Connect with us

Accounting

Cruz pitches $1.1T cut to Fed bank payments for Trump tax bill

Published

on

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz pitched Republican senators Wednesday on ending the Federal Reserve’s authority to pay interest to banks, claiming it would save $1.1 trillion over a decade, with members of the party’s conservative flank lauding the idea.

“I made the case directly to the president in the Oval Office last week, I made the case at lunch today,” Cruz said in an interview at the Capitol. If the idea is added to Trump’s massive tax and spending package, it could help to offset the cost and limit its impact on the deficit, Cruz said.

Cruz noted payments of interest on reserves only started in 2008 during the financial crisis but have exploded from $1 billion that year to $186 billion in 2024 as interest rates climbed.

“The case I made at lunch is we’re agonizing trying to find a $50 billion cut here and there. This is over a trillion dollars, big dollars in savings,” he said. “Half of it is going to foreign banks, which makes no sense.”

Bond purchases

The Fed first paid interest on reserve balances, or IORB, after it began its first round of large-scale bond purchases. Those purchases were aimed at stimulating the economy, but also created outsized bank reserves.

Paying interest on the swelling reserves often ensured that banks wouldn’t lend them out at a lower rate than the Fed wanted, thereby holding a floor under the overnight interbank market.

Cruz rejected the argument that the Fed needs to pay interest to help control short-term interest rates, given the payments didn’t occur before 2008.

“From 1913 to 2008, they managed to do it just fine,” he said.

Blake Gwinn, head of U.S. interest rate strategy at RBC Capital Markets, said adopting the proposal could create severe difficulties for the Fed.

“If you do it, you’re going to have to give it a lot of runway,” Gwinn said. “To end it immediately would be disastrous. To unwind this you have to have some lag time. If you don’t give it lag time, it’s going to be a huge mess.”

Barclays strategists on Monday predicted the Fed’s interest expenses would remain elevated even if lawmakers eliminated interest on reserves. In that case, they wrote, more cash would likely shift to a separate Fed program, the Overnight Reverse Repurchase Facility, that is also used to stabilize money market rates.

Cruz predicted some of the bank reserves would instead be put in short-term government debt instead, which he said would help lower interest rates and drive down the government’s interest expenses.

Two conservative holdouts on the tax bill — Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — also are backing the idea, as is prominent Texas Representative Chip Roy.

Scott said he’s pitched the idea to many people to help shrink the deficit. “We have to balance the budget,” he said.

‘Really stupid’

Johnson called the Fed interest payments, especially to foreign banks, “really stupid.”

He mocked resistance from banks. “Everybody loves free federal money,” he said sarcastically. “That just locks up capital.”

Congress first authorized the U.S. central bank to pay interest on reserves in 2006 through the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act. It was initially slated to take effect in 2011 but was pulled forward as the result of the 2008 financial crisis.

Policymakers have since added the overnight reverse repo facility — which pays interest on cash that counterparties, predominantly non-banks like money-market funds, park at the central bank — to solidify the Fed’s control over short-term rates.

But eradicating IORB could change how banks manage liquidity, potentially shifting cash back to money markets and crowding out existing participants in Treasury bills, repurchase agreements and fed funds, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Money the Fed pays to banks as interest on reserves doesn’t come from congressionally appropriated funds. But the payouts do reduce the amount of money the Fed remits annually to the Treasury, funds the Treasury would otherwise be forced to borrow.

Interest paid on reserves totaled $186.5 billion in 2024, contributing to the central bank’s $77.6 billion operating loss. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending