023, to provide a more comprehensive approach to identifying, assessing and mitigating fraud risks. The second edition of the guide outlines five key principles organizations should follow to establish an effective fraud risk management program.
The COSO Fraud Risk Management Certificate gives participants the necessary skills to implement a robust fraud risk management framework based on COSO principles. The program includes self-paced learning modules, and a certifying exam. Upon successful completion, participants will earn an official COSO Fraud Risk Guide Certificate and Digital Badge, demonstrating their proficiency in fraud deterrence and management.
“Managing fraud risk is a challenge for organizations of all sizes,” said COSO executive director and chair Lucia Wind in a statement Wednesday. “This program provides professionals with the knowledge and tools needed to build strong anti-fraud controls, risk assessments and programs, ultimately strengthening organizational resilience and fostering a culture of integrity.”
The certification program includes practical strategies for implementing COSO’s fraud risk management framework; best practices for fraud deterrence, detection and response; integration of fraud risk management with internal controls and data analytics; plus case studies and real-world applications.
“In continuing our partnership with COSO our organizations form a united front against fraud,” said ACFE president John Gill in a statement. “The ACFE is pleased to join forces once again to develop this new certificate that will assist professionals in navigating fraud risks, as well as continue guiding organizations in establishing a comprehensive and effective fraud risk management program.”
Separately, the ACFE recently released the In-House Fraud Investigation Teams: 2025 Benchmarking Report, discussing the groups that help prevent and detect fraud at organizations. The report examines common trends in caseloads, credentials, recovery of fraud losses and more.
Accounting firms are among the groups with fraud experts who assist clients. “I have several fraud projects going on right now,” Brian Lafountain, a partner at The Bonadio Group in Pittsford, New York, told Accounting Today. “The thing that I’m running into in most of my jobs is a lack of adequate policies and procedures being in place. The key thing is the controls that are built into the policies and procedures, which are approvals, authorizations, reconciliations. As you’re going through the procedures or whatever your daily operational responsibilities are, there’s things that need to be built in to identify or to raise a flag when something is off or something doesn’t reconcile, or a prompt that you can’t go further in the process until you get somebody’s approval.”
He has recently been working on a project for a local municipality in which an employee has allegedly misappropriated funds. “I believe she purposely keeps no documentation, so that makes it very difficult for us when we come back and try to recreate events, to try to confirm that money is missing because there’s no source documentation,” he said. “She takes tax payments from local vendors or local residents, or she issues building permits and things of that nature. … They come in and they pay that, and she doesn’t ever give them a receipt.”
The lack of receipts or a cash log can make it difficult to accumulate the evidence. “We see a lot of that, honestly, a lack of documentation, a lack of documented policies and procedures, things of that nature, and a lack of internal control that severely increases the risk of something nefarious happening,” said Lafountain. “If you don’t have controls in place to monitor these things, then it can perpetuate itself and keep going on through months and months at a time before it’s ever caught. The vast majority of the frauds that we catch, we catch via a whistleblower of some sort. It’s a tip that comes in, whether it’s an email tip or a phone call, whatever it is.”
The Bonadio Group offers a toll-free fraud and abuse hotline that it sells to its clients. “The messages come directly to my group here at Bonadio, and we have a staff of Certified Fraud Examiners who answer that phone and document the allegations,” said Lafountain. “It’s all anonymous, so the organization is not involved. We prepare a report of what the allegations are, and then we send it back to the organization so that they can follow up on it.”
He noted that in the latest ACFE occupational fraud report, the 2024 Report to the Nations, 43% of frauds are identified through tips. “It’s important to make sure that you have some kind of mechanism set up where employees or vendors can report any suspicious activity or any allegations,” said Lafountain.
As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.
Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.
The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.
WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.
The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.
Untested Legal Mechanism
To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.
Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.
“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.
USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs
Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:
Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
Potash and critical minerals
Fish and seafood
Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)
Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.
Canadian Response and Market Reaction
Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.
With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.
The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.
The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.
Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.
However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.