Accounting
Counties with highest capital gains per 2025 study
The more value that investors can receive in the form of long-term capital gains rather than ordinary income, the less they will pay back to Uncle Sam.
Those in the 20 counties below ranked by the average net capital gains reported on their federal returns to the IRS are getting above-average appreciation on their assets with much lower tax rates, generally, than their incoming income,
For financial advisors and their clients, the list provided
“Net capital gains represent the profits a taxpayer recognizes from selling a capital asset after offsetting capital losses. These gains are often created by highly appreciated assets,” Kathy Buchs, a senior tax advisor, team leader and managing director with Cleveland, Ohio-based registered investment advisory firm
“We take geography into account when advising clients to sell an asset or consider tax loss harvesting due to
That difference in tax rules at the state level raises the possibility of strategies such as an incomplete gift non-grantor trust that, in some areas, could “eliminate the state taxation of the trust-owned portfolio,” said Richard Austin, an executive director for estate and business planning with San Diego and Waltham, Massachusetts-based RIA firm
“Tax efficiency significantly impacts the performance of a client’s portfolio by maximizing the after-tax return on investments,” Austin said. “Investing across different countries and regions can reduce portfolio volatility. Markets in different parts of the world often have low correlation, meaning they don’t always move in the same direction at the same time. If one market experiences a downturn, others might perform well, potentially stabilizing overall returns and the potential for future capital gains. State-specific tax rates impact tax efficiency of a portfolio. The difference in state income taxes creates a significant layer of complexity in achieving tax efficiency for a client’s portfolio.”
Even though any type of data presents the possibility of noise factors affecting any particular region, the study “highlights that taking geography into account is essential when advising clients on their asset allocations,” said Michelle Ash, a senior wealth advisor with the Jacksonville, Florida-based office of RIA firm
“Net capital gains is measured when a person is selling assets, and so it requires past investment success to be in that position,” Ash said in an email. “It’s no surprise to me that Florida would be the top state by this metric. Florida has no state income, inheritance or estate taxes, and so it’s a beneficial place to live when you’re selling assets. These Florida traits also attract a lot of retiring individuals who may be selling assets like homes and businesses when they retire or move.”
In focusing on capital gains, SmartAsset sought to home in on the areas where investors netted the most gains with preferential rates compared to ordinary income, according to the report’s author, SmartAsset Director of Economic Analysis Jaclyn DeJohn.
“Net capital gains, the profits from selling assets like stocks, real estate or businesses, are a key measure of investment success
Besides the listing below, here are some of the other interesting takeaways from the study:
- Three Georgia counties, Chattahoochee, Quitman and Taliaferro, displayed the smallest average net capital gains, at $2,400 or less. Fewer than 10% of returns in the counties had net capital gains.
- At the state level, West Virginia tax returns had the lowest average net capital gains at $14,612, followed by Wisconsin with $19,590 and Iowa with $20,220.
- On the other end of the spectrum among the states, federal returns out of Florida ($84,911), Wyoming ($84,246), Nevada ($77,491), the District of Columbia ($58,733) and Texas ($52,926) reported the highest average net capital gains.
Scroll down the slideshow for the ranking of the top 20 counties in the U.S. in terms of average net capital gains. To see a list of the top 10 cities with the highest income among retirees,
Note: The below rankings are based on a report by SmartAsset called, “
KPMG anoints next management committee; Ryan forms Tariff Task Force; and more news from across the profession.
Accounting
Mid-year moves: Why placed-in-service dates matter more than ever for cost segregation planning
In the world of depreciation planning, one small timing detail continues to fly under the radar — and it’s costing taxpayers serious money.
Most people fixate on what a property costs or how much they can write off. But the placed-in-service date — when the IRS considers a property ready and available for use — plays a crucial role in determining bonus depreciation eligibility for cost segregation studies.
And as bonus depreciation continues to phase out (or possibly bounce back), that timing has never been more important.
Why placed-in-service timing gets overlooked
The IRS defines “placed in service” as the moment a property is ready and available for its intended use.
For rentals, that means:
- It’s available for move-in, and,
- It’s listed or actively being shown.
But in practice, this definition gets misapplied. Some real estate owners assume the closing date is enough. Others delay listing the property until after the new year, missing key depreciation opportunities.
And that gap between intent and readiness? That’s where deductions quietly slip away.
Bonus depreciation: The clock is ticking
Under current law, bonus depreciation is tapering fast:
- 2024: 60%
- 2025: 40%
- 2026: 20%
- 2027: 0%
The difference between a property placed in service on December 31 versus January 2 can translate into tens of thousands in immediate deductions.
And just to make things more interesting — on May 9, the House Ways and Means Committee released a draft bill that would reinstate 100% bonus depreciation retroactive to Jan. 20, 2025. (The
The result? Accountants now have to think in two timelines:
- What the current rules say;
- What Congress might say a few months from now.
It’s a tricky season to navigate — but also one where proactive advice carries real weight.
Typical scenarios where timing matters
Placed-in-service missteps don’t always show up on a tax return — but they quietly erode what could’ve been better results. Some common examples:
- End-of-year closings where the property isn’t listed or rent-ready until January.
- Short-term rentals delayed by renovation punch lists or permitting hang-ups.
- Commercial buildings waiting on tenant improvements before becoming operational.
Each of these cases may involve a difference of just a few days — but that’s enough to miss a year’s bonus depreciation percentage.
Planning moves for the second half of the year
As Q3 and Q4 approach, here are a few moves worth making:
- Confirm the service-readiness timeline with clients acquiring property in the second half of the year.
- Educate on what “in service” really means — closing isn’t enough.
- Create a checklist for documentation: utilities on, photos of rent-ready condition, listings or lease activity.
- Track bonus depreciation eligibility relative to current and potential legislative shifts.
For properties acquired late in the year, encourage clients to fast-track final steps. The tax impact of being placed in service by December 31 versus January 2 is larger than most realize.
If the window closes, there’s still value
Even if a property misses bonus depreciation, cost segregation still creates long-term savings — especially for high-income earners.
Partial-year depreciation still applies, and in some cases, Form 3115 can allow for catch-up depreciation in future years. The strategy may shift, but the opportunity doesn’t disappear.
Placed-in-service dates don’t usually show up on investor spreadsheets. But they’re one of the most controllable levers in maximizing tax savings. For CPAs and advisors, helping clients navigate that timing correctly can deliver outsized results.
Because at the end of the day, smart tax planning isn’t just about what you buy — it’s about when you put it to work.
South Africa’s case against executives in the biggest corporate fraud in the country’s history will be moved to a higher court for complex criminal trials, with their next hearing also pushed back to September.
Stéhan Grobler, the head of treasury at Steinhoff International Holdings NV when the furniture giant unraveled almost eight years ago, received extended bail along with two other former executives at Steinhoff subsidiaries and affiliates at a hearing in the Specialized Commercial Crimes Court in Pretoria on Friday.
Their case will be moved to the High Court, with their next hearing scheduled for Sept. 3 when a trial date is likely to be set.
The extra time will allow the prosecution to finalize investigations and secure a racketeering certificate, according to court proceedings, while prosecutors were also waiting for an affidavit from witnesses in Germany that arrived on Friday. A finalized charge sheet will be ready by June 17.
Grobler says he’s innocent of charges already set out by prosecutors including racketeering, manipulation of financial statements and three counts of fraud worth 21 billion rand ($1.2 billion).
The collapse of Steinhoff, once feted for a gutsy entrepreneurial spirit that built a retail empire spanning Australia, Europe and the U.S., rocked South Africa as the company’s share price collapsed in December 2017, hitting everyone from staff and creditors to the government workers’ pension fund. About 230 billion rand was lost on the Johannesburg stock exchange in a matter of days.
Pressure has been building on prosecutors, especially after a 7,000-page report on Steinhoff’s dealings — compiled by auditor PwC in the wake of its collapse — was finally released six months ago. Former Chief Financial Officer Ben la Grange is the most senior Steinhoff executive to be jailed so far, but his plea deal last year — including a requirement to testify in the Grobler case — meant the scandal has yet to be fully aired in court.
Former Chief Executive Officer Markus Jooste died by suicide in March 2024.
Steinhoff, which owned Conforama in France and Mattress Firm in the U.S., collapsed after auditors refused to sign off on its financial statements. That led to the start of police and regulatory investigations in both Europe and South Africa. The probe by auditor PwC uncovered €6.5 billion ($7.4 billion) of irregular transactions with eight firms over eight years.
Why the president must not be lexicographer-in-chief
On the move: HHM promotes former intern to partner
Daniel Loeb’s next task as his hedge fund turns 30: Avoiding becoming ‘AI roadkill’
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
-
Accounting1 week agoHouse tax bill includes provision eliminating PCAOB
-
Economics1 week agoWhat happens if the Inflation Reduction Act goes away?
-
Personal Finance1 week agoWhat House Republican ‘big beautiful’ budget bill means for your money
-
Accounting1 week agoTrump tax bill faces Senate’s arcane rules, desire for changes
-
Finance1 week agoPersonal finance app Monarch raises $75 million
-
Economics1 week agoHow much worse could America’s measles outbreak get?
-
Economics1 week agoA court resurrects the United States Institute of Peace
-
Economics1 week agoCalifornia has got really good at building giant batteries