Connect with us

Accounting

CPAs are collateral damage in DOL freelance rule, Trump administration must intervene

Published

on

Following the pandemic, a dramatic shift in the American workforce has led to an explosion in freelance labor. 

More than half of people born after 1996 are self-employed, forgoing the corporate ladder in pursuit of flexibility, autonomy and a “new American dream.” Even more complex tax requirements, such as the addition of quarterly IRS payments on estimated income, haven’t dulled the movement’s momentum, with freelancers opting to enlist qualified CPAs and accountants to help shoulder the burden instead of returning to full-time employment. However, in a chilling turn for these resilient freelancers and their trusted financial advisors, new regulations by the Department of Labor now threaten to irreparably damage the gig economy.

In late October, an Atlanta court ruled in favor of a Biden administration DOL guideline reclassifying many freelancers as full-time employees. The rule, which attempts to solve the problem of sub-par benefits that have long plagued those who are self-employed, does so by forcing companies to hire their most prolific freelancers so that they may receive employer-sponsored benefits. However, by hamstringing freelancers and employers into a work style they neither fully want, the DOL’s legislative folly risks destroying the freedom to freelance altogether. Thus, it is imperative that CPAs, accountants and other tax professionals band together with freelancers to implore the incoming administration to decisively repeal these guidelines.

The vital impact of freelance work

For millions of Americans, freelancing is a ticket to economic and geographical independence, and a way to level the playing field and uplift diverse perspectives in the workforce. None of these advantages can be easily replicated in a full-time work environment. From freelance writers broadening the perspective of publications to creatives transforming an organization’s brand, these workers infuse new energy into companies every day, in addition to contributing $1.27tn in annual earnings to the US economy. 

Freelancers also contribute more in taxes than the average worker, with the addition of a 15.3% self-employment tax to fund Social Security and Medicare to the normal slate of federal, state and local tax rates paid by all full-time employees. To offset these costs and help navigate the complexities of what constitutes a deductible business expense, freelancers will often turn to a professional CPA. This is a particularly critical step considering that freelancers are audited at three times the rate of full-time employees. Thus, even as full-time employees with W2-only returns have spurned their tax preparers for online options like TurboTax, the gig economy has become an unexpected lifeline for the dwindling accounting profession.

Better solutions for freelance benefits

Despite the DOL’s misguided approach, the agency is aligned with freelancers in believing that the lack of benefits is one of the most pressing issues for freelancers today, one of the reasons why health insurance premiums are a deductible business expense on Schedule C. Without access to employer-sponsored plans, freelancers are left to fend for themselves to create a health insurance benefits package or piece together their retirement fund. They miss out entirely on many of the most prominent benefits enjoyed by full-time workers, including sick, parental and maternity leave, paid vacation, a 401(k) match and even a steady month-to-month income. 

However, the accounting profession should join freelancers in imploring the next administration to let these issues be solved by the private sector, rather than through heavy-handed government action. Startups like Catch are already developing solutions to some of the biggest pain points of freelance work, including expensive health, dental and vision insurance. By acting as an administrative companion for independent contractors, Catch offers insurance rates comparable to those offered in a corporate benefits package, but for freelancers. However, in stark contrast to the DOL’s proposal, freelancers also retain their independence. If a startup can strike a balance between providing affordable benefits to freelancers while allowing them to operate independently, surely it is not too tall an order to demand that the DOL do the same.

An action plan for freelance advocacy

Almost 40% of the entire US workforce, or 64 million Americans, performed freelance work in just the past year alone. This is a figure worth celebrating not only for gig economy workers, but for every industry that benefits from a thriving freelance community, accountants and tax professionals included. However, if the DOL rule as written is allowed to remain on the books, the number of freelancers could decline precipitously in the coming years. Given the emerging, symbiotic relationship between the gig economy and their tax preparers, the accounting profession must intervene.

Taking action starts with lobbying the incoming administration for an immediate repeal of the DOL’s current rule on Inauguration Day. However, regardless of success or failure, the accounting profession should recognize its advocacy efforts are only beginning. Given the rising prevalence of the gig economy to accountants’ bottom lines, the profession should build on its momentum and push for pro-freelance legislation throughout the years to come, especially in support of self-employment tax reform efforts

As written, the Biden administration DOL rule muddles the definition of freelance labor so that most independent contractors could conceivably be reclassified as employees. Such an expansive proposition isn’t worth the risk, and the accounting profession should join freelancers in calling for an immediate repeal in favor of a more pragmatic approach to freelance labor. To sit idly by risks negating the positive impact of a thriving gig economy on the U.S. economy and its citizens.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending